On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:15:14 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100
> Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>
> Hey Mario ...
>
> Thanks for all the help!!
You're welcome!
> [snip]
>
>> If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake
>> on Linux, and doesn't
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> $ wget
> http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.2.0/chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ tar
> xzvf chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.2.0
> $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 install
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ ls
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hey Mario ...
Thanks for all the help!!
[snip]
> If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake
> on Linux, and doesn't depend on much more than what you'd need to
> install eggs. You'll need a C toolchain and
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:12:50 +0200
Lassi Kortela wrote:
> > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0
> > E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found
>
> 5.2.0 is in Debian Testing and Unstable.
> https://repology.org/project/chicken/versions
Thanks! I'm rusty with 'apt'
Hi Duke,
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:37 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote:
> Debian shows only:
>
> dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken
> Sorting... Done
> Full Text Search... Done
> chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64
> Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler
>
> dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0
E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found
5.2.0 is in Debian Testing and Unstable.
https://repology.org/project/chicken/versions
Debian shows only:
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken
Sorting... Done
Full Text Search... Done
chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64
Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
/19 11:09 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
You don't need to be root if you set PREFIX to a user-writable
directory.
Remove Debian chicken-bin:
2019-09-17 23:16:26 root@tinkywinky ~
# apt-get remove chicken-bin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:00:17PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> The current release of Chicken appears to be 5.1.0:
>
> https://code.call-cc.org/
Correct.
> I do not see a Debian backport:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=chicken=names=all=stretch-backports
Yeah, Debian...
On 9/17/19 10:36 PM, Vasilij Schneidermann wrote:
Hey David,
You're using version 4 of the compiler, but version 5 of the documentation. You
can tell the latter by looking for the number in the URL.
Thanks for the tip.
Taking a stab in the dark:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:46:01 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
>> 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~
>> # cat /etc/debian_version
>> 9.11
>>
>> 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~
>> # uname -a
>> Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3 (2019-09-02)
>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
Hi David,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:22:26 -0700 David Christensen
wrote:
> chicken-users:
>
> I am Chicken noob with (e-mail addresses redacted):
Welcome!
> 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~
> # cat /etc/debian_version
> 9.11
>
> 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~
> # uname -a
> Linux
Hey David,
You're using version 4 of the compiler, but version 5 of the documentation. You
can tell the latter by looking for the number in the URL.
Vasilij___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
chicken-users:
I am Chicken noob with (e-mail addresses redacted):
2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~
# cat /etc/debian_version
9.11
2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~
# uname -a
Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3 (2019-09-02)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
2019-09-17 22:15:35
Claude,
I'm guessing you didn't install chicken first prior to running the tests.
The finalizer error only occurs with older chickens. I can't reproduce
the problem with
make PLATFORM=blah PREFIX=$PWD/tmp all install check
On Sep 13, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Claude Marinier wrote:
IBM ThinkCenter,
+
+ * New version
+
+ -- Joerg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net Thu, 13 Feb 2009 14:08:00 +0200
+
chicken (3.2.0-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added directory information to texi documentation file.
diff --git a/debian/chicken-bin.install b/debian/chicken-bin.install
index
On 13/02/2008, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the Debian egg packages can be easily converted to RPM by the
alien program, but there might be slight differences in how each RPM
distribution does its library version numbering. E.g. the estraier egg
depends on libestraier8 package
Well, my experience with RPM is also a bit dated, and it was limited
to translating custom Debian kernel packages to RedHat and Mandrake
RPMs. In my case, it worked well because all three distributions used
the same script to update the kernel image installation, and of course
the kernel has no
Well, the Debian egg packages can be easily converted to RPM by the
alien program, but there might be slight differences in how each RPM
distribution does its library version numbering. E.g. the estraier egg
depends on libestraier8 package in Debian, but that could be named
something completely
On 13/02/2008, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have debianized a number of eggs and have uploaded the
resulting i386 binary packages to the Debian repository on
chicken.wiki.br. Information on how to access that repository is here:
http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian packages
Hi all,
I have debianized a number of eggs and have uploaded the
resulting i386 binary packages to the Debian repository on
chicken.wiki.br. Information on how to access that repository is here:
http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian packages
The debianized eggs are mostly the prerequisites to
The Debian repository on chicken.wiki.br now includes Chicken
packages for the Debian armel architecture (ARM EABI v4). Thanks to
Matthew Welland, who built and tested those packages.
-Ivan
Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I have compiled Debian packages for Chicken
Hi all,
I have compiled Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 on Intel
architectures. Instructions on how to install them are here:
http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian%20packages
Let me know if you have any problems or suggestions.
-Ivan
___
Chicken
Thanks for doing this!
BTW, if you publish directions on how to make the .deb's I'll make attempt
to make them for ARM (targeting OS2008). If anyone else is doing this let
me know.
Matt
--
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 07:42:58 am Ivan Raikov wrote:
Hi all,
I have compiled Debian
http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin
It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed.
-Robin
--
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
Hi Robin,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:24:10 -0800 Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin
It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
If not, I'll endeavour to
Hi!
It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed.
BTW, don't forget that Debian is ported to 11 architectures. It may run
fine on i386. But does Chicken run fine
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:49:26 +0100 Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed.
BTW, don't forget that
Hallo,
Mario Domenech Goulart escreveu:
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:49:26 +0100 Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's too bad though that the Chicken version in Sid is still 2.5.
Agreed.
I emailed the maintainer once offering help for packaging newer
Chickens,
Hallo,
On 4/22/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian packages for the AMD64 architecture, version 2.6, are in:
http://www.ventonegro.org/chicken/
Their version is 0.1 to allow a smooth upgrade when the official ones hit sid.
Now with i386 packages, too.
--
-alex
Thanks, Alex and Michael!
I have added links to the packages at
http://chicken.wiki.br/debian packages
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Hallo,
On 4/22/07, Michael McDermott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the release 2.6 package I created for my own system.
Debian packages for the AMD64 architecture, version 2.6, are in:
http://www.ventonegro.org/chicken/
Their version is 0.1 to allow a smooth upgrade when the
Hallo,
Does anybody know if 2.6 is close to hitting Debian unstable?
Cheers,
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
,
Does anybody know if 2.6 is close to hitting Debian unstable?
Cheers,
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Hallo,
On 4/22/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably a question for Davide Puricelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
who is the Debian maintainer of the Chicken package. There is
apparently a wishlist item filed for an update to 2.6:
35 matches
Mail list logo
