Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-28 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Heinz, On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:53:45 +0100 ipc...@arcor.de wrote: > As promised, I've ported the pstk egg to Chicken 5, and would like to > take over as maintainer. > > https://github.com/utz82/pstk > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/utz82/pstk/master/pstk.release-info > > License has been

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-27 Thread ipcore
Ok, you've convinced me ;) Github repo is updated with history and old releases, so all cases should be covered now. I've also included the html documentation, as suggested by Vasilij. Best wishes, -Heinz On 2/26/19 3:59 PM, John Cowan wrote: >> From my viewpoint, it's not so much about

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-26 Thread ipcore
Hello John, I considered doing this, but decided it would be a good idea to start with a clean slate. Wasn't 100% sure though, that's why I explicitly mentioned it. If the general opinion is that history from SVN should be preserved, then I'll do that of course. So what do you folks think?

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-26 Thread ipcore
Hello Vasilij, Good point, I'll add the documentation to the repo. Regarding using the parens syntax for imports, that's good to know as well. I'm generally a fan of avoiding syntactic sugar that uses symbol characters, but I thought the dotted syntax was kind of neat. There are some

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-26 Thread Vasilij Schneidermann
Hey Heinz, > Haven't done any changes to the code for now, other than C5 compatibility > tweaks, and setting default tclsh to tclsh8.6. I'm amazed that this > decade-old code works on C5 pretty much out of the box. Looks good. One thing you might want to fix: C5 uses a R7RS-style organization

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-26 Thread John Cowan
If it's not too hard, you might want to extract your changes from your new git repo, drop the repo, use reposurgeon (a general VCS converter and editor), and reapply your changes. That way the history is preserved and you don't need multiple repos. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:49 AM wrote: >

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-26 Thread Vasilij Schneidermann
Hello Heinz, > I threw out the SVN backlog when importing to git, so maybe the C4 egg > should continue to use the old SVN repository instead. Otherwise pstk should > replace Chicken/Tk as the "maintained" Tk egg at this point. I do plan on > maintaining both 4 and 5 versions, in any case. This

[Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

2019-02-26 Thread ipcore
Hello, As promised, I've ported the pstk egg to Chicken 5, and would like to take over as maintainer. https://github.com/utz82/pstk https://raw.githubusercontent.com/utz82/pstk/master/pstk.release-info License has been reverted to BSD 2-clause, as the main source actually never was in the