https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-06-20T23:53:07-07:00
New Revision: 874dcaea09171100de02fa6d5c0af0669aea900f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/874dcaea09171100de02fa6d5c0af0669aea900f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/874dcaea09171100de02fa6d5c0af0669aea900f.diff
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ def FminF16F128 : Builtin, F16F128MathTemplate {
let Prototype = "T(T, T)";
}
+def FmaximumNumF16F128 : Builtin, F16F128MathTemplate {
+ let Spellings = ["__builtin_fmaximum_num"];
+ let Attributes = [FunctionWithBuiltinPrefix, NoThrow, Const, Constexp
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM then.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
It looks like this PR was merged without being approved, and I also couldn't
find the corresponding RFC for this addition on discourse. I've reverted it for
now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93841
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss approved this pull request.
LGTM, Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96259
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
> > > This looks generally good.
>
> Which tests are still failing?
OK. 12c0281f8c73bc1aa20d1517357e0e12c3f8bb4e has fixed these failures. If this
PR is applied as well, applying
https://github.com/MaskRay/llvm-project/tree/hashing-seed will not cause
`check-clang` failures.
h
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: YunQiang Su (wzssyqa)
Changes
We just introduce llvm.minimumnum and llvm.maximumnum intrinsics support to
llvm. Let's support them in Clang.
See: #93033
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281.diff
6 Files Affect
https://github.com/wzssyqa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
We just introduce llvm.minimumnum and llvm.maximumnum intrinsics support to
llvm. Let's support them in Clang.
See: #93033
>From 5605426ee61ec58cad701103a43922b67792ccaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang
tbaederr wrote:
> I tried out this WIP on our codebase after we ran into a problem where an
> annotation was added to a definition rather than a declaration, leading to a
> (silently) missed capability check.
>
> This addition seems to work fine, but it triggers warnings when annotations
> ar
Fznamznon wrote:
According to the bots that worked!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95802
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-06-20T23:26:15-07:00
New Revision: 12c0281f8c73bc1aa20d1517357e0e12c3f8bb4e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12c0281f8c73bc1aa20d1517357e0e12c3f8bb4e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12c0281f8c73bc1aa20d1517357e0e12c3f8bb4e.diff
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-06-20T22:46:47-07:00
New Revision: 62abd9a6f6fecaebb5aaac7720622f4ca13b3e45
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62abd9a6f6fecaebb5aaac7720622f4ca13b3e45
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62abd9a6f6fecaebb5aaac7720622f4ca13b3e45.diff
bhandarkar-pranav wrote:
@Meinersbur, @ergawy, @skatrak - Could you please give this another look. I
have updated the testcase `target-depend.f90` because the previous version was
flaky; I had used `depend` incorrectly which I have fixed now. (Previously,
`depend` was used on tasks that were
https://github.com/bhandarkar-pranav edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93977
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MalaySanghi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Malay Sanghi
Date: 2024-06-21T13:09:47+08:00
New Revision: 348240362f9673c824c0ad22fd9e13ae3f937864
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/348240362f9673c824c0ad22fd9e13ae3f937864
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/348240362f9673c824c0ad22fd9e13ae3f937864.diff
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-06-21T06:52:31+02:00
New Revision: cfd202141069809c3c65b8b49d3896f44ff10a6a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cfd202141069809c3c65b8b49d3896f44ff10a6a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cfd202141069809c3c65b8b49d3896f44ff10a6a.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-06-20T21:45:40-07:00
New Revision: 255986e27fcf9f0b36f7a23fbe030fcca1ba0249
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/255986e27fcf9f0b36f7a23fbe030fcca1ba0249
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/255986e27fcf9f0b36f7a23fbe030fcca1ba0249.diff
https://github.com/dyung edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -798,6 +804,12 @@
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. opcode {{[0-9]+}} is aliased to {{[0-9]+}}
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. type index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate
detected
# DEBUG-NEXT: .. imm index coverage check SKIPPED: user-defined predicate
detected
+# DEBUG-NEXT: G_VECREDUCE_F
MaskRay wrote:
- [ ] Clang :: APINotes/module-cache.m
- [ ] Clang :: Driver/cuda-bindings.cu
- [ ] Clang :: Driver/cuda-phases.cu
- [ ] Clang :: Driver/hip-phases.hip
- [ ] Clang :: Driver/hip-toolchain-no-rdc.hip
- [ ] Clang :: Driver/openmp-system-arch.c
- [ ] Clang :: Modules/Rmodule-bu
https://github.com/wzssyqa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
>From 23844cd8b8fad07bce0c34f58430322090c5a793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:25:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Add diagnostic notes for implcitly generated
deductio
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
>From 23844cd8b8fad07bce0c34f58430322090c5a793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:25:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Add diagnostic notes for implcitly generated
deductio
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
>From 23844cd8b8fad07bce0c34f58430322090c5a793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:25:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Add diagnostic notes for implcitly generated
deductio
https://github.com/jacquesguan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jianjian Guan
Date: 2024-06-21T11:11:10+08:00
New Revision: 762546565173e27b1851dfd1f3bfcc7fc847a2f9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/762546565173e27b1851dfd1f3bfcc7fc847a2f9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/762546565173e27b1851dfd1f3bfcc7fc847a2f9.diff
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-06-21T11:04:53+08:00
New Revision: e6486030340ea5756bec43a633567ed6411668c3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6486030340ea5756bec43a633567ed6411668c3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6486030340ea5756bec43a633567ed6411668c3.diff
LO
h-vetinari wrote:
> Actually, I think some of the libunwind failures on BuildKite are legitimate.
