[chromium-dev] Re: More plugin questions

2009-03-06 Thread John Abd-El-Malek
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:59 PM, eager_learner vijay.sankar.ra...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Plugin Gurus The following link is very well written and I hope it still holds good http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/plugin-architecture I have some followup

[chromium-dev] Re: Profile Corruption, cause?

2009-03-06 Thread Mohamed Mansour
Hello, thanks for your reply. I understand about User Agreement between the user and Google, I thought a Stack trace would help a little to figure out what is really going on. People are getting really annoyed (on the forums) since their browser quickly crashes when they open it, after couple

[chromium-dev] Re: More plugin questions

2009-03-06 Thread Marshall Greenblatt
Hi Vijay, Once you have your code linking with chromium, you have two options for registering your internal NPAPI plugin. 1. Add an entry to the builtin_plugins array in webkit/glue/plugins/plugin_list_win.cc PluginList::PlatformInit(). 2. Use the following approach that can be called from

[chromium-dev] Re: Profile Corruption, cause?

2009-03-06 Thread Erik Kay
One thing that would help is if some of the users who are running into this would be willing to share their whole profile with us. While our best guess is that this is sqlite corruption, we don't know for sure. Even if it is sqlite corruption, having the specific db might help us figure out how

[chromium-dev] Re: Profile Corruption, cause?

2009-03-06 Thread Erik Kay
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Brett Wilson bre...@google.com wrote: Getting the database has helped in a few cases where it turned out some assumptions were being violated, but if the sqlite data structures are corrupted, getting the DB has never been helpful to diagnose the root cause. It

[chromium-dev] Spam on chromium-reviews

2009-03-06 Thread John Abd-El-Malek
I'm guessing I'm not the only one who's irritated by it. Can we make it so that only members can post to chromium-reviews? We can automatically subscribe everyone who's sent a review in the last month or something. What do people think? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[chromium-dev] Re: Spam on chromium-reviews

2009-03-06 Thread Peter Kasting
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote: I'm guessing I'm not the only one who's irritated by it. Can we make it so that only members can post to chromium-reviews? We can automatically subscribe everyone who's sent a review in the last month or something.

[chromium-dev] Re: Metalink (XML Download Description) support

2009-03-06 Thread Adam Langley
I'd really like to see Chromium support Metalink. Metalinks are simple XML files that list mirrors, checksum, signatures, and other info useful for making downloads more robust. [1] Metalink looks like a neat spec. However, I don't think all that complexity belongs in Chromium itself. Since

[chromium-dev] Re: Spam on chromium-reviews

2009-03-06 Thread Ian Fette
I enabled moderation for new senders. This shouldn't cause the problem Peter mentions below, though may cause delays for new posters. Hopefully between myself and others we can moderate reasonably efficiently (we're already doing this for dev, many -bugs messages get held for moderation because

[chromium-dev] Re: Profile Corruption, cause?

2009-03-06 Thread Scott Hess
If SQLite is crashing due to corruption in the database, we should be able to get Dr Hipp to help fix it. But we'd need a repeatable case to send to him. If we had a database which demonstrated this, I could certainly see about crafting a simplified database of example data to replicate the

[chromium-dev] Re: Unit tests and anonymous namespaces.

2009-03-06 Thread Scott Hess
I just wanted to make sure I understood your proposal. Right now, test classes want to be in the anonymous namespace so that unit test files do not have to coordinate with each other in the naming of test classes. With your proposal, the thing which is exposed outside of the anonymous namespace

[chromium-dev] Re: Unit tests and anonymous namespaces.

2009-03-06 Thread 陈智昌
2009/3/6 Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org: I just wanted to make sure I understood your proposal. Right now, test classes want to be in the anonymous namespace so that unit test files do not have to coordinate with each other in the naming of test classes. With your proposal, the thing which

[chromium-dev] Re: Unit tests and anonymous namespaces.

2009-03-06 Thread Scott Hess
2009/3/6 William Chan (陈智昌) willc...@chromium.org: 2009/3/6 Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org: I just wanted to make sure I understood your proposal. Right now, test classes want to be in the anonymous namespace so that unit test files do not have to coordinate with each other in the naming of

[chromium-dev] Re: More plugin questions

2009-03-06 Thread John Abd-El-Malek
Hi Vijay, It sounds like reading up on NPAPI and how Windows applications paint is in order :) Here are some documents: Here's the high level link about NPAPI on the Mozilla docs, links to samples etc: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Plugins This is the reference for NPAPI: