On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:09:54PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Is that right? Personally, I'd rather make (declare (hide ...)) simply
> do the right thing -- the right thing being the behaviour you originally
> expected when filing #1376 -- than add a new type of declaration or
> module syntax.
>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:53:32PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hey Peter,
>
> On 2017-06-04 13:53, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Regarding time specifically, there are not many stand-alone programs
> > that will use this macro, I think. It's more a thing for benchmarks
> > and such, so I'm not even sure i
Evan Hanson writes:
> If I understand correctly, this would effectively be an "unexport" of
> sorts, like so:
Yes, that's what I was thinking.
>
> Is that right? Personally, I'd rather make (declare (hide ...)) simply
> do the right thing -- the right thing being the behaviour you originally
>
Both changes signed off and pushed. :)
Sorry for the delay.
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Hey all,
On 2017-06-05 11:43, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:09:54PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > Is that right? Personally, I'd rather make (declare (hide ...)) simply
> > do the right thing -- the right thing being the behaviour you originally
> > expected when filing #1376 -- th
On 2017-06-05 12:11, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:53:32PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > On 2017-06-04 13:53, Peter Bex wrote:
> > > Regarding time specifically, there are not many stand-alone programs
> > > that will use this macro, I think. It's more a thing for benchmarks
> > >
Evan Hanson writes:
>> Which foo should be hidden? Both, or none?
>
> Personally, I'd expect the following behaviour, depending on where the
> declaration appears:
>
I did some tests with and without the POC patch I sent yesterday.
Some observations:
(these are the only variables with differi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:11:06PM +0200, Kooda wrote:
> Both changes signed off and pushed. :)
>
> Sorry for the delay.
No worries, and many thanks for taking a look!
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Chicken-hackers mai