> See https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/35920.
Yeah, it looks like the picolib-noexceptions build is _still_ trying to
actually build the exceptions, and then fails to find the s
https://github.com/MaxEW707 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Max Winkler
Date: 2024-06-20T19:49:17-07:00
New Revision: 7b906d46f6e6915f32718dd5b313ba47a7cec259
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b906d46f6e6915f32718dd5b313ba47a7cec259
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b906d46f6e6915f32718dd5b313ba47a7cec259.diff
L
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > This looks generally good.
> > > Some check-clang-modules tests still fail (@ChuanqiXu9)
> >
> >
> > What does this mean? Do you mean there are some failures after this patch?
> > What are they? Or are these tests failing before this patch?
>
> When https://github.com/Ma
https://github.com/owenca edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96271
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96271
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96271.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+5)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp (+
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96271
None
>From 44eec3e8d4bec1de03428d42dce98a998f282825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:38:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Annotate r_paren before braced list as
TT_CastRPa
vfdff wrote:
hi @efriedma-quic, I surprise to find there are 4 new failed tests with new
commit 9990877a2 because **timeout**, but the change seems tiny, need some time
to figure out the reason. If you have any suggestions, it's also very welcome.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/9602
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96128
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-06-20T18:59:23-07:00
New Revision: 749876e8e5e505c2c635ab37d2006d7d0ea87f37
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/749876e8e5e505c2c635ab37d2006d7d0ea87f37
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/749876e8e5e505c2c635ab37d2006d7d0ea87f37.diff
LOG:
@@ -9192,7 +9194,7 @@ ComputeDefaultedComparisonExceptionSpec(Sema &S,
SourceLocation Loc,
EnterExpressionEvaluationContext Context(
S, Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext::Unevaluated);
-CXXRecordDecl *RD = cast(FD->getLexicalParent());
+auto RD = getRecord
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > Yeah, I think this patch may be conceptually good except the extra memory
> > using. But benchmarking, I tried it locally but didn't find observable
> > effects. So I'd like to land this after 19's branching to give it more
> > baking time.
