to a file, so csi is pretty unusable, so I have to use
it in the windows command prompt.
Matt
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Matthew David Parker wrote:
Well, I actually just wrote that wrong, it's installed to /usr/local/bin
The reason why I don't want it in C:\program
for making the \ when
it should be /. Shouldn't there be some way to change this in the
configure script?
Matt
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Matthew David Parker wrote:
I'm trying to install chicken-2.5 on windows in MSYS.
I tried using cmakeSetup to make MSYS makefiles
I'm trying to install chicken-2.5 on windows in MSYS.
I tried using cmakeSetup to make MSYS makefiles, and then I compiled them
from within MSYS by typing make and make install. I had it install
to /bin within msys. For some reason, the binaries don't seem to read any
command-line arguments.
Sorry to bother you all with a dumb scheme question, but I can't seem to
find it anywhere on the net...
How do you do binary logic in chicken?
like, what I would normally type in chez scheme is:
(logand #b1001 #b0111)
1
Thank you,
Matt
___
I have a computationaly heavy procedure which creates a list of 20
pointers to generated images. My main program cycles through these images
in the list images. It takes a long time to run my procedure
make-images, so while my program is animating the images in images, I
would like to run
Yeah, I could pass it through files or TCP or something, but that seems a
bit excessive.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 6/16/06, Matthew David Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think SRFI-18 might not be useful to me, because the computationally
intensive part is calling
Setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to include the path
for libchicken.so may help.
Thanks Kon, that did it.
Matt
Matt
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
Hello, I'm just trying to load srfi-18 and posix but it doesn't work from
the interpreter.
#;4 (use srfi-18)
Error: (load-library) unable to load library
srfi-18
libchicken.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Call history:
eval (load-library
Thanks Alejandro, I got it working with your info you gave me.
I had to have the user give me the function quoted (which is how they were
going to do it anyways) and then I just made a new quoted function that
looked like this:
`(lambda args
(let ((self (lambda (cmd) (object-ops ,id
Hi I have what is probably just a general scheme question which hopefully
can quickly be answered.
Here's a sample of what I'm trying to do:
(define jim
(lambda (fun)
(letrec ((self (lambda (a) (+ 1 a
(fun 5
(jim (lambda (b) b))
5
(jim (lambda (b) (self b)))
Ex: (w/ csi)
#;1 (define (msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img 0)) 'foo)
#;2 (procedure-information msdl.pixel)
(msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img 0))
#;3 (msdl.pixel 3)
Error: too few arguments - received 1 but expected 4: #procedure
(msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img
Alright I'll just use case-lambda for portability reasons. I'm sure the
delay from using case-lambda is minimal compared to the time it takes to
actually write a pixel to the screen or draw a rectangle.
Matt
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Kon Lovett wrote:
On May 24, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Matthew David
I just upgraded to 2.3, and I tried to compile my project, which is just a
dynamic chicken library that has foreign access to a dynamic C library.
my C library is called libxpilot_ai.so and my scheme file is xpai.ss
Normally I type:
$ chicken -dynamic xpai.ss
compiling `xpai.ss' ...
generating
Concerning readline, I like to call chicken using rlwrap. This little
tool gives you readline's capabilities without forcing a license on
you.
Oh that's a pretty nice utility there, I just tried it. It still uses the
GNU readline library, but at least it's a completely separate program
Hello, I am wondering if someone could briefly list some of the advantages
of CHICKEN over Gambit. So far I see that the CHICKEN compiler is much
easier to work with, and I think performance might be more consistant, and
CHICKEN has a bunch of eggs. All of the optional scheme functions in
. Van Every wrote:
Matthew David Parker wrote:
Hello, I am wondering if someone could briefly list some of the advantages
of CHICKEN over Gambit.
It seems that you did. :-) Are you needing more convincing or something?
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
an
intuitive way.
Ah you are from indiana.edu, I hear they are big on scheme there.
Oh yes, it's quite a nice place if you like scheme. they all use Chez
Scheme, which is really great but costs thousands of dollars for the
compiler.
On 3/27/06, Matthew David Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I don't know if it's too early to start suggesting a game to make, but I
have an idea for a pretty simple (artless) game that would actually be
quite useful to me and a lot of people (and fun).
Right now I'm working for my dad who is a computer science professor and I
changed Xpilot
Hello, I have a bad memory leak for my game I've incorperated with
Chicken.
My game is just an X windows network game that I compiled into a library
and I start the game in a chicken thread using:
(thread-start! (make-thread game_launch))
Then in my game loop, which is all in the compiled game
, which is 4 times the size
of my screen (320x240), and they have better hardware keyboards.
Matt
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 12/12/05, Matthew David Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(On an interesting side note, I got chicken to compile for ARM on my
little sharp zaurus PDA
Hello I've been trying several times over to compile chicken 2.207 for
win32. I've tried using MSYS and mingw using the instructions in this
previous post:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2005-09/msg00154.html
That method got pretty far but it got to compiling everything into
My program was using an SDL thread, actually, to run. That's probably the
problem. I got it running using native threads, using the srfi-18 module.
But, after trying it out I found that I couldn't run anything else at the
same time, so it was sort of pointless.
Consider this:
(define jim
, is there some thing you can do in the csi chicken
interpreter to make it so you can press the up arrow and cycle through
the history of your commands, like in a bash shell?
cheers,
felix
On 11/22/05, Matthew David Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have a game that is compiled as a shared
23 matches
Mail list logo
