ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> The newest version of this patch still doesn't work correctly. Switching the
> new `LoadExternalSpecializationsLazily` to disabled by default (somehow the
> argument didn't work on its own) instead crashes, most of the cases involving
> `MultiOnDiskHashTable`. I suspect som
https://github.com/pileghoff updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79588
>From 38d96aba5818091d48c40a46738f5adbf881b2a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pil Eghoff
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:30:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Fix c23 not checking CheckBoolLikeConversion
---
clang/do
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
>From 8f7d83aed173688ff1413b7c4445d4576efee872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:55:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Implement Class Template Argument Deduction (CTAD)
for type
https://github.com/kadircet edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79746
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kadircet requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79746
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -138,15 +138,9 @@ std::string getNamespaceScope(const Decl *D) {
std::string printDefinition(const Decl *D, PrintingPolicy PP,
const syntax::TokenBuffer &TB) {
- if (auto *VD = llvm::dyn_cast(D)) {
-if (auto *IE = VD->getInit()) {
- //
@@ -1720,6 +1720,12 @@ void StmtPrinter::VisitInitListExpr(InitListExpr* Node) {
OS << "{";
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Node->getNumInits(); i != e; ++i) {
if (i) OS << ", ";
+// TODO: There is duplicated functionality in APValue::printPretty.
+// Would be good to
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
davemgreen wrote:
OK. We would not usually add intrinsics like this without a strong motivating
case, that could not be optimized in some other way. It is better to use target
independent options when available, and inline assembly is available as a
fallback if it is really needed. But I would
HighCommander4 wrote:
Linking to the issue this is seeking to address for reference:
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1589
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78454
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79796
Change AfterPlacementOperator to a boolean. Also add SBPO_None for never
inserting a space before a left parenthesis and deprecate SBPO_Never, which
meant never inserting a space except when after new/delete.
Fi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Change AfterPlacementOperator to a boolean. Also add SBPO_None for never
inserting a space before a left parenthesis and deprecate SBPO_Never, which
meant never inserting a space except when after new/dele
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74056
>From 9be777d5b39852cf3c0b2538fd5f712922672caa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 18:00:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Reapply "InstCombine: Introduce
SimplifyDemandedUseFPClass""
@@ -2561,6 +2567,70 @@ bool SIMemoryLegalizer::expandAtomicCmpxchgOrRmw(const
SIMemOpInfo &MOI,
return Changed;
}
+bool SIMemoryLegalizer::GFX9InsertWaitcntForPreciseMem(MachineFunction &MF) {
arsenm wrote:
can you just make this happen as a consequence of
@@ -2561,6 +2567,70 @@ bool SIMemoryLegalizer::expandAtomicCmpxchgOrRmw(const
SIMemOpInfo &MOI,
return Changed;
}
+bool SIMemoryLegalizer::GFX9InsertWaitcntForPreciseMem(MachineFunction &MF) {
+ const GCNSubtarget &ST = MF.getSubtarget();
+ const SIInstrInfo *TII = ST.get
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
>From becb1bdebc8d10296a5c9f1af64ebae5ca9b68b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:55:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Implement Class Template Argument Deduction (CTAD)
for type
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
Missing changelog, otherwise LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/HighCommander4 commented:
Thanks, the approach in this patch looks pretty good to me.
My only feedback is to encapsulate the "hard coding" into a function like:
```
Option TryConvertToRename(const Diag *D, const Fix *F)
```
because I can imagine in the future coming across o
https://github.com/hokein ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
Fixes #54051
This patch implements the C++20 feature -- CTAD for alias templates.
