Hi all,
I have noticed that the find-files procedure ignores all
subdirectories it finds in the target directory, and I wondered why
that is, since it is inconsistent with the Unix find command. So is
this a bug or a feature? Also, would it be possible to add an option
to include dot files, si
On 11/2/07, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The full sentence should be:
> > (set-describer! `point (lambda (pt o)(print "a point with x=" (point-x
> > pt) " y=" (point-y pt
> >
>
>
> BTW, what is "o" after "pt" in "(lambda (pt o)" ?
> I know what pt is for, but what is "o"?
It is
Hi, Rick!
If you get something like "out of memory - heap full", then this is most
likely a FFI-related problem. It happens sometimes that Scheme data
objects get corrupted by foreign or lowlevel code and a field that contains
the size of an allocated object ends up containing a pointer. On the
n
> On Nov 4, 2007 12:02 AM, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm writing a number of test cases using the test egg. I would like to use
> > the test program for automated testing. Is it possible to know that one of
> > the tests failed, so I can exit the program with an error value?
hi
I was cleaning up Grobner Basis library and testing with several
implementations,
the code runs fine with petite mzscheme and gambit-c:
You can download the code here:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/math-linux/grobner-basis.scm
a session with gambit-c:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /build/scheme /usr/
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 09:00:02 -0800 Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe. Sometimes egg maintainers forget a dependency. But this will
> be clear at runtime.
>
> Usually you can ignore such messages.
Install-time errors are usually caught by the daily salmonella runs
(http://chicken.wiki.
Hello,
If you run chicken-setup without arguments in the directory where
your egg resides, your .setup file will be executed, so in this way
you can at least make sure your egg is compiled and installed
properly. Or did you have some other kind of testing in mind? When you
actually have an egg
i wrote a function to prepend unit axes onto an array. this is
oftentimes necessary to get arrays to the same rank before applying
some sort of operation to them.
if there is a better way to do this, I'm all ears. Please, no comments
about my parenthesizing style :)
(define prepend-unit-axes
(l
hi
I'm reading the eggs tutorial, is there a place for uploading test
eggs to test the entire procedure,
I don't want to clutter the trunk with useless test eggs.
Or is there a way to test locally.
Thanks
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@n
On 11/4/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2007 1:40 PM, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > I'm trying to read the foreign code document, what is "[syntax]" that
> > appears everywhere?
> > [syntax] (foreign-code STRING ...)
>
>
>
> Using this case as a
On Nov 3, 2007 1:40 PM, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> I'm trying to read the foreign code document, what is "[syntax]" that
> appears everywhere?
> [syntax] (foreign-code STRING ...)
Using this case as an example, there is no procedure called "foreign-code".
Rather there is
On Nov 4, 2007, at 8:32 AM, naruto canada wrote:
hi
does chicken-setup support auto dependency resolution like perl -
MCPAN?
when I did:
yes "yes" | chicken-setup meta-setup
"yes" not needed - use 'chicken-setup -d ...'
I saw a lot of warnings about something not installed, or "used bu
hi ive got a weird bug that i cant figure out. when i boot chicken i
trigger a crash depending on whether or not i eval any sexpr before i
eval the sexpr i want. my sexpr involves a macro definition called
'go' whose source code is csc'ed and linked into the host C app. when
we start chicke
hi
does chicken-setup support auto dependency resolution like perl -MCPAN?
when I did:
yes "yes" | chicken-setup meta-setup
I saw a lot of warnings about something not installed, or "used but
not imported", etc.
Should I worry about those?
___
Chicke
Hi, I wanted to update my cross compiled Chicken from 2.6 to 2.7 but ran
into problems. I attempted a build with PLATFORM=linux but it borks at:
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DHAVE_CHICKEN_CONFIG_H -c apply-hack.x86.s -o
apply-hack.x86.o
I am not sure what apply-hack does or what is needed for an
After I develop a function, I want to see what happens to the input
data as it hits each step of the function to make sure it is working
correctly. For example, in the following function:
(define (mraze a)
(let* ([unboxed-a (unbox-array a)]
[unboxed-l (array->list unboxed-a)]
[
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:56:52AM -0500, William Ramsay wrote:
> All,
>
> Is there such a thing as a Chicken/Scheme style guide?Not a book or
> tutorial on Scheme syntax.I've been writing code for years and have
> used every language from Cobol to Ruby.I think my style is an
> amalgam
All,
Is there such a thing as a Chicken/Scheme style guide?Not a book or
tutorial on Scheme syntax.I've been writing code for years and have
used every language from Cobol to Ruby.I think my style is an
amalgam of all the languages I've ever used. Is there a Scheme Way?
I've read
Hi,
On Nov 4, 2007 12:02 AM, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm writing a number of test cases using the test egg. I would like to use
> the test program for automated testing. Is it possible to know that one of
> the tests failed, so I can exit the program with an error value?
I was
19 matches
Mail list logo
