https://github.com/pogo59 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pogo59 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
>From e4c9272ee9cbb918347a23d2dce14c9c12765009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Robinson
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:50:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Headers][X86] Add macro descriptions to ia32intrin.h
These
@@ -411,13 +497,45 @@ __rdpmc(int __A) {
/// \param __A
///Address of where to store the 32-bit \c IA32_TSC_AUX value.
/// \returns The 64-bit value of the time stamp counter.
+/// \see _rdtsc
static __inline__ unsigned long long __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS
__rdtscp(unsigned int
@@ -411,13 +497,45 @@ __rdpmc(int __A) {
/// \param __A
///Address of where to store the 32-bit \c IA32_TSC_AUX value.
/// \returns The 64-bit value of the time stamp counter.
+/// \see _rdtsc
static __inline__ unsigned long long __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS
__rdtscp(unsigned int
https://github.com/phoebewang commented:
> Is _bswap (one underscore) a mistake? The [12.0 release
> notes](https://releases.llvm.org/12.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#x86-support-in-clang)
> say it has two underscores.
I think single underscore is correct, it conform the difination
https://github.com/phoebewang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pogo59 wrote:
> When a macro is merely an alternate name for an intrinsic function, does it
> want to be documented as its own intrinsic function? I assume yes in this
> patch, but if there's a different tactic that avoids duplicating a bunch of
> descriptions, I'm open to suggestions.
I
https://github.com/pogo59 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
>From e4c9272ee9cbb918347a23d2dce14c9c12765009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Robinson
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:50:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Headers][X86] Add macro descriptions to ia32intrin.h
These
pogo59 wrote:
Reviewer questions:
1. When a macro is merely an alternate name for an intrinsic function, does it
want to be documented as its own intrinsic function? I assume yes in this
patch, but if there's a different tactic that avoids duplicating a bunch of
descriptions, I'm open to
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Paul T Robinson (pogo59)
Changes
These are largely copy-pasted from the corresponding function descriptions.
Updated _rdtsc definition because it was just plain wrong.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613.diff
https://github.com/pogo59 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
These are largely copy-pasted from the corresponding function descriptions.
Updated _rdtsc definition because it was just plain wrong.
>From e4c9272ee9cbb918347a23d2dce14c9c12765009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
12 matches
Mail list logo
