On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:11:10 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote:
>> Sure. What should it be called?
>
> Is "chicken-tools" ok? Or "chicken-integrations" or "chicken-contrib"?
> Or even more generically, "chicken-scheme" which doesn't exist yet.
>
> It could be "chicken-emacs" but Dan suggested:
>
>> an
Sure. What should it be called?
Is "chicken-tools" ok? Or "chicken-integrations" or "chicken-contrib"?
Or even more generically, "chicken-scheme" which doesn't exist yet.
It could be "chicken-emacs" but Dan suggested:
an organization that focuses on Chicken tool integration would be good;
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:59:01 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote:
>> Sounds good to me. Thanks for organizing this.
>
> Great. Mario, can you create the org since from our initial group of
> contributors you are the one most closely associated with Chicken?
Sure. What should it be called?
All the
Sounds good to me. Thanks for organizing this.
Great. Mario, can you create the org since from our initial group of
contributors you are the one most closely associated with Chicken?
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:41:31 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote:
>> Please note that what I wrote was just a suggestion to prevent future
>> problems. I don't mean to impose anything. If you think using GitHub,
>> GitLab or whatever git host available would be a good solution, that's
>> absolutely fine
On 17/11/2020 18:41, Lassi Kortela wrote:
> Given:
>
> - a GitHub organization would be preferred for ease of maintenance by
> Dan and Vasilij who have written some of the Chicken Emacs support so far
>
> - you and I don't object to GH
>
> - nobody else has said anything
>
> - a decision seems
Please note that what I wrote was just a suggestion to prevent future
problems. I don't mean to impose anything. If you think using GitHub,
GitLab or whatever git host available would be a good solution, that's
absolutely fine by me. I use GitHub myself. It was just a small remark
to avoid
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:36:24 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote:
>> Switching git hosting solutions should be just a matter of changing the git
>> URL.
>
> AFAICT this can be achieved by turning off the issue tracker and wiki
> on GitHub repos. This would mean we use the mailing list, Chicken's
> issue
Switching git hosting solutions should be just a matter of changing the git URL.
AFAICT this can be achieved by turning off the issue tracker and wiki on
GitHub repos. This would mean we use the mailing list, Chicken's issue
tracker, or email/irc for coordination. Since it's just a few tools,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:14:03 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote:
> We spoke with Mario and Dan about gathering Git repos for all the
> Chicken Emacs packages under one roof, and Dan suggested adding other
> tools such as an LSP server into the mix.
>
> We thought it'd be convenient to start an
We spoke with Mario and Dan about gathering Git repos for all the
Chicken Emacs packages under one roof, and Dan suggested adding other
tools such as an LSP server into the mix.
We thought it'd be convenient to start an organization on GitHub or
GitLab to do this, but are not sure whether the
11 matches
Mail list logo
