@@ -2276,6 +2277,134 @@ static void DiagnoseNonTriviallyCopyableReason(Sema
&SemaRef,
SemaRef.Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::note_defined_here) << D;
}
+static bool hasMixedAccessSpecifier(const CXXRecordDecl *D) {
+ AccessSpecifier FirstAccess = AS_none;
+ for (const Field
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
>From 10b723750e120420970f864ebda05e0495d4632f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Implement diagnostics for why `std::is_standard_layout`
https://github.com/Backl1ght updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143244
>From a14625ba505416df42fb785f9205e56b408473b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Backl1ght
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 16:15:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] add visit check
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | 14
@@ -132,8 +133,41 @@ void jump_out_backwards() {
for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
if (i * j > 80)
goto before_the_loop;
- // CHECK-NOTES: [[@LINE-1]]:9: warning: avoid using 'goto' for flow
control
- // CHECK-NOTES: [[@LINE-8]]:1: note: label defined
yronglin wrote:
Do we also need to update `peekNextToken` in Lexer/TokenLexer?
> so the return value std::nullopt and tok::eof have two different meanings.
We depent std::nullopt to walk up in macro stack in `isNextTokenOneOf`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143898
@@ -132,8 +133,41 @@ void jump_out_backwards() {
for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
if (i * j > 80)
goto before_the_loop;
- // CHECK-NOTES: [[@LINE-1]]:9: warning: avoid using 'goto' for flow
control
- // CHECK-NOTES: [[@LINE-8]]:1: note: label defined
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143898
>From 373daed324ca99f0b327c424c64a101f7d0f99a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:46:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Add peekNextPPToken, makes peek next token
without side
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143898
>From 373daed324ca99f0b327c424c64a101f7d0f99a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:46:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Add peekNextPPToken, makes peek next token
without side
https://github.com/snarang181 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
snarang181 wrote:
Closing in favor of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/snarang181 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SahilPatidar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144064
>From 05943c9542cd89ae672ddc0f14514e0c7b1e0bd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SahilPatidar
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:07:56 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Re-Land: [Clang-Repl] Add support for out-of-process
exe
@@ -2886,6 +2887,16 @@ class CXXDestructorDecl : public CXXMethodDecl {
return getCanonicalDecl()->OperatorDelete;
}
+ const FunctionDecl *getOperatorGlobalDelete() const {
+return getCanonicalDecl()->OperatorGlobalDelete;
+ }
+
+ void setOperatorGlobalDelete(Func
@@ -1590,25 +1590,70 @@ namespace {
void EmitConditionalDtorDeleteCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
tahonermann wrote:
This function is only ever called for a deleting destructor (and when
`CXXStructorImplicitParamValue` is non-null). I don't think there is a
reaso
@@ -194,9 +217,31 @@ I::~I() { call_in_dtor(); }
// CHECK-MSABI32-LABEL: define {{.*}} @"??_GI@@UAEPAXI@Z"(
// CHECK-MSABI-NOT: call{{ }}
// CHECK-MSABI: load i32
-// CHECK-MSABI: icmp eq i32 {{.*}}, 0
-// CHECK-MSABI: br i1
+// CHECK-MSABI-NEXT: and i32 %[[IMP_PARAM:.*]], 4
+/
@@ -2886,6 +2887,16 @@ class CXXDestructorDecl : public CXXMethodDecl {
return getCanonicalDecl()->OperatorDelete;
}
+ const FunctionDecl *getOperatorGlobalDelete() const {
+return getCanonicalDecl()->OperatorGlobalDelete;
+ }
+
+ void setOperatorGlobalDelete(Func
@@ -46,6 +46,16 @@ Potentially Breaking Changes
``endbr64`` instruction at the labels named as possible branch
destinations, so it is not safe to use a register-controlled branch
instruction to branch to one. (In line with gcc.)
+- Scalar deleting destructors emitted by c
@@ -2886,6 +2887,16 @@ class CXXDestructorDecl : public CXXMethodDecl {
return getCanonicalDecl()->OperatorDelete;
}
+ const FunctionDecl *getOperatorGlobalDelete() const {
+return getCanonicalDecl()->OperatorGlobalDelete;
+ }
+
+ void setOperatorGlobalDelete(Func
@@ -11139,6 +11139,21 @@ bool Sema::CheckDestructor(CXXDestructorDecl
*Destructor) {
DiagnoseUseOfDecl(OperatorDelete, Loc);
MarkFunctionReferenced(Loc, OperatorDelete);
Destructor->setOperatorDelete(OperatorDelete, ThisArg);
+
+ if (isa(OperatorDelete)
https://github.com/tahonermann requested changes to this pull request.
Thanks for working on this @Fznamznon! I added some suggestions and comments,
most of which are minor. There are two concerns that must be addressed.