>
> Do you mean that no large
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92511
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-06-21T09:21:40+08:00
New Revision: 03921b979d67657bfc9cf8240add2484cc4df6a7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03921b979d67657bfc9cf8240add2484cc4df6a7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03921b979d67657bfc9cf8240add2484cc4df6a7.diff
LO
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Thanks for reviewing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92511
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96262.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/AMDGPU.cpp (+6)
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/AMDGPU.h (+3)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96262.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/AMDGPU.cpp (+6)
- (modified)
https://github.com/yxsamliu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96262
None
>From 16659ca492234b234cc5da2f36563e1d8009620f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yaxun (Sam) Liu"
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:00:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Enable ASAN in amdgpu toolchain for OpenCL
---
clang
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (antangelo)
Changes
These registers include:
- X19, used by LLVM as the base pointer
- X15 on Windows, where it is used for stack allocation. It can still be used
on Linux/Darwin
- Adjust FrameLowering scratch register code to not ass
https://github.com/antangelo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96259
These registers include:
- X19, used by LLVM as the base pointer
- X15 on Windows, where it is used for stack allocation. It can still be used
on Linux/Darwin
- Adjust FrameLowering scratch register code to not
@@ -241,6 +238,13 @@ TPLa a;
} // namespace Thirteen
+namespace Fourteen {
+template
+int A = T();
+
+using enum A; // expected-error {{A is not an enumerated type}}
+} // namespace Fourteen
Endilll wrote:
Yes. If you look at the rest of the file, you'll see
@@ -148,13 +148,10 @@ template struct C {
enum class D { d,
e,
f };
- using enum D;
-
- static constexpr int W = int(f) + I;
+ using enum D; // expected-error {{using-enum cannot name a dependent type}}
Endilll wrote:
Ye
https://github.com/arichardson commented:
Since I believe the CMake minimum version supports this, I don't see why we
shouldn't submit this cleanup. Whether to change the flag detection logic can
be a separate discussion IMO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96171
dwblaikie wrote:
I think my last comment/question is still open? How/why did the symbol name end
up dropping any llvm/clang component to avoid collisions with other names?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cf
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95399
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -148,13 +148,10 @@ template struct C {
enum class D { d,
e,
f };
- using enum D;
-
- static constexpr int W = int(f) + I;
+ using enum D; // expected-error {{using-enum cannot name a dependent type}}
shafik wrote:
It
@@ -241,6 +238,13 @@ TPLa a;
} // namespace Thirteen
+namespace Fourteen {
+template
+int A = T();
+
+using enum A; // expected-error {{A is not an enumerated type}}
+} // namespace Fourteen
shafik wrote:
What does `Fourteen` stand for here or is it just a u
https://github.com/shafik edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95399
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87578
>From 3960050439964fe3c0536696490b284a6c470cd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:15:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] implement binding type error for t/cbuffers and
rwbuffers
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87578
>From 3960050439964fe3c0536696490b284a6c470cd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:15:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] implement binding type error for t/cbuffers and
rwbuffers
https://github.com/h-vetinari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96171
>From 1df587efeb71fb1929667f008d7e9b251863d9d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Vetinari"
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:43:31 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [cmake] switch to CMake's native check_linker_flag,
delet
https://github.com/rapidsna closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95964
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yeoul Na
Date: 2024-06-20T15:54:25-07:00
New Revision: f47778455d28285341d0eeceb53ae7cd95d07d36
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f47778455d28285341d0eeceb53ae7cd95d07d36
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f47778455d28285341d0eeceb53ae7cd95d07d36.diff
LOG:
var-const wrote:
@dwblaikie @ahatanak Is there anything we can do to move this patch forward? It
seems like it's almost ready to go with perhaps one remaining thread of
conversation to address. We badly need this functionality in libc++, the lack
of error messages when a hardening check is tri
shafik wrote:
Looks like this is ready to land, if you have reached out to the Fuchsia and XL
folks you should be good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: James Y Knight (jyknight)
Changes
Remove support for 3DNow!, both intrinsics and builtins.
This set of instructions was only supported by AMD chips starting in
the K6-2 (introduced 1998), and befor
shafik wrote:
Is this ready to land?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2012,26 +2015,27 @@ llvm::Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitLoadOfScalar(Address
Addr, bool Volatile,
}
llvm::Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitToMemory(llvm::Value *Value, QualType Ty) {
- // Bool has a different representation in memory than in registers.
- if (hasBooleanRepresen
nico wrote:
Looks Like this might break tests: http://45.33.8.238/linux/141118/step_7.txt
Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94717
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+// RUN: %clang -Wno-constant-conversion -Wno-array-bounds
-Wno-division-by-zero -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-shift-count-negative
-Wno-int-to-pointer-cast -O0
-fsanitize=alignment,array-bounds,bool,float-cast-overflow,implicit-integer-sign-change,implicit-s
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+// RUN: %clang -Wno-constant-conversion -Wno-array-bounds
-Wno-division-by-zero -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-shift-count-negative
-Wno-int-to-pointer-cast -O0
-fsanitize=alignment,array-bounds,bool,float-cast-overflow,implicit-integer-sign-change,implicit-s
https://github.com/dmcardle edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95290
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dmcardle updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95290
>From dc8e7b16d5e7318819e61223aa2fc9f483998806 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan McArdle
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:43:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][ThreadSafety] Check trylock function success and
return t
@@ -614,9 +619,23 @@ static bool checkTryLockFunAttrCommon(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL,
return false;
}
- // check that all arguments are lockable objects
+ // Check that all remaining arguments are lockable objects.
