On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 09:01:18AM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> Here's a fix for #1513. This does the simple thing and just avoids
> including module namespaces in `struct' type tags.
Thanks for making this patch! Pushed.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:32:52PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2018-08-24 9:27, Peter Bex wrote:
> > I'd prefer to add the current module to struct type declarations, instead.
> > This should be equally simple; I think we can add this to validate-type's
> > handling of struct: if the struct is
On 2018-08-24 9:27, Peter Bex wrote:
> I'd prefer to add the current module to struct type declarations, instead.
> This should be equally simple; I think we can add this to validate-type's
> handling of struct: if the struct is not qualified, add the current
> module (if any).
That approach has
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 09:01:18AM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> Here's a fix for #1513. This does the simple thing and just avoids
> including module namespaces in `struct' type tags.
>
> After 5.0 we can revisit this behaviour and maybe make the compiler a
> bit smarter
Hello hackers,
Here's a fix for #1513. This does the simple thing and just avoids
including module namespaces in `struct' type tags.
After 5.0 we can revisit this behaviour and maybe make the compiler a
bit smarter regarding types inside modules, but for right now let's keep
the changes small.