It is an initial patch, which covers most of pieces, the major missing piece is
to implement the associated constraints (over.ma
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78284
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-01-29T10:04:17+01:00
New Revision: 9f80ecb308c989523cc32d4256f7ab61c5b788d7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f80ecb308c989523cc32d4256f7ab61c5b788d7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f80ecb308c989523cc32d4256f7ab61c5b788d7.diff
L
HighCommander4 wrote:
@sam-mccall review ping :)
I would particularly appreciate feedback on whether I should plan to set aside
some time to implement the "deep lookup optimization" (from [this
comment](https://reviews.llvm.org/D93829#4258101)), or whether the 2.5%
increase in index memory us
vgvassilev wrote:
> > The newest version of this patch still doesn't work correctly. Switching
> > the new `LoadExternalSpecializationsLazily` to disabled by default (somehow
> > the argument didn't work on its own) instead crashes, most of the cases
> > involving `MultiOnDiskHashTable`. I sus
hahnjo wrote:
As far as I can tell from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774#issuecomment-1914177330 above,
the last push only changed the default value of
`LoadExternalSpecializationsLazily`. In that case, my test results from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774#issuec
vgvassilev wrote:
Ok, so it sounds it fails earlier than I expected. We might be missing
something in the implementation of the on-disk hashtable. Have you had a chance
to run valgrind?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774
___
cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> As far as I can tell from [#76774
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774#issuecomment-1914177330)
> above, the last push only changed the default value of
> `LoadExternalSpecializationsLazily`. In that case, my test results from
> [#76774
> (comment)
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76090
>From 7c31c8bc2acf60bd50cb6d63944ee8d4946b9638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:33:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [VPlan] Replace VPRecieOrVPValue with VP2VP recipe
simplification
bzEq wrote:
Though I do see some codegen improvement, I don't think we should check uses
inside `getValueBits`, since `getValueBits` is for analysis and is gathering as
much information as it can. Can you post your motivation code?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66040
__
Sh0g0-1758 wrote:
gentle ping @reviewers
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bzEq wrote:
Please provide more description in PR summary.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
If you're referring to the CI that runs here, we've been having capacity issues
lately. Another way to "resubmit" is to rebase the PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
cor3ntin wrote:
@hokein @sam-mccall to repeat what was said in the language group last week.
We do not think a feature flag is a good fit.
- Until clang 19 ships (in 6 months) we do not need to stabilize the feature
(but ofc we should avoid regressions, which we would not find if hidden behi
@@ -9027,7 +8994,8 @@ void LoopVectorizationPlanner::adjustRecipesForReductions(
// the phi until LoopExitValue. We keep track of the previous item
// (PreviousLink) to tell which of the two operands of a Link will remain
// scalar and which will be reduced. For min
@@ -9058,6 +9026,20 @@ void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::adjustRecipesForReductions(
LinkVPBB->insert(FMulRecipe, CurrentLink->getIterator());
VecOp = FMulRecipe;
} else {
+auto *Blend = dyn_cast(CurrentLink);
+if (PhiR->isInLoop() && Blend)
@@ -827,6 +827,16 @@ static unsigned getOpcodeForRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R) {
/// Try to simplify recipe \p R.
static void simplifyRecipe(VPRecipeBase &R, VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo) {
+ // Try to remove redundant blend recipes.
