Kon Lovett wrote:
> [...]
> There is POSIX support via the CRT library. A compatibility attempt.
> [...]
Hello Kon,
as far as I know, the only thing similar to POSIX in the Win32 CRT
library is file descriptor emulation. And that's almost entirely useless
because it supports none of the more adv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:17:57AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
>
>> sxml-tools uses the rather questionable idiom of "(apply append"
>> and "(apply string-append" at various places, which (I believe) is
>> repsonsible for the argument limit error.
>>
>
On 11 May 2007 16:18:15 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
Shouldn't (file-exists? ".\\") return the path to the current
directory?
So, would a simple removal of a trailing backslash be sufficient for
the moment?
cheers,
felix
_
On 5/15/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> We've had a feature complete, field tested, all but bug free CMake
> build for awhile now. It took 1 man year to produce. It is the only
> way to produce the MSVC versions of Chicken, and it is preferred for
> Min
felix winkelmann scripsit:
> So, would a simple removal of a trailing backslash be sufficient for
> the moment?
At least remove trailing slashes too. There is really no reason
for Chicken application programmers to jump through hoops to use
slashes on Unix and backslashes on Windows, as slashes
On May 16, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
But I would consider the Mach interfaces internal API and
only the BSD, Carbon and Cocoa interfaces public API, because it would
be pretty tedious to write anything useful using only the Mach
interfaces and because otherwise I also woul
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> Having the 2nd invocation of "make install" repeat the build from
> scratch is not that important a bug, and all evidence says it's a
> Linux specific bug.
I'd like to see if it happens on a Solaris or BSD system. I've been
wondering if it might not be a general bug
On 5/16/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> Having the 2nd invocation of "make install" repeat the build from
> scratch is not that important a bug, and all evidence says it's a
> Linux specific bug.
I'd like to see if it happens on a Solaris or BSD system.
On 5/16/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/16/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brandon Van Every scripsit:
>
> > Having the 2nd invocation of "make install" repeat the build from
> > scratch is not that important a bug, and all evidence says it's a
> > Linux spe
On Wed, 16 May 2007 16:16:33 -0700 "Brandon Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/16/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> > >
> > > > Having the 2nd invocation of "make install"
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> Using Darcs head, I cannot reproduce the bug on Fedora Core 6, even
> when overwriting an installed Chicken. "make install" does what it's
> supposed to do, no matter how many times invoked. So, now I need you
> Linux guys to see if the bug still exists in Darcs hea
Hi all,
is it safe to call (from Chicken) a C function that spawns off a pthread
before returning? Are there any restrictions on what that thread can do,
e.g. w.r.t. malloc() ?
Cheers,
Dan
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
ht
12 matches
Mail list logo
