On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 1:43 PM, lemonboy wrote:
AFAICT the `extras` module contains a bunch of useful procedures to get one
> started writing so it'd be nice if we could choose and implement a single
> PRNG,
> taking advantage of the (light) breakage introduced by C5.
>
Is there anything wrong
You could use random-bsd as a drop-in replacement if you want.
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/random-bsd
> On Sep 17, 2017, at 12:43 PM, lemonboy wrote:
>
> Hello hackers,
> this time there's no patch and no code involved. I recently had some code that
> used the `random`/`randomize` duo from the `
Hello hackers,
this time there's no patch and no code involved. I recently had some code that
used the `random`/`randomize` duo from the `extras` module to do some operations
on some data. The code came with a modest test suite that worked just fine on my
laptop but failed when run on other systems
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 05:43:07PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've applied this to both branches. Thanks for the explanation, it was
> helpful in trying to figure out what will happen when the trace buffer
> is filled more quickly than signals arrive. I also had to convince
> myself
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:44:09AM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > It should be possible to link with units, but I guess that can be done
> > > via "declare".
> > > If that is still possible then "require-library" may indeed go.
> >
> > Yeah, I think that's still possible.
>
> Wha
> > It has uses - "notice" is different, and can be replaced by a (trivially)
> > implemented user-made logging facility. This may sound a bit like
> > bikeshedding,
> > but we will break a bit of code otherwise.
>
> Note that the second patch I supplied doesn't remove "notice" or "warning",
> it
