On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
>
> You have my full support! And I'll rewrite my hygienic misc-macros to
> work with ER, just to fit into the new world order ;-)
I, for one, welcome our new hygienic overlords.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The pro
On 14 May 2008, at 3:52 pm, felix winkelmann wrote:
This hygienic chicken represents in my humble opinion the direction
into
which chicken should go. It breaks with backward compatibility in
quite
a number of points and will require major effort to port all eggs
to (some
eggs will have to be d
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just tested on NetBSD and it didn't build at first. It gave me
> this error:
>
> gcc -shared \
> -shared chicken.import.o -o chicken.import.so \
> -lchicken -lm
> ld: cannot find -lchicken
> gmake[1]:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... I lament the loss of match, as I've become enamoured of
> explicit-renaming macros with pattern matching. Will this still be
> doable with matchable?
Yes.
cheers,
felix
__
