Hi!
> We don't use Sun's implementation of Java, because it's not
> ideologically pure ;-) Plus everyone knows that good programming
> languages have a specification that doesn't shift like quicksand...
Well, that is partially not true anymore. Sun already released two important
components of
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:46:25PM -0800, Paulo Jabardo wrote:
> I think that a simple solution, that would not solve this particular problem
> but might help in the future is to have an egg repository for each version.
> So if someone is using an older version of chicken, the chicken-setup
On 12/8/06, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:46:25PM -0800, Paulo Jabardo wrote:
> I think that a simple solution, that would not solve this particular problem
but might help in the future is to have an egg repository for each version. So if
someone is usi
I was going to say, it would take some effort to backport the
current egg repository to a given older version of Chicken. But I
appreciate the new addition to chicken-setup; and at least I can
create a Chicken 2.3 egg repository for the eggs I use.
-Ivan
"felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROT
That's true, and I am sure the GPLed Sun JDK will eventually find
its way into the main Debian distribution. Though I am quite fond of
gcj and the free implementations of the Java libraries, even if they
don't include everything.
-Ivan
Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>
On 12/8/06, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was going to say, it would take some effort to backport the
current egg repository to a given older version of Chicken. But I
appreciate the new addition to chicken-setup; and at least I can
create a Chicken 2.3 egg repository for the eggs I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
In the current version 'apropos' & 'apropos-list' are defined in the
utils unit. (Yes, and in the wiki manual.)
The environments egg is updated w/ an new query procedure & extended
support for the interaction-environment.
Best Wishe
Well, it's certainly not going to hurt anybody, and it might be
somewhat useful for future "forking" of the egg repository. Though of
course some eggs might later have bug fixes that don't necessarily
break compatibility with older versions... whatever happened to the
idea of having unit tests
On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:29 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 12/8/06, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was going to say, it would take some effort to backport the
current egg repository to a given older version of Chicken. But I
appreciate the new addition to chicken-setup; and at least I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:38 AM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Well, it's certainly not going to hurt anybody, and it might be
somewhat useful for future "forking" of the egg repository. Though of
course some eggs might later have bug fixes that don't necessari
It turned out that it is quite painless to make Debian packages for
Chicken 2.41 based on the 2.3 build scripts. If anyone is interested,
I have built Chicken packages for Debian stable and placed them at the
following repository:
deb http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/mrci/debian stable main
deb
That's what I meant with my previous post. Until the API is stable enough, this
should be a decent solution. There remains only the back porting of new eggs.
But if someone needs that specific version so bad, they could probably get
somehelp back porting the egg.
- Mensagem original
D
On Friday 08 December 2006 16:38, Ivan Raikov wrote:
> It turned out that it is quite painless to make Debian packages for
> Chicken 2.41 based on the 2.3 build scripts. If anyone is interested,
> I have built Chicken packages for Debian stable and placed them at the
> following repository:
>
>
Ivan Raikov wrote:
It turned out that it is quite painless to make Debian packages for
Chicken 2.41 based on the 2.3 build scripts. If anyone is interested,
I have built Chicken packages for Debian stable and placed them at the
following repository:
deb http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/mrci/debia
The tarball for Chicken 2.5 doesn't have chicken.texi, and I didn't
want to just use the texinfo file from 2.4. I was referring to the
Debian package build scripts that were used to build the Chicken 2.3
packages for Debian. I have attached a tarball with those
scripts. Just untar it in the dire
15 matches
Mail list logo