- The ABI impact suggests this change should be tied to `-fclang-abi-compat
https://github.com/tahonermann edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139566
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sirui Mu (Lancern)
Changes
This patch adds `side_effect` attribute to `cir.call` operation.
Other function call attributes will be added in later patches.
---
Patch is 23.70 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://githu
https://github.com/Lancern created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144201
This patch adds `side_effect` attribute to `cir.call` operation.
Other function call attributes will be added in later patches.
>From ccf7371db9793ac980093fb3a43f24a7e9b176e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Siru
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YexuanXiao edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -107,31 +107,39 @@ DependencyScanningFilesystemSharedCache::getShardForUID(
return CacheShards[Hash % NumShards];
}
-std::vector
-DependencyScanningFilesystemSharedCache::getInvalidNegativeStatCachedPaths(
+std::vector
+DependencyScanningFilesystemSharedCache::getInvalidE
denzor200 wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2276,6 +2277,134 @@ static void DiagnoseNonTriviallyCopyableReason(Sema
&SemaRef,
SemaRef.Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::note_defined_here) << D;
}
+static bool hasMixedAccessSpecifier(const CXXRecordDecl *D) {
+ AccessSpecifier FirstAccess = AS_none;
+ for (const Field
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --extra-arg -std=c++20 --output=%t --format=json
--executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/MyClass.json
+
+template
+concept Addable = requires(T a, T b) {
+ { a + b };
+};
+
+templat
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --extra-arg -std=c++20 --output=%t --format=json
--executor=standalone %s
ilovepi wrote:
Let’s try to mark it fail with filecheck. If that’s doesn’t work, I’m ok with
this.
https://github.c
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
Let, module some minor comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rnk wrote:
> Would it make sense to have a custom main for AllClangUnitTests and register
> all targets, just like clang driver does?
That sounds reasonable.
I toyed with the idea of putting the registration into a static initializer,
but it raises the question of where you put it. Putting it
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Erick Velez
Date: 2025-06-13T16:35:30-07:00
New Revision: 7f69cd578de899f8b00525a02d1fe25dab567bcf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7f69cd578de899f8b00525a02d1fe25dab567bcf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7f69cd578de899f8b00525a02d1fe25dab567bcf.diff
L
evelez7 wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jun 13, 11:33 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this
pull request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/143919).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143919
___
https://github.com/sarnex updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144172
>From f2800e445bc739aa23523bc92ea317b12755cbd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Sarnie, Nick"
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:21:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][ARM] Include arm_acle.h in intrin.h on supported
platfo
wlei-llvm wrote:
> Internally, we discovered that this patch breaks Boost as used by MySQL. I
> don't have a full external reproducer at the moment and I don't know whether
> the code is valid or not, but I wanted to give a heads up that we may need to
> revisit this. This seems like the kind
https://github.com/sarnex edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sarnex wrote:
Thanks, made https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144172, will publish it
early next week.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140910
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
https://github.com/sarnex created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144172
None
>From 7c5edb1f1140dc0d51a4b26be2e300a1eb6c5f43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Sarnie, Nick"
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:21:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][ARM] Include arm_acle.h in intrin.h on supported
rnk wrote:
Internally, we discovered that this patch breaks Boost as used by MySQL. I
don't have a full external reproducer at the moment and I don't know whether
the code is valid or not, but I wanted to give a heads up that we may need to
revisit this. This seems like the kind of incompatibi
https://github.com/sivadeilra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138972
>From a684405f4986e72d78dcfcf6accf4c3ae26b35f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arlie Davis
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 16:10:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Windows hotpatching support
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/
rnk wrote:
> To be clear you mean modify Clang's intrin.h to include arm_acle.h when on
> supported targets
Yep!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140910
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
@@ -329,6 +329,222 @@ emitArrayConstant(CIRGenModule &cgm, mlir::Type
desiredType,
return {};
}
+//===--===//
+// ConstantLValueEmitter
+//===---
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143814
>From a976da9d6033a252fab75de216fe6580d6e3e6ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:47:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Override `SPIRVTargetCodeGenInfo::supportsLibCall()` in
order
@@ -329,6 +329,222 @@ emitArrayConstant(CIRGenModule &cgm, mlir::Type
desiredType,
return {};
}
+//===--===//
+// ConstantLValueEmitter
+//===---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This change introduces a ConstantLValueEmitter class, which will be needed for
emitting CIR for non-trivial constant pointers. This change introduces the
class with most branch
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144165
This change introduces a ConstantLValueEmitter class, which will be needed for
emitting CIR for non-trivial constant pointers. This change introduces the
class with most branches reaching an NYI diagnostic.
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/builds/30747
Bigcheese wrote:
> LGTM. I think I would slightly prefer for
> `DependencyScanningWorkerFilesystem` to accept the entire service instead of
> its members (for the same reasons we do that in the worker, action, etc.)
