Thanks, Yuvaraj. I reckon your 2¢ is worth at least 2 bitcoins! :-D
December 2017! That's really timely.
I recall back in the 80s a leading commentator grousing that C++ was being
used for mission-critical applications before the ANSI standard had been
fully worked out. Then I watched as machine
That's why most people give up on chatting to anyone outside their own
little circle.
It's one response to the challenge.
And why I always felt international mathematics conferences were a waste of
time
(unless you were the invited speaker at a plenary session).
There was nobody you could talk
When in grade school they called things like + and - "operators". But they
never defined it. Then in trig thay had "functions", but they never defined
what functions were either. Then came calculus. Differentiating and
integrating were never given a group name or general classification. I
think
Hi Ian,
Have you considered looking into C++ Glossary
http://www.stroustrup.com/glossary.html ? I enjoyed "The Annotated C++
Reference Manual" when I was learning C++ for the first time.
C++ is an established ISO standard - latest being granted in December 2017
as *ISO/IEC 14882
Too right, Devon.
And have you explored the unicode situation with minus? Not to mention pi
and mu.
If programmers coded like they talk and write, planes would be dropping on
our heads from all over the sky.
I knew folk who'd never read a manual or an article about a novel language.
And they
I did once ask a fellow, knowledgable programmer if the distinction between
function and operator in conventional languages in fact meant "with which
alphabet do you spell it?"
If it's a plain old ASCII name, like "plus", it's a function; a symbol like
"+" is an operator, even if both tokens
> it does not match my understanding of how standards bodies work
However they work, they don't seem to produce a leading answer to a leading
question.
Before posting my appeal, I googled variants of "ISO computer terminology".
I got the impression there were over 30 ISO committees dealing with
Like Fire Island here:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Fire+Island,+NY/@40.6999706,-73.1614613,11z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x89e81153da534b8f:0x63032a1963b35f70!8m2!3d40.6475997!4d-73.1459474
?
(In case gmail mangles this, search for "Fire Island" on gmaps.)
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:33 PM,
Yes - I own a copy of that very volume, purchased for me by my friend Jim
Korn, for that purpose but the NuVoc detailed pages had enough of that idea
that I felt no need to slavishly reproduce the older example.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Ian Clark wrote:
> Sandra
Sandra Pakin, and Ray Polivka, authored a number of good introductory &
reference books for APL.
Thanks for reminding me, Devon.
Google (bless its little cotton socks) was most helpful. There's an online
copy of the APL\360 Reference Manual here:
it has never been considerated a good idea to build on sand.
On 7 Mar 2018 19:17, "David Lambert" wrote:
> https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/weaker-gulf-stream-means-t
> rouble-coastal-new-england
>
> This is the cat6 wunderblog started by Jeff Masters of wunderground,
>
https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/weaker-gulf-stream-means-trouble-coastal-new-england
This is the cat6 wunderblog started by Jeff Masters of wunderground,
bought by weather.com, bought by IBM.
Soon they'll be coding in APL & j!?
12 matches
Mail list logo