@@ -707,7 +707,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+// The test may fail as time out on windows
+// REQUIRES: system-linux
+
+// RUN: %clang -S -O3 -emit-llvm -o - -x c++ %s | FileCheck %s
-check-prefixes=CHECK,
@@ -707,7 +707,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+// The test may fail as time out on windows
+// REQUIRES: system-linux
+
+// RUN: %clang -S -O3 -emit-llvm -o - -x c++ %s | FileCheck %s
-check-prefixes=CHECK,
vfdff wrote:
ping ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vfdff wrote:
hi, is there any new suggestion ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on
@@ -707,7 +707,39 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on
@@ -707,7 +707,39 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
@@ -707,7 +707,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on
vfdff wrote:
> It report error **Access tag metadata must have either 4 or 5 operands** with
> CGM.getTBAATypeInfo(Context.IntTy)
>
> ```
> p MDHelper.createTBAAScalarTypeNode("int", RootMD)
> <0xbe1f62a8> = !{!"int", <0xbddc68f8>, i64 0} -- return a Type
> descriptors
> p CGF.CGM.g
vfdff wrote:
It report error **Access tag metadata must have either 4 or 5 operands** with
CGM.getTBAATypeInfo(Context.IntTy)
```
p MDHelper.createTBAAScalarTypeNode("int", RootMD)
<0xbe1f62a8> = !{!"int", <0xbddc68f8>, i64 0} -- return a Type
descriptors
p CGF.CGM.getTBAATypeInfo(CG
@@ -707,7 +707,36 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
@@ -707,7 +707,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/vfdff deleted https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -707,7 +707,38 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on
https://github.com/vfdff edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -707,7 +707,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
efriedma-quic wrote:
I can't think of any obvious reason this would cause timeouts. I mean, you're
adding metadata to a bunch of functions, and if something handles that metadata
inefficiently, things could easily explode. But nothing specific comes to mind.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
@@ -707,7 +707,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
efriedma-quic wrote:
> > Can we restrict this to targets where libm actually modifies errno?
>
> Do you mean it is better to have a function list, which actually modifies
> `errno` ? For example, we should restrict to `__exp10`, but but not a general
> top call `__exp `?
I said targets, not f
vfdff wrote:
hi @efriedma-quic, I surprise to find there are 4 new failed tests with new
commit 9990877a2 because **timeout**, but the change seems tiny, need some time
to figure out the reason. If you have any suggestions, it's also very welcome.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/9602
https://github.com/vfdff edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -707,7 +707,38 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on
vfdff wrote:
> Can we restrict this to targets where libm actually modifies errno?
Do you mean it is better to have a function list, which actually modifies
`errno` ? For example, we should restrict to `__exp10`, but but not a general
top call `__exp `?
https://github.com/lattera/glibc/blob/89
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -707,7 +707,38 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
Ideally we could identify errno more precisely somehow, but I guess this is
better than nothing.
Can we restrict this to targets where libm actually modifies errno?
How does this interact with StrictFP?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/9602
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Allen (vfdff)
Changes
Base on the discussion
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/fp-can-we-add-pure-attribute-for-math-library-functions-default/79459,
math libcalls set errno, so it should emit "int" TBAA metadata on FP libcalls
to solve the a
https://github.com/vfdff created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
Base on the discussion
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/fp-can-we-add-pure-attribute-for-math-library-functions-default/79459,
math libcalls set errno, so it should emit "int" TBAA metadata on FP libcalls
to solve the
35 matches
Mail list logo
