I've created the two reivews on phabricator:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27438
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27440
Thanks!
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 at 11:01 Manuel Klimek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:53 PM Antonio Maiorano
> wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel,
>
> Okay,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:53 PM Antonio Maiorano wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> Okay, I'll submit both patches via phabricator as you recommend. I'll add
> you, and I'll add Hans Wennborg and Zachary Turner, who were both involved
> with the first clang-format-vsix patch I worked
Hi Manuel,
Okay, I'll submit both patches via phabricator as you recommend. I'll add
you, and I'll add Hans Wennborg and Zachary Turner, who were both involved
with the first clang-format-vsix patch I worked on:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161128/178569.html
Does
Awesome, thanks for working on this. If you submit the patches via
phabricator (http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html) I'll get to it faster
:) Feel free to directly add me as reviewer, btw (add 'klimek').
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 6:53 AM Antonio Maiorano via cfe-commits <
Hello,
I have two patches for clang-format-vsix to offer up for review:
0001-clang-format-vsix-versioning.patch
clang-format-vsix: add a date stamp to the VSIX version number to ensure
upgradability
Presently, the version number of the VSIX matches the LLVM version number.
However, as this