Re: [freenet-chat] [OT] S/W used for webinstaller?

2003-01-12 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Does anyone happen to know what software is used for the freenet > webinstaller? or is it a custom app? It's using the Nullsoft Installer 1.98 which has been recompiled with logging enabled. The installer then run

[freenet-chat] windows 0.5.0.2 online

2002-10-29 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've uploaded 0.5.0.2 monolithic and webinstalls. Both distributions have changed. There is better text (re: deleting temp directory), automatic setting of idle priority, and a localhost fix to get rid of all those pesky entries. Everyone should download this if just for the idle priority changes.

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5rc2

2002-10-26 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The (second) hopefully final prerelease of Freenet 0.5, the first > "stable" release in far too long, is ready. Linux users may download it > from > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5rc1.tgz?download >

[freenet-chat] freenet 0.5rc1 windows installer packaged

2002-10-24 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've bundled up the rc1 installers. The webinstaller has almost no changes - just some strings modified to point to the new direcotries. The full installer on the other hand has quite a few changes to bring it up to where the web installer was last night. http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freene

[freenet-chat] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

2002-10-23 Thread Mathew Ryden
I just bundled up my latest build of the installer. Changes since the last release: I added a warning to the systray app for when the temporary directory cannot be created. Hopefully fixed a problem when an upgrade installation fails (ie: while downloading the jar's), it doesn't leave the configur

[freenet-chat] Yet another windows installer release

2002-10-23 Thread Mathew Ryden
Been busy - fixed a bug in not overwriting jar's on upgrade (using installer, not upgrader) Upgrader should work. Usual place. Test it (full install coming up in ~ 4 hours) -Mathew ___ chat mailing list chat at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetpr

[freenet-chat] Yet another windows installer release

2002-10-23 Thread Mathew Ryden
Been busy - fixed a bug in not overwriting jar's on upgrade (using installer, not upgrader) Upgrader should work. Usual place. Test it (full install coming up in ~ 4 hours) -Mathew ___ chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org

[freenet-chat] Re: yet another another new windows installer

2002-10-21 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Mathew Ryden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm sure everyone's getting sick of me telling them this, but there is a new > windows installer up. > I changed the noderef file to the one on sourceforge, as well as tried to > updat

[freenet-chat] yet another another new windows installer

2002-10-21 Thread Mathew Ryden
I'm sure everyone's getting sick of me telling them this, but there is a new windows installer up. I changed the noderef file to the one on sourceforge, as well as tried to update the updater. I still can't get it to work here, but I have no way of telling what is causing that - be it my internet c

[freenet-chat] Yet another freenet windows release

2002-10-20 Thread Mathew Ryden
Okay - let's see if this has gotten any better. I think the weird flaunch.ini bugs are fixed so the node might almost work. Please, anyone who I haven't turned off of freenet entirely, test the again updated installer at http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe . Also, send any

[freenet-chat] Yet another windows release

2002-10-19 Thread Mathew Ryden
Here's another windows-webinstall.exe release. This should hopefully fix the "javafind found java, then install told me it still couldn't find java" problems. Also some changes on temporary directory settings to allow one setting for them all. Everyone, please download and test it (save your freen

[freenet-chat] windows pre5 installer

2002-10-18 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've put up the new windows installer on http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe . The main differences in this release are: * No longer sets ipAddress='internal name' * No more nodeStatus errors * Changed rtMaxRefs to 100 and changed info in freenet.ini * No MFC70 stuff (overall

Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content

2001-07-16 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just > > keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4? > Upside down speak you. > > Anyway, the 0.

Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks lots of software

2001-07-15 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:41 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks lots of software > The problem could be solved **SO** simply. > > Let's assign two meanings to the single slash. > > 1) A

Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks wget et al.

2001-07-15 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "//" is the prettiest, cleanest identifier for > > denoting cdoc msk handling that I have seen. > > Again, '//' breaks a lot of third-party http software. > Some software chokes when it sees '//'. > Other software edits it t

Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks wget et al.

2001-07-15 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Volker Stolz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In local.freenet, you wrote: > > I have noticed this... so I started using the > > Freenet.client.RequestClient shipped with freenet.jar... > > Yes, but it would require grabbing the start page and getting perl > to extract

Re: [freenet-chat] Freenet Tsunami

2001-07-12 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Michael Carmack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 04:31:43PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > > > Freenet's recent 'tsunami' of the last 24-36 hours seems to have lifted. > > > > (Ok then, who's been inserting gigs of data at high htls?) > > I've been

Re: [freenet-chat] PGP signatures

2001-06-01 Thread Mathew Ryden
From: "Aaron P Ingebrigtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 31 May 2001 07:45:40 -0500 "Mathew Ryden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > > then you are seeing the effect of someone who didn't use an > > algorithm > > optomized for spe

Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast!

2001-05-31 Thread Mathew Ryden
From: "Timm Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 0.4 will be getting rid of inform.php and replacing it with a more scaleable > in-freenet alternative. You will need the address of at least one node that > you trust before you can enter the network (just as you need the address of a > news server before

Re: [freenet-chat] PGP signatures

2001-05-31 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Aaron P Ingebrigtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 31 May 2001 02:14:53 -0500 "Mathew Ryden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > > Are we talking about PGP or UC2 here? If pgp, you either have a very > > slow >

Re: [freenet-chat] PGP signatures

2001-05-30 Thread Mathew Ryden
From: "Aaron P Ingebrigtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > When I tried to encrypt a 500+ megabyte archive it spent a half hour just > trying to hash out the two crypto-random numbers, then it spent 10 hours > trying to encrypt the huge file and it never finished, because I canceled > the process. If i

Re: [freenet-chat] PGP signatures

2001-05-30 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Aaron P Ingebrigtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > But the signature IS encrypted, otherwise you would be able to extract > the data no matter what file you point it at, and the text of the > signature would never change no matter what file or message you sign. I >

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-22 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Good. So if write a utility to search for *.mp3, *.mpg and *.zip files in > the Freenet directory it will come up with precisely nothing? Yup. > Ever? Yup. :) > Because, if that's the case, I need have no concerns about

Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering

2001-05-22 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:53 PM Subject: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering > Hi all, > > I'm learning to program and thinking of using Freenet as a back-up resource > in a project I

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Memory Leak...?

2001-05-13 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael D. Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 6:27 PM Subject: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Memory Leak...? > From: "Michael D. Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hello,

Re: [freenet-chat] counld not find main class

2001-05-13 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Kevin Xiong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > always get an error: "counld not find main class' on my windows2000 > Server when click to run freenet.Java is fine. > how come? Are you running windows freenet 0.3.9.1-1? There was a problem with 0.3.9.1 for windows. > Tha

Re: [freenet-chat] Duhh!!

2001-05-12 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Please ignore my previous message. > I just realised the consequences of posting to a freenetproject.org mailing > list to tell people that freenetproject.org is down ;p =) You are forgiven -Mathew ___

Re: [freenet-chat] Never Ceases to Amaze Me...

2001-05-08 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ...what gets on Slashdot about Freenet: > > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/08/0052200&mode=thread > > FreeSQL seems like a cool project and all, no mistake. It's got to be > the most ambitious application built on

[freenet-chat] freeweb source

2001-04-29 Thread Mathew Ryden
While reading Ian's comment on freeweb being a thin layer over freenetmirror, a thought occured to me. freenetmirror is GPL. freeweb somehow uses freenetmirror. (david explained it uses jni) IANAL, but logic follows that freeweb needs to be gpl due to the the viral aspects of the gpl. David: y