Previously to Scheme I was playing with Ruby. One feature of Scheme
that got me hooked was s-expressions. I still struggle to explain
s-expressions verbally. There are continual debates about
s-expressions vs XML vs xyz on the interweb. It would be cool to
include an introduction to s-expressions
Hi folks,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:06:27 -0600 Mark Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/cgi-bin/svnwiki/default/chicken-for-ruby-programmers
Just a sidenote: this URL can be shortened to
http://chicken.wiki.br/chicken-for-ruby-programmers
Keep the good work!
Best
Hi all,
Are any Chicken Schemers thinking about attending the Continuation
Fest in Tokyo that was just announced on comp.lang.scheme? I will
probably be in the area that entire weekend, if anyone wants to have a
Chicken meetup.
-Ivan
___
Ivan == Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IvanAre any Chicken Schemers thinking about attending the
Ivan Continuation Fest in Tokyo that was just announced on
Ivan comp.lang.scheme? I will probably be in the area that entire
Ivan weekend, if anyone wants to have a Chicken
John Cowan wrote:
All builds on Windows (cygwin, mingw, mingw/msys) have the same issue:
Windows doesn't have a separate search path for DLLs, so all DLLs have
to be on $PATH. However, the working directory is *always* on $PATH
whether explicitly so or not.
Actually, the problem turned out
On Feb 20, 2008 3:56 PM, Ashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to do some more work on it today. Right now uninstall doesn't
work and it
doesn't clean up properly in the main build or when using
chicken-setup. Assuming
people are interested, I'll post a patch later today.
I'm
Ashley scripsit:
Actually, the problem turned out to be my misunderstanding of the
intent of the mingw-msys makefile. I assumed it was similar to
the cygwin build, but I realize now that doesn't make much sense
as mingw uses the microsoft runtime. So things like chicken-setup,
which
John Cowan wrote:
Ashley scripsit:
Actually, the problem turned out to be my misunderstanding of the
intent of the mingw-msys makefile. I assumed it was similar to
the cygwin build, but I realize now that doesn't make much sense
as mingw uses the microsoft runtime. So things like
Just playing around with some ideas I had for a Chicken website, figured I might
as well post them up and let everyone see what I wasted a couple of hours on
tonight :-)
Be warned, the javascript crashed Firefox here on OS X a few times. I built it
in Safari, works fine there.
This is more of a general Scheme question...
Let's say I have the following definitions:
#;1 (define magic 42)
#;2 (define s '(foo bar ,magic))
Now I want to replace ,magic with its value. If I write this directly with
backquote and unquote, it's easy and straightforward:
#;3 `(foo bar
On 2/19/08, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright. I suppose I'll highlight the procedure name and make sure it
gets typeset in monospaced font, as:
[procedure] {{('''proc''' a b)}}
I would like it if that line were wrapped in a div e.g.
div class=definition.../div so that
On 2/19/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
signature type=stringdoctype:xhtml-1.0-strict/signature
Thinking about this a little more, it strikes me that
definition or def is probably a better tag than signature.
So:
def type=stringdoctype:xhtml-1.0-strict/def
for unusual definitions we
Hans Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
#;1 (define magic 42) #;2 (define s '(foo bar ,magic))
[...]
The following doesn't work:
#;4 `s s #;5 `,s (foo bar (unquote magic))
...and I understand *why* they don't work, but I can't figure
out how to take s and transform
On 2/19/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
signature type=stringdoctype:xhtml-1.0-strict/signature
Thinking about this a little more, it strikes me that
definition or def is probably a better tag than signature.
So:
def type=stringdoctype:xhtml-1.0-strict/def
for unusual
On 2/19/08, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright. I suppose I'll highlight the procedure name and make sure it
gets typeset in monospaced font, as:
[procedure] {{('''proc''' a b)}}
I would like it if that line were wrapped in a div e.g.
div class=definition.../div
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Ozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just playing around with some ideas I had for a Chicken website, figured I
might
as well post them up and let everyone see what I wasted a couple of hours on
tonight :-)
Hey, the animated highlighting is nice!
cheers,
felix
16 matches
Mail list logo
