Re: [Chicken-users] Syntax of case expressions

On 03/03/2008, Alaric Snell-Pym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 Mar 2008, at 12:33 pm, Tobia Conforto wrote: > Here is a typical Unlambda program: > `r```.H.e.l.l.o. .w.o.r.l.di Typical because it's very nearly the only one commonly seen? :) > > A shortest code programming contest,

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Logo

On 19/04/2008, Leonardo Valeri Manera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/04/2008, Joshua Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been playing around with the Chicken logo. Since it currently looks > > like it consists of inked strokes, I took the metaphor a little further: > > http://www.

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Logo

On 19/04/2008, Joshua Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, I'm glad the products of procrastination aren't for naught! I did > one more side version that's a bit more web 2.0 (possibly useful as a > footer): > http://www.joshuagriffith.com/chicken/logo/chicken-glass-side-lg.png > I'll at

Re: [Chicken-users] Question

On 27/12/05, Raffael Cavallaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 25, 2005, at 5:49 PM, Benedikt Rosenau wrote: > > What made you try or choose Chicken in the first place? In particular order: 1. Availability in Debian (no other platforms at hand right now, otherwise them) 1b. Seemingly unobtru

Re: [Chicken-users] To whom it may concern: Working on TinT

On 14/02/06, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am working on TinT (Tint is not Termite), a Chicken specific > Termite workalike. Alike in the sense that is generally shares syntax > & semantics, but I feel under no constraint to be 100% faithful. (How > could I be, Termite is still evolving

Re: [Chicken-users] egg upgrading

On 24/07/06, Zbigniew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also note: when installing from disk, chicken-setup will not reorder installation to satisfy dependencies. Therefore, you should install, for example, syntax-case and regex-case first, as they are required for compilation of certain extensions. .

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Documentation

On 29/05/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan wrote: > Just a small observation -- the propensity for long, > complicated URL's isn't a win. Typing the full > www.call/cc.org is a pain; > Maybe it's just me, but I'd love shorter, memorable > URL's. I do too, but the value i

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Documentation

On 06/08/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Harri Haataja wrote: > On 29/05/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dan wrote: >> > Just a small observation -- the propensity for long, >> > complicated URL's isn't

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken/CMake succeeds on Sparc Solaris 8

On 06/08/06, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is using a 32-bit userland on a sun4u processor. I didn't test the numbers egg here, due to problems with GMP; I used the schelog egg as a test instead. Oh, there's a schelog egg! I hadn't noticed that. Cool. -- I appear to be temporaril

Re: [Chicken-users] wiki spam

On 28 Aug 2006 13:52:20 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:27:10 +0200 Hans Bulfone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it seems that some spammer has found the chicken wiki and has > put a lot of "order cialis online" and other links on it :( Thanks for not

Re: [Chicken-users] Noob Question about the Chicken Users List

On 18/08/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sean (G) wrote: As far as I know I am a registered Chicken user - however (and I know I am going to feel stupid for asking this) I can't seem to find a way of seeing the current and up to date view of the list. I can only access the l

Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor

On 11/12/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to see it integrated with Darcs. Part of what needs to happen in the Chicken community, is more people need to have proper Darcs permissions. So that they can actually set about fixing bugs. Even if they need to ask ques

Re: [Chicken-users] RedHat and Debian packages

On 07/01/07, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 12:52:11PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:15:08PM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > > But the clear disadvantage is it's only applicable to Debian systems. > > Still, I'll wager that nobody has a

Re: [Chicken-users] 256th egg: sqlora by Graham Fawcett

On 11/01/07, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graham Fawcett wrote: > On 1/10/07, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What about this: A random selected person of the group of people who >> added an egg during 3 months. Or 4 months or whatever period of time. >> That means t

Re: [Chicken-users] RedHat and Debian packages

On 12/01/07, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:56:56PM +0200, Harri Haataja wrote: > Getting a friendly maintainer on the "inside" (a Debian developer, for > example) is probably a more reliable approach. If Debian or any other distrib