+ if (auto *Blend = dyn_cast(&R)) {
---
@@ -14428,15 +14431,52 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::combineSetCC(SDNode *N,
// x != 0-y --> x+y != 0
if (RHS.getOpcode() == ISD::SUB && isNullConstant(RHS.getOperand(0)) &&
RHS.hasOneUse()) {
- SDLoc DL(N);
- SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;
- EVT VT
@@ -14428,15 +14431,52 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::combineSetCC(SDNode *N,
// x != 0-y --> x+y != 0
if (RHS.getOpcode() == ISD::SUB && isNullConstant(RHS.getOperand(0)) &&
RHS.hasOneUse()) {
- SDLoc DL(N);
- SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;
- EVT VT
@@ -14428,15 +14431,52 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::combineSetCC(SDNode *N,
// x != 0-y --> x+y != 0
if (RHS.getOpcode() == ISD::SUB && isNullConstant(RHS.getOperand(0)) &&
RHS.hasOneUse()) {
- SDLoc DL(N);
- SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;
- EVT VT
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76090
>From 7c31c8bc2acf60bd50cb6d63944ee8d4946b9638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:33:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [VPlan] Replace VPRecieOrVPValue with VP2VP recipe
simplification
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
```
/var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/linux-56-59b8f5d88-r6v66-1/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/llvm/unittests/TargetParser/TargetParserTest.cpp:1662:
Failure
Expected equality of these values:
List.size()
Which is: 68
NumAArc
ecnelises wrote:
The motivating case:
```llvm
define i64 @splatByte(i64 %a) {
entry:
%x0 = shl i64 %a, 8
%x1 = and i64 %a, 255
%x2 = or i64 %x0, %x1
%x3 = shl i64 %x2, 16
%x4 = and i64 %x2, 65535
%x5 = or i64 %x3, %x4
%x6 = shl i64 %x5, 32
%x7 = and i64 %x5, 4294967295
%x8 = or
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fhahn closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76090
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78304
>From 9846f970b6b394ccc3af25b92f238377a8ae7807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:06:36 +
Subject: [PATCH] [LV] Improve AnyOf reduction codegen.
Update AnyOf reduction code ge
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Thanks for looking into this. I haven't looked it in details. Given this is
complex, it should take a relative longer time.
Here is some quick feedbacks:
- Every time we change the non-static data members of AST nodes, we need to
update the serializatio
Fznamznon wrote:
NIT: `eligable ` -> `eligible` in the description.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/BeMg updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78120
>From 8f7b429d2f7fe791a2a469e3d232d33abba1bef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Piyou Chen
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:41:59 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [RISCV] Relax march string order constraint
---
clang/test/Driver/
https://github.com/MDevereau updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79276
>From e98987ebb48839ea652d63dfaa62ed841b426e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Devereau
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:41:25 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64][SME] Implement inline-asm clobbers for za/zt0
Th
zmodem wrote:
We're hitting a "dyn_cast on a non-existent value" assert in Chromium after
this change. I've attached a reproducer here:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1522775#c2
Based on the stack, this doesn't look the same as the analyzer issue (#79575)
but there are
zmodem wrote:
I think a similar fix may be needed in `clang::IgnoreParensSingleStep`, see my
comment here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78041#issuecomment-1914407300
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79764
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -1720,6 +1720,12 @@ void StmtPrinter::VisitInitListExpr(InitListExpr* Node) {
OS << "{";
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Node->getNumInits(); i != e; ++i) {
if (i) OS << ", ";
+// TODO: There is duplicated functionality in APValue::printPretty.
+// Would be good to
mhaehnel wrote:
Your revert just masks the underlying issue. What you do now is that you *can*
specify `-system-headers-coverage` but the compiler will not actually provide
coverage data for system headers because the flag is ignored. So specifying
the switch becomes meaningless.
https://gi
https://github.com/rmarker created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79805
The dump_format_style.py script generates the clang-format style options
documentation.
There was an issue where the script could include spurious characters in the
output when run in windows. It appears that it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (rmarker)
Changes
The dump_format_style.py script generates the clang-format style options
documentation.
There was an issue where the script could include spurious characters in the
output when run in windows. It appears that it was
https://github.com/rmarker updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78011
>From a1312a0a463bb946f336977b5b01ef7afbede678 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rmarker
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:01:18 +1030
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang-format] Add ShortReturnTypeColumn option.
