Updates:
Owner: f...@chromium.org
Cc: -f...@chromium.org
Comment #24 on issue 3285 by j...@chromium.org: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
(No comment was entered for this change.)
-
Comment #23 on issue 3285 by kbrus...@alum.mit.edu: NPConstructFunctionPtr
not working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
That's great to hear. Hoping this makes it into the product soon.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #22 on issue 3285 by f...@chromium.org: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
I used Java SE6u13, and LiveConnectTests pass. I am looking for someone to
take over
the patch and make a layout te
Comment #21 on issue 3285 by kbrus...@alum.mit.edu: NPConstructFunctionPtr
not working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
I think that should be sufficient to make the new Java Plug-In work. You
can verify with the rudimentary
confor
Comment #20 on issue 3285 by f...@chromium.org: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
I have a work-around of the problem:
In V8, I changed it to allow things like:
var a = new npobject(...);
npobject
Updates:
Owner: j...@chromium.org
Comment #19 on issue 3285 by a...@chromium.org: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
I believe this is a V8 issue as V8 has to detect the javascript 'new'
syn
Updates:
Owner: ana...@chromium.org
Labels: -JavaScript -Mstone-X Mstone-2.1
Comment #18 on issue 3285 by j...@chromium.org: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
This is an NPAPI issue,
Updates:
Owner: b...@chromium.org
Comment #17 on issue 3285 by j...@chromium.org: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Please assign this to someone in V8. Then give me feedback on the
approp
Comment #16 on issue 3285 by kbrus...@alum.mit.edu: NPConstructFunctionPtr
not working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Would it be possible to have engineering effort invested on this issue? The
new NPConstructFunctionPtr is
worki
Comment #10 on issue 3285 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NPConstructFunctionPtr not
working correctly in NPRuntime implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
We have to add some plubming to the javascript bindings to make this work.
Please
keep it open.
--
You received t
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #8 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Labels: -Mstone-1.0 Mstone-1.1
--
You rece
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #7 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, the NPConstructFunctionPtr was added in FF 3 to support LiveConnect in
the new NPAPI / NPRuntime Java
Plug-In (as
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #6 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
NPN_Construct is very recent, most likely introduced in Firefox 3.0 to
enable support
for live connect via new plugin.
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #5 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I downloaded the JDK referenced in this bug.
Then I tried to run the test case provided.
But I think I need more java lib
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #4 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW - the NPN_Construct() call is brand new.
It was first introduced in Firefox 3.0b1.
--
You received this message
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From initial investigation it seems that V8's implementation of 'new' might
need some
change. Firefox calls the new Ja
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #2 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Assigned
Owner: [EMAIL PROTE
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
Comment #1 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Untriaged
Labels: -Area-Misc
Issue 3285: NPConstructFunctionPtr not working correctly in NPRuntime
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3285
New issue report by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Product Version : 0.2.149.30 (2200)
URLs (if applicable) : Attached test case
Other browsers tested:
Add OK
19 matches
Mail list logo