Re: [Chicken-users] RedHat and Debian packages

On 14/01/07, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Integrating these packages in Debian means that only Debian users > >benefit from this effort. My idea is to support as many distributions as > >possible, not only Debian. That way this effort benefits users of > >Adamantix, > >Ubuntu, Proge

Re: [Chicken-users] RedHat and Debian packages

On 15/01/07, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The fragmentation in the Linux world is ridiculous. I'm on my 4th OS installation attempt in 3 weeks, trying to get either dual boot or triple boot systems going, because of RedHat vs. Debian issues. All the Cell SDK stuff is RPM base

Re: [Chicken-users] documentation browser

On 24/01/07, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:10:23AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: > The web-based chicken documentation browser is hereby announced: > http://callcc.org > Many thanks to Toby Butzon for setting this up! The index files > used for searching

Re: [Chicken-users] comparison of Chicken and Bigloo?

On 31/03/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/30/07, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Bigloo provides binaries for Fedora, Debian, and MS Visual Studio > platforms. Chicken does not, you have to build from source. Both are in Debian, although Chichen is stil

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Choosing chicken

On 03/06/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/2/07, Jens Axel Søgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PLT has an automated build system that each night builds what is in > the current SVN. You can download these builds from this page: >

Re: [Chicken-users] a file system using Chicken

On 07/06/07, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Okay, that's reasonable. I was under the impression that the fuse API is relatively fixed, now that it has been included in the Linux kernel, and Debian stable actually includes a somewhat recent version (2.5.something, I think), There shoul

Re: [Chicken-users] Scheme-themed cloth badges?

On 27/07/07, Alaric Snell-Pym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27 Jul 2007, at 6:55 am, felix winkelmann wrote: > > On 7/26/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> felix winkelmann scripsit: > Just out of interest, is anybody interested in cloth badges with a > lambda in parens? Ce

Re: [Chicken-users] wxWidgets

On 09/07/07, Adhi Hargo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well then, either we focus on wxWidgets, or FLTK (!). > I don't mind the latter, IMHO its interface is quite > clean and simple, a total opposite to wxWidgets albeit > somewhat limiting usage. Never encounter a buggy FLTK > app either (lack of ex

Re: [Chicken-users] confirmed builds

On 14/09/2007, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/13/07, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/13/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://chicken.wiki.br/portability > > > Please consider contributing more information to this page! > > I added ARM.

Re: [Chicken-users] synonyms for "module" sought

On 09/09/2007, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/8/07, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/7/07, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How about 'yolk'? It's what eggs are made of/what's inside eggs. > > yes, I think yolk is an awesome name. Sure. If it's goin

Re: [Chicken-users] Slow unix-sockets?

On 20/09/2007, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible that writing to/reading from UNIX domain sockets using the > unix-sockets egg is very very slow? > > When I connect the two programs using a normal UNIX pipe, then it takes > less than 0.6 seconds for a >100k message. But it ta

Re: [Chicken-users] Friendlier Chicken for Win32

On 19/12/2007, Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on my previous (program-filename) patch, I have created a > chicken dist for win32 that can be dropped anywhere. csc automatically > finds the Chicken compiler, includes and libs. This package may make the > life of

Re: [Chicken-users] Egg Atom/RSS feed.

On 16/02/2008, Leonardo Valeri Manera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15 Feb 2008 18:08:41 -0200, Mario Domenech Goulart > > Nah, Arto has solved our problem long ago! :-) > > http://trac.callcc.org/log/?limit=100&mode=stop_on_copy&format=rss > > Substitute by the name of the egg you want the RSS

Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for some eggs now available

On 13/02/2008, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, the Debian egg packages can be easily converted to RPM by the > alien program, but there might be slight differences in how each RPM > distribution does its library version numbering. E.g. the estraier egg > depends on libestraier8 pac