---
clang/docs/C
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ class State:
opts = sorted(opts, key=lambda x: x.name)
options_text = "\n\n".join(map(str, opts))
-with open(DOC_FILE) as f:
+with open(DOC_FILE, encoding="utf-8") as f:
rmarker wrote:
Moved change to its own PR. #79805
https://github.com
rmarker wrote:
@HazardyKnusperkeks, @owenca, extracted this change from #78011.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5934,6 +5938,40 @@ IntrinsicLibrary::genSum(mlir::Type resultType,
resultType, args);
}
+// SYSTEM
+void IntrinsicLibrary::genSystem(llvm::ArrayRef args) {
+ assert(args.size() == 2);
+ mlir::Value command = fir::getBase(args[0]);
+ const fir::Exte
@@ -5934,6 +5938,40 @@ IntrinsicLibrary::genSum(mlir::Type resultType,
resultType, args);
}
+// SYSTEM
+void IntrinsicLibrary::genSystem(llvm::ArrayRef args) {
+ assert(args.size() == 2);
+ mlir::Value command = fir::getBase(args[0]);
+ const fir::Exte
@@ -5934,6 +5938,40 @@ IntrinsicLibrary::genSum(mlir::Type resultType,
resultType, args);
}
+// SYSTEM
+void IntrinsicLibrary::genSystem(llvm::ArrayRef args) {
+ assert(args.size() == 2);
+ mlir::Value command = fir::getBase(args[0]);
+ const fir::Exte
@@ -1393,6 +1393,11 @@ static const IntrinsicInterface intrinsicSubroutine[]{
{"get", DefaultInt, Rank::vector, Optionality::optional,
common::Intent::Out}},
{}, Rank::elemental, IntrinsicClass::impureSubroutine},
+{"system",
+{{"
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79764
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -40,8 +40,12 @@ static const Expr *ignoreTransparentExprs(const Expr *E) {
switch (E->getStmtClass()) {
case Stmt::OpaqueValueExprClass:
-E = cast(E)->getSourceExpr();
-break;
+if (const clang::Expr *SE = cast(E)->getSourceExpr()) {
+ E = SE;
+ bre
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Approved with nits. This works around the crash.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79764
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/peterwaller-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79454
>From 18fbfe3d757372fc904146a9156e8af466c9f013 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Waller
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:29:45 +
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64][compiler-rt] Avoid use of libc header in
sme-li
@@ -5934,6 +5938,40 @@ IntrinsicLibrary::genSum(mlir::Type resultType,
resultType, args);
}
+// SYSTEM
+void IntrinsicLibrary::genSystem(llvm::ArrayRef args) {
+ assert(args.size() == 2);
+ mlir::Value command = fir::getBase(args[0]);
+ const fir::Exte
RamaMalladiAWS wrote:
Thank you @DavidSpickett
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yi-wu-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74309
>From 14f8c3e38791cc6b06455b8beffe37a6f7105e03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yi Wu
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:32:03 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Add SYSTEM runtime and lowering intrinsic support
Calls std::syst
RamaMalladiAWS wrote:
> OK. We would not usually add intrinsics like this without a strong motivating
> case, that could not be optimized in some other way. It is better to use
> target independent options when available, and inline assembly is available
> as a fallback if it is really needed.
yi-wu-arm wrote:
build and pass all test on Windows on Arm MSVC native.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78286
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5934,6 +5938,40 @@ IntrinsicLibrary::genSum(mlir::Type resultType,
resultType, args);
}
+// SYSTEM
+void IntrinsicLibrary::genSystem(llvm::ArrayRef args) {
+ assert(args.size() == 2);
+ mlir::Value command = fir::getBase(args[0]);
+ const fir::Exte
vgvassilev wrote:
> > As far as I can tell from [#76774
> > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774#issuecomment-1914177330)
> > above, the last push only changed the default value of
> > `LoadExternalSpecializationsLazily`. In that case, my test results from
> > [#76774
>
https://github.com/peterwaller-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79454
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chenshanzhi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78716
>From dcdf4a5825a402ab1392f61354c604a9cf965bdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shanzhi Chen
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:40:09 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][AST] Fix a crash on attaching doc comments
This crash
TamarChristinaArm wrote:
@vitalybuka I'm trying to backport the fixes to the GCC branches. Do I just
need to backport these 4 commits?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
RKSimon wrote:
@RamaMalladiAWS Do you have examples of the IR that fails to lower to BFI?
