Hi,
>> How long does it usually take?
>
> how long do you have?
I can run it tomorrow evening when I get home from work.
Regards,
@ndy
--
andy...@ashurst.eu.org
http://www.ashurst.eu.org/
0x7EBA75FF
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
On 9/9/12, Andy Bennett wrote:
> How long does it usually take?
how long do you have?
--
\js [http://or8.net/~johns/] : "complete obscure contrariness"
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi,
>> The threads test started showing me black swirls on a pink background,
>> that grew in synch together, then started again, but after a few hours
>> it slowly started to change into a glittering tunnel of rainbow light
>> and I started to hear voices whispering at me in an unfamiliar
>> lang
> Alaric Snell-Pym writes:
> On 09/09/12 15:56, john saylor wrote:
>> also, if the language turns out to be java, you should be worried-
>> deeply worried ...
> It was saying something like "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Riastradh R'lyeh
> wgah'nagl fhtagn"
Did the program you transfor
On 09/09/12 15:56, john saylor wrote:
also, if the language turns out to be java, you should be worried-
deeply worried ...
It was saying something like "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Riastradh R'lyeh
wgah'nagl fhtagn"
ABS
--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
___
whoa
On 9/9/12, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
> The threads test started showing me black swirls on a pink background,
> that grew in synch together, then started again, but after a few hours
> it slowly started to change into a glittering tunnel of rainbow light
> and I started to hear voices whisperi
> I just ran the experiment on V8 with Spock, this time using the "-optimize"
> switch. The results are:
>
> Execution times using V8 (Chrome 21.0.1180.89):
>
> Gambit-JSScheme2JS Spock
> fib35 .801.541.9x2.40 3.0x
>
>
> The threads test started showing me black swirls on a pink background,
> that grew in synch together, then started again, but after a few hours
> it slowly started to change into a glittering tunnel of rainbow light
> and I started to hear voices whispering at me in an unfamiliar
> language.
>
On 2012-09-08, at 4:54 PM, Felix
wrote:
>> In my experiments (updated since we last talked to the most current version
>> of Chrome, Firefox and Safari) I have found that the performance of Spock
>> (and Scheme2JS) varies a lot between JavaScript VMs. For example Nitro
>> (Safari 6.0) runs
On 07/09/12 23:23, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
And it's the same on Safari 6, OSX 10.7
On 8 September 2012 00:21, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
All good on Chrome 21.0.1180.79 and Firefox 14, both on Linux, except for
(every-of #t)
=> #f ; *** wrong ***, desired result:
=> #t
I had that on Linux 64-bit
> In my experiments (updated since we last talked to the most current version
> of Chrome, Firefox and Safari) I have found that the performance of Spock
> (and Scheme2JS) varies a lot between JavaScript VMs. For example Nitro
> (Safari 6.0) runs JS code generated by Spock about 20 to 30 times
On 2012-09-08, at 8:28 AM, Felix
wrote:
> Hey, folks!
>
> Many, many thanks for testing so pervasively. This is indeed good
> news, as it shows that the stuff generally works. As you all reported,
> some test-cases fail, but this is known and caused by minor bugs or
> R5RS incompatibilities th
On 08/09/12 14:49, Andy Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Iceweasel (Firefox) 10.0.7 from Debian Wheezy (Testing).
>
>
>> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/spock/test.html
>
> (eq? car car) FAIL
>
> (not (eq? (quote bitBlt) (string->symbol "bitBlt"))) FAIL
>
> (not (string->number
Hi,
I have Iceweasel (Firefox) 10.0.7 from Debian Wheezy (Testing).
> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/spock/test.html
(eq? car car) FAIL
(not (eq? (quote bitBlt) (string->symbol "bitBlt"))) FAIL
(not (string->number "1e3" 16)) FAIL
tests succeded: 204
tests failed: 3
total nu
Hey, folks!
Many, many thanks for testing so pervasively. This is indeed good
news, as it shows that the stuff generally works. As you all reported,
some test-cases fail, but this is known and caused by minor bugs or
R5RS incompatibilities that result from the way Scheme is mapped onto
JS semantic
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:40:46 +0200 Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
> On 8 September 2012 00:26, Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:18:05 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart
>> wrote:
>>> I think the wrong example is:
>>>
>>> (string->symbol #t) ==> #t
>>> BUT EXPECTED #f
>>>
>>>
On 8 September 2012 00:26, Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:18:05 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>> I think the wrong example is:
>>
>> (string->symbol #t) ==> #t
>> BUT EXPECTED #f
>>
>> On all browsers I get a warning like:
>>
>> ReferenceError: 25m
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:18:05 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Felix
> wrote:
>
>> There has been a new version of Spock (0.9) (that Scheme->JS compiler
>> thingy) that uses a slightly changed unwinding strategy ("return"
>> instead of "throw"), wh
Hi Felix,
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Felix
wrote:
> There has been a new version of Spock (0.9) (that Scheme->JS compiler
> thingy) that uses a slightly changed unwinding strategy ("return"
> instead of "throw"), which promises better compatibility with stupid
> browsers and flak
And it's the same on Safari 6, OSX 10.7
On 8 September 2012 00:21, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> All good on Chrome 21.0.1180.79 and Firefox 14, both on Linux, except for
>
> (every-of #t)
> => #f ; *** wrong ***, desired result:
> => #t
>
> Speed is OK too.
>
> On 8 September 2012 00:01, Felix
> wrot
All good on Chrome 21.0.1180.79 and Firefox 14, both on Linux, except for
(every-of #t)
=> #f ; *** wrong ***, desired result:
=> #t
Speed is OK too.
On 8 September 2012 00:01, Felix
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There has been a new version of Spock (0.9) (that Scheme->JS compiler
> thingy) that uses a
Felix scripsit:
> If you have a minute, please point your browser to
>
> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/spock/test.html
Works fast under Chrome 22.0.1229.14 beta-m, slowly (with
a warning dialogue box) under IE 7.0.5730.13, both running on
Windows XP SP3.
> http://www.call-wi
Both are fairly swift for me. OSX, Chrome Version 21.0.1180.89
-Dan
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Felix <
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There has been a new version of Spock (0.9) (that Scheme->JS compiler
> thingy) that uses a slightly changed unwinding strateg
23 matches
Mail list logo
