of
> the licensing -- that would make Chicken as a whole GPL, and that's not
> gonna happen. Making all that happen is what is harder than it seems.
>
Uhm, GMP is LGPL, so Chicken can use whatever license it likes, even if
it would start to use GMP.
Regards, Rotty
--
Andreas Rottma
malloc usage in
> Chicken Scheme?
>
Dunno specifically about Chicken Scheme (and "convinient" ;-), but given
the fact that your leak is in C code, you might be able to make sense
from Valgrind[0] output -- for C/C++ this works great, usually.
[0] http://valg
Peter Bex writes:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:42:16PM -0700, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
>> If you want real Scheme (rather than just lisp-like) you could try
>> Kawa. I have not tried either one, though.
>
> Actually, I think SISC is the canonical Scheme-on-Java. Not sure why,
> possibly because it
Hi!
I'm considering switching to ugarit (from a home-made C program driving
afio/tar/gpg) for my backup needs (a few Linux boxes), and would really
appreciate:
- GPG support (e.g. generate a random AES key/IV, and store it,
encrypted via GPG, in the archive). This would do away with the need
Peter Bex writes:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 08:00:55PM +, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
>> VOTE! :-)
>
> I don't find S3 all that exciting, while SFTP is very nifty to have.
>
> So I vote for SFTP.
>
+1
Cheers, Rotty
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chic
t;> you experienced this too?
>
> I wonder if you could give a small test program people could try in
> different environments?
>
Another idea: doing an strace(1) can maybe shed some light on this...
Regards, Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot;Nearly complete manual" [2].
[0] http://mumble.net/~campbell/darcs/s48-comfasl/
[1] http://community.schemewiki.org/?scheme48-module-system
[2] http://mumble.net/~campbell/s48-refman/html/Module-system.html#Module-system
Cheers, Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/25/07, Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Since Chicken lacks a built-in module system, I'm playing with the
>> syntax-case egg. I want to take an extension (say SRFI-39) and mak
o.scm"))
Now running "csi -R syntax-case some/dir/modules.scm" should look in
"some/dir" for foo.scm instead of the current directory. This is also
what happens in mzscheme when using the INCLUDE syntax.
Cheers, Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