These things often turn out to be either a missing middle-end canonicalization
or maybe a case that could be added to existing pattern matching in the
back-end.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
https://github.com/yi-wu-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78286
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79808
The test added in #73511 currently fails in
CLANG_DEFAULT_PIE_ON_LINUX=OFF configuration, because it uses the clang driver
in a codegen test.
Split the test into two, a driver test that checks that the appropriate
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > As far as I can tell from [#76774
> > > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774#issuecomment-1914177330)
> > > above, the last push only changed the default value of
> > > `LoadExternalSpecializationsLazily`. In that case, my test results from
> > >
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nikita Popov (nikic)
Changes
The test added in #73511 currently fails in
CLANG_DEFAULT_PIE_ON_LINUX=OFF configuration, because it uses the clang driver
in a codegen test.
Split the test into two, a driver test that checks that the appropr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Nikita Popov (nikic)
Changes
The test added in #73511 currently fails in
CLANG_DEFAULT_PIE_ON_LINUX=OFF configuration, because it uses the clang driver
in a codegen test.
Split the test into two, a driver test that checks that the
Author: Shanzhi
Date: 2024-01-29T19:17:13+08:00
New Revision: 5f4ee5a2dfa97fe32ee62d1d67aa1413d5a059e6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f4ee5a2dfa97fe32ee62d1d67aa1413d5a059e6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f4ee5a2dfa97fe32ee62d1d67aa1413d5a059e6.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/vfdff closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78716
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68426
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hokein wrote:
Thanks for the summary.
> We do not think a feature flag is a good fit.
>
> * Until clang 19 ships (in 6 months) we do not need to stabilize the feature
> (but ofc we should avoid regressions, which we would not find if hidden
> behind a flag), and the flag does not guarantee ex
https://github.com/rmarker updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78011
>From a1312a0a463bb946f336977b5b01ef7afbede678 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rmarker
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:01:18 +1030
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang-format] Add ShortReturnTypeColumn option.
---
clang/docs
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -922,8 +922,23 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// };
/// int f();
/// int f() { return 1; }
+/// int f::
+/// bar();
/// \endcode
RTBS_None,
+/// Break after return t
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78304
>From 9846f970b6b394ccc3af25b92f238377a8ae7807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Hahn
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:06:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LV] Improve AnyOf reduction codegen.
Update AnyOf reduction cod
RamaMalladiAWS wrote:
> @RamaMalladiAWS Do you have examples of the IR that fails to lower to BFI?
> These things often turn out to be either a missing middle-end
> canonicalization or maybe a case that could be added to existing pattern
> matching in the back-end.
Yes, @RKSimon, I will try t
@@ -922,8 +922,23 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// };
/// int f();
/// int f() { return 1; }
+/// int f::
rmarker wrote:
Ah, that is nice.
The long names required to get the behaviour naturally
@@ -922,8 +922,23 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// };
/// int f();
/// int f() { return 1; }
+/// int f::
+/// bar();
/// \endcode
RTBS_None,
+/// Break after return t
https://github.com/carlos4242 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79037
>From a78545315baf3d920f7101f44c6dba05238dbcf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Peto
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:20:48 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] - Sema::isSimpleTypeSpecifier return true for
_Bo
https://github.com/asb created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79811
The Zicond extension was ratified in the last few months, with no changes that
affect the LLVM implementation. Although there's surely more tuning that could
be done about when to select Zicond or not, there are no k
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alex Bradbury (asb)
Changes
The Zicond extension was ratified in the last few months, with no changes that
affect the LLVM implementation. Although there's surely more tuning that could
be done about when
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 23b233c8adad5b81e185e50d04356fab64c2f870
cf5c3432f66b36db0b8283a967b24686433cdf63 --
https://github.com/asb updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79811
>From cf5c3432f66b36db0b8283a967b24686433cdf63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Bradbury
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 08:50:35 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Graduate Zicond to non-experimental
The Zicond extension
1 - 100 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
