Re: [Chicken-users] Request for comments on the SQLite3 egg API

2007-07-10 Thread felix winkelmann
On 7/10/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thomas Christian Chust scripsit: > I have now changed the sqlite3 egg to represent NULL values as (void) on > the CHICKEN side. I have also made the necessary changes to the > sqlite3-tinyclos object relation mapper egg. Excellent! It would be

[Chicken-users] Re: Lua

2007-07-10 Thread John Cowan
John Cowan scripsit: > Excellent! Can you put it in the repository? Also, I think you should > consider using the unspecified object as Lua nil; conceptually they > are pretty much the same. That frees up symbols (as well as strings) > to be translated to Lua strings, since Lua strings serve so

[Chicken-users] Re: Lua

2007-07-10 Thread John Cowan
felix winkelmann scripsit: > On 7/7/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >felix winkelmann scripsit: > > > >> I have most of it working, where you thinking of something > >> particular? Or is evaluating Lua code enough? > > > >I'd like to see. Why not publish it as an 0.1 egg? > > > > Have

Re: [Chicken-users] List -> C strings

2007-07-10 Thread Robin Lee Powell
For the record, because I've found people asking this before, here's what I did: #> char **make_strings(C_word lst) { int len, i; C_word tmp; char **hlist; len = C_unfix(C_i_length(lst)); hlist = (char**) malloc(sizeof(char*) * (len + 1)); for(i = 0, tmp = lst; i < len; i++, tm

[Chicken-users] OpenID

2007-07-10 Thread john
Hi Has anyone played around with OpenID authorisation using spiffy? Cheers, John. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] FLTK and CEGUI

2007-07-10 Thread Alex Queiroz
Hallo, On 7/10/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I realize that not everyone's a game developer or cares about such capabilities. But I thought I would mention it since it's something I might be interested in. It deserves consideration for those who think an OpenGL based GUI is

Re: [Chicken-users] Request for comments on the SQLite3 egg API

2007-07-10 Thread Graham Fawcett
On 7/10/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Excellent! It would be good if the authors of the other database eggs (Toby Butzon for mysql, Johannes Groedem for postgresql, Felix for sqlite, and Graham Fawcett for sqlora) would now make the same change. Last time I sent a patch to Johannes

Re: [Chicken-users] Request for comments on the SQLite3 egg API

2007-07-10 Thread John Cowan
Thomas Christian Chust scripsit: > I have now changed the sqlite3 egg to represent NULL values as (void) on > the CHICKEN side. I have also made the necessary changes to the > sqlite3-tinyclos object relation mapper egg. Excellent! It would be good if the authors of the other database eggs (Toby

Re: [Chicken-users] Request for comments on the SQLite3 egg API

2007-07-10 Thread Thomas Christian Chust
Hello, I have now changed the sqlite3 egg to represent NULL values as (void) on the CHICKEN side. I have also made the necessary changes to the sqlite3-tinyclos object relation mapper egg. *** ***

[Chicken-users] FLTK and CEGUI

2007-07-10 Thread Brandon Van Every
On 7/8/07, Adhi Hargo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well then, either we focus on wxWidgets, or FLTK (!). I don't mind the latter, IMHO its interface is quite clean and simple, a total opposite to wxWidgets albeit somewhat limiting usage. Never encounter a buggy FLTK app either (lack of exposure?).

Re: [Chicken-users] passing a string to foreign-lambda*

2007-07-10 Thread Graham Fawcett
On 7/10/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/10/07, Martin DeMello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks! I was trying to use string-concatenate, but couldn't manage to > make it available at macro expansion time (is this possible?) (require-for-syntax 'sfi-13) D'oh, I forgot ab

[Chicken-users] Re: Lua

2007-07-10 Thread felix winkelmann
On 7/7/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: felix winkelmann scripsit: > I have most of it working, where you thinking of something > particular? Or is evaluating Lua code enough? I'd like to see. Why not publish it as an 0.1 egg? Have a look at http://chicken.wiki.br/lua cheers, fel