On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:04:48AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2018-01-28 13:55, Peter Bex wrote:
> > One suggestion: Given that input-port-open? and output-port-open? are
> > in chicken.base, I would find it more intuitive to have port-closed? in
> > chicken.base as well. What do you think?
>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 08:55:42AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2018-01-28 13:30, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Sounds okay to me. One question, though: shouldn't chicken.base#sleep-hook
> > be defined as a fully-qualified symbol? It isn't exported.
>
> Good catch! Here's an updated patch.
Thanks, pus
