http://www.paperfrag.com/?p=22
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EM
Well I must say it runs like hot doggys in Win2k, it runs very well
indeed and is truely fast.
Lets hope the bears don't kill off google before its time. I think the
killing of 2k years before its official
demise is a breech of trust on MS's part.
On Sep 18, 1:55 pm, "Humberto Cruz" <[EMAIL PROT
So are we saying it doesn’t work on 2k or that it wasn't designed to
work on 2k. I can appreciate that some of the code that is being used
is hidden from users and
for that matter developers, but that should not have been used as an
excuse to breach the trust of 2k purchasers by MS's removal of
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it will be very valuable to us to maintain our own layering
> here. It sounds like Dan and you have an idea of how to do it.
>
> Perhaps in parallel--or when time permits--we should work to add the
> APIs to NSS
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:23 PM, deanm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is by design, Chromium tries to be kind to other applications,
> and it notifies the operating system when it is backgrounded (or a tab
> is backgrounded), so parts of the resident memory can be swapped out
> and the physic
Coming into this thread late, I assume everything here applies for Mac
as well? Right now we're "blocked" on getting the win32 out of
SSLClientSocket to get http linking for TestShell, so I wanted to see
if there was anything we could do to help out -- or if we needed to do
anything at all.
On Fr
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be helpful if CppBoundClass provided a means to discover the method
> name that was used to invoke a JavaScript callback. This is particularly
> true for the fallback callback. There are a number of ways i
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Mike Pinkerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming into this thread late, I assume everything here applies for Mac
> as well? Right now we're "blocked" on getting the win32 out of
> SSLClientSocket to get http linking for TestShell, so I wanted to see
> if there w
Apart from the fact that it's difficult just to figure out what you
exactly mean, the parts that I do understand make no sense at all.
From what I understand you're saying that Google is siding with MS
because they aren't supporting Win 2k... Well that's just nonsense for
the following reasons (amo
Well, yeah I can certainly do that, but it sounded from the thread
that Dan was already heading down that road, and I wasn't sure how far
he'd gotten. In some quick stubbing, I also ran into windows'isms in
UploadDataStream. Wasn't sure about the plan there.
I wasn't sure how much of the wheel I
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Mike Pinkerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> we're "blocked" on getting the win32 out of SSLClientSocket to get http
>>> linking for TestShell
>>
>> Can't you just stub out the SSL bits of HTTP for now? Most (all?) of
>> the layout tests don't need SSL.
>
> Wel
Ross,
Alwin is mostly correct, but he does not note that MS will stop
providing updates for W2K in 2010. That will force most remaining W2K
users onto XP or Vista (or a server version of them), or out of the
Windows world entirely. Hardware drivers for W2K is already a
problem, as are software
2008/9/20 Alwin Garside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So just shut up and either stop using Windows 2000, and install some
> decent operating system (like Ubuntu) ;-) or just don't use Google
> Chrome.
Or contribute Windows 2000 support to Google Chrome. It may not be
accepted by Google, but it may well
I thought the plans for mac osx did not involve nss. I think we should do
an implementation based on the mac ssl apis so that we get good integration
w/ the keychain or what have you. right?
-darin
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 a
I had thought so, too, but on IRC there was some talk of using nss
but interfacing to the native keyring somehow. So who knows.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the plans for mac osx did not involve nss. I think we should do
> an implementat
Hi Evan,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Evan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I believe within a given execution context it's synchronous, but for
> cleanliness anyway I'd prefer 2 or 3. 2 sounds more sane to me; the
> only reason we have a fallback callback (I believe) is for one test.
I was going to add a new menu item in the context menu, and would like
to be able to display localized strings instead of a fixed string. In
particular, I'm going to support both en-US and zh-CN.
The steps to add a resource string seem to be:
1. Add an XML stanza in chrome\app\generated_resource
I was looking at UploadDataStream a while back. I think the windows'isms
were just for reading a file from disk. I think the recommendation was
to make a very basic File class in base or net for reading/writing to a
file and use that class in UploadDataStream. We may even be able to use
some co
This is mostly correct. generated_resources.grd is not generated from
another file. It is the source file that we manually edit to add
strings. The step that's missing is that we send generated_resources.grd
to our translators and they provide us with the localized xtb files (some
amount of han
Is there somewhere an official list of parameters to pass to Chromium
(or Google Chrome), like:
--memory-model=high
--new-http
--magic_browzR
etc
Thanks.
Best regards.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Not sure if this is documented anywhere but check out
src/chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc
(http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc?view=markup)
Thanks,
Niranjan
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Matías <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there somewhere an
It'd be good to put this info on the developer site somewhere.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is mostly correct. generated_resources.grd is not generated from
> another file. It is the source file that we manually edit to add
> strings. The step that's mi
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I bet you five bucks we can layer SSLClientSocket on top of
> TCPClientSocket by creating a little nspr i/o layer that
> talks to a memory buffer. I did this with OpenSSL some time
> ago, I figure I can do it with nss, too.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Wan-Teh Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I bet you five bucks we can layer SSLClientSocket on top of
>> TCPClientSocket by creating a little nspr i/o layer that
>> talks to a memory buffer. I did this with OpenSSL some time
>> ago, I figure I can do it with nss
Hi All,
As I've mentioned a few times on this list, I'm developing an embedded
browser control based on the test_shell project. Below is a synopsis of the
design that I've implemented. If there is interest in seeing this included
as part of the chromium code base then I'll make an effort to re-f
25 matches
Mail list logo