I changed this, although now the tests need a service. I don't think that's a
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143919
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Bigcheese updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144000
>From d07ccf298fd3755036ec90e4cd7f1d1408c4506e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Spencer
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:13:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][scan-deps] Add option to disable caching stat
failu
topperc wrote:
> I think this feature is really tough, the arm/aarch64 backends have got too
> much complexity from similar features, mostly because their cpus have all
> their optional features enabled by default.
>
> I think if you can only enable additional extensions, that proposed syntax
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/30205
Here is t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/28377
Here is th
https://github.com/sivadeilra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138972
>From a684405f4986e72d78dcfcf6accf4c3ae26b35f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arlie Davis
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 16:10:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Windows hotpatching support
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian` running on `gribozavr4` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/2
https://github.com/pranavk approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144109
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --extra-arg -std=c++20 --output=%t --format=json
--executor=standalone %s
evelez7 wrote:
FileCheck is omitted here because since nothing is mapped, no file is created.
https://github.com/llvm
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144095
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1081,7 +1084,8 @@ int clang_scan_deps_main(int argc, char **argv, const
llvm::ToolContext &) {
};
DependencyScanningService Service(ScanMode, Format, OptimizeArgs,
-EagerLoadModules, /*TraceVFS=*/Verbose);
+
Author: Jacek Caban
Date: 2025-06-13T23:29:03+02:00
New Revision: 8229628cf1812e126ff72ee9f4b5f267db4c91da
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8229628cf1812e126ff72ee9f4b5f267db4c91da
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8229628cf1812e126ff72ee9f4b5f267db4c91da.diff
L
https://github.com/snarang181 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
None
>From 10b723750e120420970f864ebda05e0495d4632f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Implement diagnostics for why `std::is_standard_layout
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-release`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-release` while building `clang,flang,llvm` at
step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/172/b
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --extra-arg -std=c++20 --output=%t --format=json
--executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/MyClass.json
+
+template
+concept Addable = requires(T a, T b) {
+ { a + b };
+};
+
+templat
lenary wrote:
I think this feature is really tough, the arm/aarch64 backends have got too
much complexity from similar features, mostly because their cpus have all their
optional features enabled by default.
I think if you can only enable additional extensions, that proposed syntax
would prob
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Erick Velez (evelez7)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144160.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (added) clang-tools-extra/test/clang-doc/json/class-requires.cpp (+29)
- (added) clang-tools-extra/test
evelez7 wrote:
* **#144160** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/144160?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/1441
https://github.com/evelez7 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144160
None
>From ad20a26907b065ae6977dab7e0f5c2ef5e0c7ef0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:16:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Precommit concept tests
---
.../test/clang-doc
https://github.com/anthonyhatran edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143722
>From 6f787e1997f53968e23586b4eb03c45e6559ebbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 19:30:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add std layout diagnostics Add diagnostic test cases
---
https://github.com/anthonyhatran edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sivadeilra wrote:
I've added 2 cases that cover global redirection around phi nodes. And
thankfully it exposed one bug, which I've fixed.
For the rest of the constants, I think it's time to declare this a starting
point PR and not a final endpoint PR. It's not necessary for this to support
sarnex wrote:
@rnk To be clear you mean modify Clang's `intrin.h` to include `arm_acle.h`
when on supported targets, not the application code including `arm_acle.h`
directly right? If so I can make that change. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140910
__
@@ -4051,6 +4144,14 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitTrapCheck(llvm::Value *Checked,
llvm::BasicBlock *&TrapBB = TrapBBs[CheckHandlerID];
+ llvm::DILocation *TrapLocation = Builder.getCurrentDebugLocation();
+ llvm::StringRef Category = GetTrapMessageForHandler(CheckHandlerID
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143262
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-06-13T22:51:33+02:00
New Revision: f62a8ab9304fb8b8b3ac3519a7addd7d3d234b04
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f62a8ab9304fb8b8b3ac3519a7addd7d3d234b04
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f62a8ab9304fb8b8b3ac3519a7addd7d3d234b04.diff
LO
cjacek wrote:
Merged, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjacek closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jacek Caban
Date: 2025-06-13T22:48:29+02:00
New Revision: be5c96bfac328fed548c532bbe1710fe23460a85
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be5c96bfac328fed548c532bbe1710fe23460a85
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be5c96bfac328fed548c532bbe1710fe23460a85.diff
L
snarang181 wrote:
Something broke while resolving merge conflicts. Getting it back to a steady
state and will mark it ready for review again. Apologies.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
https://github.com/snarang181 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sivadeilra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138972
>From a684405f4986e72d78dcfcf6accf4c3ae26b35f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arlie Davis
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 16:10:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Windows hotpatching support
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Code
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
