On 2/6/08, Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another problem is bookmarks. A user may bookmark a page, but when they
come back a couple of days later, the session has expired. They might also
email a link to others, and that link may not work for the same reason.
If you want a poster child
On 1/20/08, Adrian Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess who didn't mean that to go to the whole list :-/
That's okay, I'm curious too. We're relocating to a new hosting
service on a faster box, and might could find some room if nobody else
has.
# CGI::Application community mailing list
On 1/3/08, Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Peters wrote:
Just saying something is copyrighted doesn't make it so :)
Er, assuming you're that actual author, why not?
(Under US law, and I think all the Berne signatories, as I understand
them. YMMV.)
Something is copyrighted the
On 1/2/08, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just saying something is copyrighted doesn't make it so :)
Continuously moving the copyright date is a pet peeve of mine, too.
Things are copyrighted when they're first committed to fixed form. You
don't get to keep moving the copyright date
On 1/2/08, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say that this made my day :) Although I'd probably =~ s/get/bribe/
Heh. I opted to keep the level at snark and not actionable.
Soapboxing aside, I suspect that the usual reason for updates is
either a simple misunderstanding of the
On 1/2/08, Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note also that the 3-character symbol (C) is not a copyright symbol in
some countries, e.g. Australia.
The US, as well. Copr. is the shortest legal way to represent it
here if you can't do a proper circled-C.
# CGI::Application community
On 1/1/08, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert,
I believe the page is not being rendered because of a missing bracket on the
opening tag for the title.
Good catch. Robert, you might want to try validating pages, like so:
On 10/19/07, Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it's just like a scab I keep picking at, though, and I should STFU.
I wouldn't quite put it that way. But I've always felt that
HTML::Template is to TT as Email::Simple is to Mail::Message. (It's
documented, in not quite those terms,
On 9/13/07, Jason Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't know about this - I just published a CGI::Application page:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?cgi_application
Which is linked to from here:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?web_frameworks
When more people
On 9/12/07, Jason Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you or someone should publish a similar series of columns
(unless they already exist) that does the same? As someone who is happy
with MIME::Lite, blissfully unaware of its problems and shortcomings and
jammed with work, I'm not
On 2/13/07, Robert Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in seeing how many use TT vs HT.
HT exclusively.
11 matches
Mail list logo
