[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] JRE License

2001-05-02 Thread Mr . Bad
B == Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Me Not to mention that it's distasteful from an information Me freedom perspective. Here we have Freenet, which enables one to Me redistribute stuff far and wide, but we're asking users not to Me distribute the program itself? Seems kind

Re: [Freenet-chat] Freenet Newbie, Semi-capable Linux User, Directory Insertion Question

2001-05-02 Thread Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 12:14:38 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aaron P Ingebrigtsen (Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 04:53:10PM -0700): If I go do dos and type start it will say that it cannot find the file or command. So what are you talking about? strange... i can remember the old

Re: [Freenet-chat] Freenet Newbie, Semi-capable Linux User, Directory Insertion Question

2001-05-02 Thread Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 12:14:38 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aaron P Ingebrigtsen (Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 04:53:10PM -0700): If I go do dos and type start it will say that it cannot find the file or command. So what are you talking about? strange... i can remember the old

[freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)

2001-05-02 Thread David McNab
D. McNab is compelled to move to Colorado, where he's made to do punitive labor putting Keep this Bag Away From Small Children onto plastic Piggly-Wiggly bags. This is one thing that Rebirthing and Freenet have in common - they both strive to restore power to the individual, and incur wrath

[freenet-chat] In-freenet Freegle

2001-05-02 Thread David McNab
Sorry if I'm behind in this, but I just checked out the client side in-freenet Freegle. http://127.0.0.1:8081/MSK@SSK@z~K65pjGmzBU8rlD7rzu9NoYecsQAgE/freegle//applet.html Looks damn good - definitely a step in the right direction.

RE: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities

2001-05-02 Thread Stuart Horner
I think that this was theoretical news report that could happen. Stuart -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron P Ingebrigtsen Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Legal

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)

2001-05-02 Thread Tavin Cole
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:40:01PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: MJR == Mark J Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AI This is total crap. This is a kangaroo court and this guy is AI getting railroaded!!! AI I am very angry about this, as you can see. MJR You must have some

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Anyone know what happened to www.freegle.com?

2001-05-02 Thread Don Marti
begin Stefan Reich quotation of Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:06:42PM +0200: -fairly cheap dedicated servers or -companies that might be interested to sponsor freegle by providing server (all I need is a Java environment and MySQL) and bandwidth, I'd be more than happy to hear about it. The

Re: [freenet-chat] Thanks for FCP

2001-05-02 Thread Tavin Cole
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:30:20PM +1200, David McNab wrote: Just a note of thanks to those who conceived of, and those who developed, the FCP interface. I've been hitting FCP pretty hard, and it comes up smiling every time :) FCP is enabling me to chop the dreaded JNI interface out of the

Re: [freenet-chat] Thanks for FCP

2001-05-02 Thread Tavin Cole
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:58:29PM +1200, David McNab wrote: Does this mean that existing Freesites will break, and will need to be re-insertted in the new metadata mapfile format? It would mean that, if it were possible for any data to survive the transition to 0.4 ;) -- # tavin cole # #

[freenet-chat] Security - Legal Precaution

2001-05-02 Thread David McNab
Hi all, After my flight of paranoia, I've put my whole Freenet data store on an encrypted PGP disk. This means that if my PC is powered down (eg in the course of being confiscated), there'll be no way of accessing the Freenet datastore without a valid passphrase - not even with valid

Re: [freenet-chat] 0,4 release date (was: Thanks for FCP)

2001-05-02 Thread Tavin Cole
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 04:49:11PM +1200, David McNab wrote: Just another question - is there a projected release date for 0.4? Or a general feeling of how long? It's really almost ready for early testing. The major missing chunks are the announcement protocol, the revisions to key generation