Thanks to all for the information regarding the El Camino rear suspension
braces. I now know why mine didn't have them, but will probably add them.
Thanks again,
Gene
> Gene,
> The F40 and F41 suspension package had a frame brace that went from
> the front bolt of the lower control arm to the
Don't know about 71's but for 70, the F41 was only availble on 13637-67
models while the F40 was availble on anything but a wagon. Sounds like
Larry may have a valid point, exclamations and all.
Dale McIntosh
TC Gold #92/ACES #1709
67SS/67 Elky
> Subject: RE: [Chevelle-List] Ques
I bought a 70 EC SS out of a junkyard. It had those braces from the factory. The Chevelles equppied with the F-41 suspension had the braces along with the boxed arms.
Tom
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Question about El Camino Rear Suspension
I thought all El Caminos had those. I know they are part of the F-41 Suspension on
big block cars. I custom made a beefier set for my 70. The
I thought all El Caminos had those. I know they are part of the F-41 Suspension on
big block cars. I custom made a beefier set for my 70. They add stability to the
suspension. I personnaly would put them on for a performance application.
Tom
-
Gene,
The F40 and F41 suspension package had a frame brace that went from
the front bolt of the lower control arm to the front bolt of the upper
in front of the rear crossmember. I have driven chevelles with and
without them and have noticed no difference but I'm not real rough with
them in the
I have a 71 Elky that I want to add boxed control arms and a rear sway bar to
improve handling. My questions are around the tubular brace (Edelbrock in this
case) that runs from the lower to the upper control arms for support. Some of
the materials that I have read talk about replacing a curre
7 matches
Mail list logo
