This is probably it for now. It came to my attention that I was not
following best practices for the signature test (t/00-signature.t) so
this has been fixed in this release.
Also some unneeded dependencies have been removed from the generated
dists' build scripts and in M-S-P-CGIApp itself.
On 03/03/2010 05:58 PM, P Kishor wrote:
> I do use CAD in another application, and yes, that works rather well.
> For a number of reasons, I want to explore CAPRoute. In fact, one
> thing I don't like about CAD is that it breaks the (to me) established
> formula of extending a CA application's fun
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:56 -0600, P Kishor wrote:
>> A while back I attempted working with CAPRoutes, but failed. Today I
>> decided to revisit it, and failed again. In fact, I am failing at
>
> I've never used it. CGI::Application::Dispa
Hi
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:56 -0600, P Kishor wrote:
> A while back I attempted working with CAPRoutes, but failed. Today I
> decided to revisit it, and failed again. In fact, I am failing at
I've never used it. CGI::Application::Dispatch is superb, so that's what
I'm sticking with.
Not only th
A while back I attempted working with CAPRoutes, but failed. Today I
decided to revisit it, and failed again. In fact, I am failing at
getting the simplest possible application running with it, and I am
wondering -- either I am completely clueless about how this is
supposed to work, or this module
I've finally fixed the Windows issues and uploaded version 0.21 to CPAN.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
# CGI::Application community mailing list
####
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visi