TECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: anonymity(NOT)
Importance: Low
Matthew Findley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you honestly belive that you could convince a jury that the gover
Matthew Findley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you honestly belive that you could convince a jury that the government put
> KP on freenet just to entrap you thats pretty sad.
> See in the courts you need a little thing called evidence. Good luck finding
> some that shows the government is
to find out anything about me that I didn't want
you to know.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Findley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [fr
On 8 Aug 2004, at 01:49, Matthew Findley wrote:
Ok, I'll admit I was partly wrong.
"Partly"! That's quite an admission for someone who claimed they would
be anonymous yet who I was able to tell them the tiny little town they
lived in with about 20 seconds of research based on the information
co
arke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Findley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: anonymity(NOT)
Really? Then I guess your ISP must be based in or close to Riverview,
Florida, whi
TPSVC(5.0.2195.6824);
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:02:10 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [24.72.74.85] by web41307.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri,
06 Aug 2004 22:02:10 PDT
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: pineapple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat]
with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:02:10 -0700Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Received:
from [24.72.74.85] by web41307.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2004
22:02:10 PDTDate: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:02:10 -0700 (PDT)From: pineapple
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject:
Re:
On 6 Aug 2004, at 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WWW is very anonymous. If I hadn't used my real name in my email
address there is no way you could tell who I am.
Thw WWW is anonymous if you are worried about being tracked down by a
computer illiterate 10 year old. If you are worried about
Seriously. If you
> don't
> > undertand that then you are either ignorant or a
> > troll. I'm beginning to think it's the latter.
> >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
ly. If you don't> undertand that then you are either
ignorant or a> troll. I'm beginning to think it's the
latter.> > > > > -Original Message->
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you are either ignorant or a
troll. I'm beginning to think it's the latter.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 7:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
Actually I do trust the government to leave my messages alone... I'm not doing
anything terribly interesting.
And even if they are conducting massive surveillance, there's not much they can do
about when they catch something juicy because of the 4th amendment to the constitution
protects your pr
Am Freitag, 6. August 2004 16:36 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Whether or not you truly believe there is no illegal material on
> freenet is a question for the jury. Given the fact that there are
> numerous warnings about it, a huge number of frost boards are dedicate
> to KP, and all the main searc
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 7:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-chat] RE: anonymity(NOT)
Importance: Low
I have doubts that illegal material is posted on
Freenet. After all, I haven't seen any illegal
material, I've
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:37:12PM -0700, pineapple wrote:
> Let me say that I only use
> Freenet to communicate, anonymously, legal information
> and because there are no better alternatives. Unless
> your position is the government has the right to
> monitor ALL communication. I don't find that
I have doubts that illegal material is posted on
Freenet. After all, I haven't seen any illegal
material, I've only heard rumors about it. However,
if there is illegal material on Freenet it's my belief
that this material is posted by
governments/organizations hostile to the goals of
Freenet and
16 matches
Mail list logo
