On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 11:34:30AM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> As of afd7867, we can make these values available to the other files
> that need to use them without making them part of the chicken.export
> module's public API by assigning directly to namespaced identifiers.
Excellent. This complet
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
I can imagine those macros going into (chicken base) and/or some
> other modules, but a (chicken syntax) module with them in it makes
> sense too. Then we could just rename (chicken syntax) on the
> c-l-r page to (chicken expand) and keep expand
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:39:13PM +0200, lemonboy wrote:
> Hello hackers,
> the first two patches are meant to be applied after you review them, they are
> pretty much the same I've previously sent but with some minor corrections so
> those should be fine now.
Thanks for the patches. Attached ar
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> I can imagine those macros going into (chicken base) and/or some
> > other modules, but a (chicken syntax) module with them in it makes
> > sense too. Then we could just rename (chic
> This brings up the obvious question: what should we do with
> (chicken expand)? I was considering a patch to rename it to
> (chicken syntax) like we have in c-l-r, but should we then also
> rename the expand.scm file to syntax.scm? I think this would
> be the most sensible thing to do.
>
> But
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> > I can imagine those macros going into (chicken base) and/or some
> > > other modules, but a (chicken syntax) module with them in it makes
> > > sense too. Then we could just re
> As Kooda found out when working on #1379, there's still some problems
> with the symbol GC stuff in CHICKEN 5. Sometimes you'll see an assertion
> failure in update_symbol_tables: assert(!C_persistable_symbol(sym)) will
> bail out due to some symbols being released while they still had a global
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 07:21:30PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > I'd also like to hear what the other core members think.
>
> (chicken syntax), and keep expand.scm. Don't overdo it.
Do you mean we rename (chicken expand) to (chicken syntax) in
expand.scm (with perhaps the other ma
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 07:21:30PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > I'd also like to hear what the other core members think.
> >
> > (chicken syntax), and keep expand.scm. Don't overdo it.
>
> Do you mean we rename (chicken expand) to (chicken syntax) in
> expand.scm (with perhap
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 07:57:25PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> You know what? I don't know. I just realize that too many things are
> changing too much, at too fast a rate. So much that I'm now totally
> confused, which is an indication that perhaps this might be getting
> out of ha
10 matches
Mail list logo
