Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
I just wrote a Vim syntax file for svnwiki, mainly to learn how to
write a Vim syntax file :-) and to help editing Wiki pages too.
Thank you, Tobia, I can't wait to begin using it! :-)
Care to send it to the Vim-people (I don't know if these days you're
suppose
I've also been working on the main Scheme syntax file, but that's a
major mess.
I still haven't been able to highlight #;(...) properly, among other
things.
The stupid vimscript language is not helping either...
Tobia
___
Chicken-users mailing l
Is there a way to tell what are the current versions available for the
eggs?
I notice that http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/ now
acts as a redirect to the wiki, but I also notice that on the wiki the
version numbers for the eggs seem to be absent.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unido
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to tell what are the current versions available for the
> eggs?
>
> I notice that http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/ now
> acts as a redirect to the wiki, but I also notice that
> Not all eggs have externally visible version information (only the
> "tagged" eggs), so this is currently not available. You can fetch
> the repository file to get at least timestamps:
Surely you are kidding here?
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
_
Hi all
I faced some trouble when installing bb egg in mingw-msys. There is no
issues in Linux. But I like to be cross-platform in FLTK. Here I'm going
to place some corrections to csc and bb.setup (a bit later :) )
___
Chicken-users mailing list
C
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:58:33AM -0800, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
> Is there a way to tell what are the current versions available for the
> eggs?
>
> I notice that http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/ now
> acts as a redirect to the wiki, but I also notice that on the wiki t
> > Not all eggs have externally visible version information (only the
> > "tagged" eggs), so this is currently not available. You can fetch
> > the repository file to get at least timestamps:
>
> Surely you are kidding here?
By which I mean...
Didn't we have a nice working system in which all e
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not all eggs have externally visible version information (only the
> > "tagged" eggs), so this is currently not available. You can fetch
> > the repository file to get at least timestamps:
>
> Surely you are
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By which I mean...
>
> Didn't we have a nice working system in which all eggs had version
> numbers? Wasn't it always possible to get version numbers from the
> eggs in the HTML page at call/cc.org/eggs?
>
> The version is given by the tag from which it is build, or, in the
> case of untagged eggs, the version given in the .setup script. Once
> installed, you can list the versions with "chicken-setup -l". It
> was always like this. Nothing has changed.
Wasn't it possible to tell the versions of al
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The version is given by the tag from which it is build, or, in the
> > case of untagged eggs, the version given in the .setup script. Once
> > installed, you can list the versions with "chicken-setup -l". It
> No. Look, I didn't change anything. It has grown that way and
> I know it's fscking broken.
Ahh, alright, I guess I was wrong. I thought it used to show the
version numbers. Sorry.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
___
Chicken-users mailing li
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. Look, I didn't change anything. It has grown that way and
> > I know it's fscking broken.
>
> Ahh, alright, I guess I was wrong. I thought it used to show the
> version numbers. Sorry.
>
No problem. It
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:29 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No. Look, I didn't change anything. It has grown that way and
> > > I know it's fscking broken.
> >
> > Ahh, alright, I
> For tagged eggs, the version number is the name of the most
> recently-added tag (correct)?
No. The version number is the greatest string sorting them as a human
would compare version numbers (eg. 1.12 is greater than 1.9.2, and the
date in which they were added is not relevant). There is an
e
> Now that I think about it, perhaps this can be optimized using the
> orders egg! ;-)
By "optimized" for I meant "optimized for more readability", of
course. :-)
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongn
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For tagged eggs, the version number is the name of the most
> > recently-added tag (correct)?
>
> No. The version number is the greatest string sorting them as a human
> would compare version numbers... [sn
> Just to be clear, is that "thanks, yes please set up the CGI" or
> "thanks, I've just realized how do it myself"? :-)
Heh, I knew I could get those numbers from the svn repos from the
beginning, silly.
I think the best thing would be extending the post-commit to encode
the version name in the p
Hi there,
While converting some more documentation to the wiki, I noticed something
weird:
* There's both a tk and a PS-tk egg. Neither of these is marked deprecated.
* PS-tk seems to be a derivative of tk
* PS-tk has a BSD license, tk has some "Bremer License" I never heard of
Are these really
(define-macro (my-lock . body)
`(let ([result #f])
(if (eq? (mutex-state my-mutex) (current-thread))
Well, the value returned by mutex-state can be either:
locked by this thread
In this case there can be no race condition, as we own
the mutex and nothing is going to take it
trying to compile a csc genereated file on linux that was generated on
leopard gives this error, does someone have a clue about what this
might be due to?
best, rick
I would like to test it but I still can't build it from svn, tough.
I change the path to include csound.h in Csound.h. But
../../src/ChickenBridge.cpp:281: error: expected initializer before
'C_aligned'
../../src/ChickenBridge.cpp:282: error: expected initializer before
'C_aligned'
[...]
sorry i hit send before i pasted this in. this is line 281 and 282 in
the file
static C_char C_TLS li0[] C_aligned={C_li
On 2008 Feb 26, at 16:04, Tobia Conforto wrote:
Well, the value returned by mutex-state can be either:
locked by this thread
In this case there can be no race condition, as we own
the mutex and nothing is going to take it away from us.
locked by another thread
abandoned
not-ab
On 26/02/2008, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh, I knew I could get those numbers from the svn repos from the
> beginning, silly.
>
> I think the best thing would be extending the post-commit to encode
> the version name in the page in the wiki. I will address this in my
Hi folks,
I've just checked in a patch to the trunk of the release/3/postgresql
egg, providing support for query parameters. If anyone else is using
this egg, I'd appreciate your checking out this version and testing
it.
In all of the querying procedures, the new interface lets you replace
the qu
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Graham Fawcett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just checked in a patch to the trunk of the release/3/postgresql
> egg, providing support for query parameters. If anyone else is using
> this egg, I'd appreciate your checking out this version and te
Howdy y'all,
I'm having a bit of trouble getting SSP to work. Most likely I am doing
something wrong, I just don't know what exactly. :-)
I have a file web/blah.ssp with this code from the Spiffy documentation:
~S~%" i)) (iota 5))?>
(name . _) name))?>
Then I do the following in csi:
#
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 07:47:27 pm Graham Fawcett wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just checked in a patch to the trunk of the release/3/postgresql
> egg, providing support for query parameters. If anyone else is using
> this egg, I'd appreciate your checking out this version and testing
> it.
I w
29 matches
Mail list logo