checkAttrArgsAreCapabilityObjs(S, D,
@@ -614,9 +619,23 @@ static bool checkTryLockFunAttrCommon(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL,
return false;
}
- // check that all arguments are lockable objects
+ // Check that all remaining arguments are lockable objects.
checkAttrArgsAreCapabilityObjs(S, D,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (earnol)
Changes
Without this patch compiler-rt ubsan library has a bug displaying incorrect
values for variables of the _BitInt (previously called _ExtInt) type. This
patch affects
https://github.com/earnol created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96240
Without this patch compiler-rt ubsan library has a bug displaying incorrect
values for variables of the _BitInt (previously called _ExtInt) type. This
patch affects affects both: generation of metadata inside cod
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo. Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account. See
[LLVM
Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hidden-email
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (earnol)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#93612 due to the issues with ppc64le platform.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96239.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (m
https://github.com/earnol created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96239
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#93612 due to the issues with ppc64le platform.
>From 508bc2e44b59c26955e9b1226f84b4ff2cc05fee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: earnol
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:39:06 -0400
Subject: [PATCH]
earnol wrote:
Yes. It is indeed the cause. Already created a code to address the the issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
AlexisPerry wrote:
I have lost my upstream commit privileges due to inactivity, so once this is
fully approved, could someone merge it on my behalf? Thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
https://github.com/AlexisPerry updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95043
>From 2312d31b14aecc6eeea2e81d221ee004e5de3efc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Perry-Holby
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 14:02:52 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [flang] Add basic -mtune support
---
clang/includ
https://github.com/AlexisPerry edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95043
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AlexisPerry wrote:
I hear you. I modeled this test closely after target-features-*.f90 in that
same directory, which is why I put it in flang/test/Lower. I am willing to
move it to flang/test/Driver, but if I do so should I also move the
target-features-*.f
@@ -411,6 +412,13 @@ void Flang::addTargetOptions(const ArgList &Args,
}
// TODO: Add target specific flags, ABI, mtune option etc.
+ if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mtune_EQ)) {
+CmdArgs.push_back("-tune-cpu");
+if (strcmp(A->getValue(), "native")
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+; RUN: mlir-translate -import-llvm -split-input-file %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: llvm.func @tune_cpu()
+; CHECK-SAME: tune_cpu = "pentium4"
AlexisPerry wrote:
>From what I can see, L1685 of ModuleImport.cpp has tune-cpu listed among the
@@ -17,7 +25,7 @@
// CPP-CHECK-NEXT:[[TMP1:%.*]] = shl nuw nsw i64 [[TMP0]], 4
// CPP-CHECK-NEXT:ret i64 [[TMP1]]
//
-uint64_t test_svcntb()
+uint64_t test_svcntb(void) MODE_ATTR
aemerson wrote:
Why is that restriction there? We often run into confusio
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify -x c -std=c23 %s
+
+#if !__has_attribute(nonblocking)
+#error "the 'nonblocking' attribute is not available"
+#endif
+
+// --- ATTRIBUTE SYNT
fmayer wrote:
Breakage looks related: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/72/builds/265
```
FAIL: UBSan-MemorySanitizer-powerpc64le :: TestCases/Integer/bit-int.c (4716 of
4745)
TEST 'UBSan-MemorySanitizer-powerpc64le ::
TestCases/Integer/bit-int.c' FAILED ***
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify -x c -std=c23 %s
+
+#if !__has_attribute(nonblocking)
+#error "the 'nonblocking' attribute is not available"
+#endif
+
+// --- ATTRIBUTE SYNT
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96120
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -803,6 +803,60 @@ void ContinuationIndenter::addTokenOnCurrentLine(LineState
&State, bool DryRun,
return !Tok.Previous->isOneOf(TT_CastRParen, tok::kw_for, tok::kw_while,
tok::kw_switch);
};
+ // Detecting functions is brittle. It wo
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@earnol Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a build,
https://github.com/earnol closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: earnol
Date: 2024-06-20T16:31:32-04:00
New Revision: 49001d584c69726eb7b5069468c5216da3fc3263
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/49001d584c69726eb7b5069468c5216da3fc3263
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/49001d584c69726eb7b5069468c5216da3fc3263.diff
LOG: [
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@AaronBallman Thank you for your feedback. Do you think this needs to be
reviewed by someone else? I can't add reviewers myself :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/aheejin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93261
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
