Here it is:
make -f Makefile.linux32 all
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/daishi/src/chicken-3.2.0'
gcc -m32 -shared \
-o libchicken.so library.o eval.o data-structures.o extras.o lolevel.o
utils.o tcp.o srfi-1.o srfi-4.o srfi-13.o srfi-14.o srfi-18.o srfi-69.o
posixunix.o regex.o scheduler
Actually, I think it would be nice to have a tool that can
automatically create a custom Chicken shared library that only
includes the units that user specifies, and perhaps that can also
statically link eggs to that library. For example, if I want to deploy
a standalone application that does no
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:03:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have been meaning to port the Haskell FilePath library to
Chicken, because I find its API to be quite el
Hi Felix.
Excellent move! I can confirm that inlining is often the key
to widen performance bottle necks. And if I understand your
modification correctly, it might even allow to inline functions
from the chicken "core" if one generates suitable inline files.
But let's start by collecting some expe
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Shawn Rutledge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Or anything that has a global identity, beyond built-in. Need some kind of
>> '(remain )' to designate existing "root" objects, i.e. objects that
>> will exist when the de-serialization occurs. How to handle the "root"
I forgot to add that "-debug i" will show a lot of useful output, in
case you want to experiment.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Hi!
I have added some inlining improvements to the trunk that
might be of interest: together with a bit of compiler cleanup,
inlining has been made more aggressive (a higher default setting
for "inline-limit") and a new compilation mode ("local") has been
added. "local" is what gambit calls "bloc
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody tried compiling 32bit chicken on x86_64?
> I made a special Makefile, but giving me an error.
> I'm totally not sure if this is the right way or not.
> Thanks for any comments.
Can you give us the error m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 Oct 2008, at 2:06 pm, Peter Bex wrote:
Many thanks again, Alaric, for providing the server space!
This is great! Thanks Alaric!
Since my Life Failure of the past year or so seems to have precluded
me doing any actual programming that does
Hi,
Has anybody tried compiling 32bit chicken on x86_64?
I made a special Makefile, but giving me an error.
I'm totally not sure if this is the right way or not.
Thanks for any comments.
Best,
Daishi
% diff Makefile.linux Makefile.linux32
30c30
< ARCH = $(shell sh config-arch.sh)
---
> ARCH = x
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:00:27PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thanks to Alaric and Mario, we have a mirror site for SVN access now:
>
> http://chicken.kitten-technologies.co.uk/
>
> The repository is updated hourly and allows read-only access, in
> case there are problems with g
Hello!
Thanks to Alaric and Mario, we have a mirror site for SVN access now:
http://chicken.kitten-technologies.co.uk/
The repository is updated hourly and allows read-only access, in
case there are problems with galinha (or it's connection to the
'net).
The "chicken-install" program has been
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I would keep these things in extensions, though. There is already too much
>> stuff in the core (I know I keep repeating this, but I'm really concerned
>> about
>> it).
>
> I think Ivan is not suggesting _adding_ this to
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:03:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been meaning to port the Haskell FilePath library to
> > Chicken, because I find its API to be quite elegant and better
> > or
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been meaning to port the Haskell FilePath library to
> Chicken, because I find its API to be quite elegant and better
> organized than the existing file name manipulation routines in
> Chicken. This dis
Hi all,
I have been meaning to port the Haskell FilePath library to
Chicken, because I find its API to be quite elegant and better
organized than the existing file name manipulation routines in
Chicken. This discussion has prompted me to create the filepath egg,
which is an almost verbatim tra
16 matches
Mail list logo