[Chicken-users] Scheme and Xcode?

Hi, Has Anyone tried running/debugging a scheme script/application/project in Xcode? If so, what was Your experience and do You have any tips for Others? ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo

[Chicken-users] Line numbers in error output?

Hi, Is there a way to get line numbers in the error output of the interpreter? Sincerely, ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] Line numbers in error output?

The -:aX option sounds very useful. Thanks! On Saturday, July 6, 2013, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:16:16PM -0700, J Altfas wrote: > > Error: (string-append) bad argument type - not a string: () > > > > Call history: > > > > httm.scm:42: indent-sz > > httm

[Chicken-users] Segmentation fault

Hi, Using 4.8.0.3, I compile two scripts separately and then compile the *.o files into the binary and, upon running the binary, receive a segmentation fault. Can Anyone point Me in the direction of information on how the determine the cause, such as, is it in My scripts or the csc? Sincerely,

Re: [Chicken-users] Segmentation fault

eclarations, and I'm either missing the main hook or > the complicity of declarations in each file doesn't quite line up. > > Without seeing the scripts you're compiling it might be difficult to > provide much help. Would you post them here? > > -Alan > >

Re: [Chicken-users] Segmentation fault

nient for you, with the caveat that you meant > pastiche when you said pastebin. ;-) > > http://paste.call-cc.org/ > > -Alan > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:49:58AM -0400, Frank wrote: > >coi alyn. .i tcegleki :-) > >* * I will do so as soon as I*am back at

Re: [Chicken-users] Segmentation fault

missing? On Monday, July 8, 2013, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > Hi Frank, > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:51:59 -0400 Frank > > > wrote: > > > Of course. ;-) Here are the links: > > > http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=2559393a36aeda589fa22510a8d28839

[Chicken-users] Performance difference with named let?

Hi, Is there any benefit/cost associated with using a named let instead of creating a separate procedure? Sincerely, ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

[Chicken-users] DGBp?

Does the Chicken scheme interpreter support DBGp? -- P.S.: I prefer to be reached on BitMessage at BM-2D8txNiU7b84d2tgqvJQdgBog6A69oDAx6 ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

[Chicken-users] I probably jumped the gun on this one.

Hi, I reported this as a bug in Chiecken but may have done so prematurely. I am having trouble installing SRFI-19. After some experimentation, I found I needed to install "setup-helper" first. However, such an install is insufficient. The output received using 4.8.0.3 can be found at pastebin.c

Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens

.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users I'm not sure whether this helps you, but the new 2.315 just builds fine w/ the VC 2003 toolkit when using makefile.vc and win-install.bat. Best regards, Frank ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.o

Re: [Chicken-users] booting from old Chickens

Brandon J. Van Every wrote: Frank wrote: I'm not sure whether this helps you, but the new 2.315 just builds fine w/ the VC 2003 toolkit when using makefile.vc and win-install.bat. Yes I know, as does 2.3. But the point as per the subject line is to bootstrap from older Chickens.

[Chicken-users] chicken-setup.exe from 2.41 binary fails on Win2K

Hi everyone, any idea what's going wrong here: D:\usr\local\Chicken-2.41>chicken-setup.exe Error: (string-length) bad argument type: #f D:\usr\local\Chicken-2.41>chicken-setup -help Error: (string-length) bad argument type: #f Thanks in advan