In local.freenet, you wrote:
Again, I repeat, '//' is good.
freenet:MSK@foo// is.
http://localhost:8081/freenet:MSK@foo// ain't.
--
Volker Stolz * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * PGP + S/MIME
___
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:46:23PM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
In local.freenet, you wrote:
Again, I repeat, '//' is good.
freenet:MSK@foo// is.
http://localhost:8081/freenet:MSK@foo// ain't.
I think in the final analysis we cannot base our decision on what
happens to it when it's placed
From: Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think in the final analysis we cannot base our decision on what
happens to it when it's placed under an http:// url.
Things like fproxy are ultimately temporary measures.
Excuse me, but why is this discussion so tedious? It's a small change, and
one that
- Original Message -
From: David McNab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs // breaks lots of software
The problem could be solved **SO** simply.
Let's assign two meanings to the single slash.
1) After 'SSK
