We can wrap the random_device as a minstd_rand, a linear congruential
enginer that a lot of C lib uses for rand().
However based on documentation, we should just provides dummy
implementation which throws an exception in the constructor of
random_device [1,2]
But again, compared with run-time ex
It's a good idea. Currently, there are about 600+ "throws" being
guarded by _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS macro.
How about let's merge the patch now and I can do the conversion of
existing code to the wrapper in background?
Weiming
On 6/24/2016 1:25 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
grandinj added a subscri
Sorry, I was distracted by other issues after I uploaded the patch.
I will take another look of the implementation.
Thanks,
Weiming
On 9/12/2016 1:31 PM, Sam Shepperd wrote:
phabricss added a comment.
On 09/12/2016 01:26 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
Firstly, I thought glibc had applied a patch
I agree what you said about different code generated with clang and GCC
generates. In this case, we should throw an error (err_late_asm_label).
But in this example, there is no use of the function. They are just
redundant declarations and there is no actual code generated.
So I suggest we just
Sounds good. Will do.
Thanks for reviewing
On 4/8/2016 11:46 AM, Alex Rosenberg wrote:
alexr added a subscriber: alexr.
alexr added a comment.
There are multiple features in this patch that should be considered separately.
Please split the patch.
That said, I don't think we want to add a fun
