Author: adrian
Date: Thu Sep 17 10:58:54 2015
New Revision: 247895
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247895&view=rev
Log:
Fix a typo.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst
Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst?rev=247895&r1=247894&r2=247895&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst Thu Sep 17 10:58:54 2015
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ Modules are modeled as if each submodule
This behavior is currently only approximated when building a module with
submodules. Entities within a submodule that has already been built are visible
when building later submodules in that module. This can lead to fragile modules
that depend on the build order used for the submodules of the module, and
should not be relied upon. This behavior is subject to change.
-As an example, in C, this implies that if two structs are defined in different
submodules with the same name, those two types are distinct types (but may be
*compatible* types if their definitions match. In C++, two structs defined with
the same name in different submodules are the *same* type, and must be
equivalent under C++'s One Definition Rule.
+As an example, in C, this implies that if two structs are defined in different
submodules with the same name, those two types are distinct types (but may be
*compatible* types if their definitions match). In C++, two structs defined
with the same name in different submodules are the *same* type, and must be
equivalent under C++'s One Definition Rule.
.. note::
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
