Thanks for the info! Could you dump this into a bug report?
Thanks,
-Darin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
It would be nice to track down the source of the null
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks for the info! Could you dump this into a bug report?
Added to http://crbug.com/9060 ...
--Craig
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
The {0} initialization zeros out the entire struct, not just the first
member of the struct.
These two are functionally equivalent:
char foo[10] = {0};
MyStruct bar = {0};
and
char foo[10];
memset(foo, 0, sizeof(foo));
MyStruct bar;
memset(bar, 0, sizeof(bar));
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
Ian, are you OK with #1? (I ask since I think you're the only one who's
been concerned with it so far.)
Yes
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@chromium.orgwrote:
+chromium-dev.
On Sat, Mar
+chromium-dev
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
*If you don't care where various bits of the localStorage implementation
live and you aren't scared about letting stuff out of the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
*If you don't care where various bits of the localStorage
Lol, seems I got the same name in the first place. Anyways moving
towards the
explanation of Bens points pointed in direction of linux (and in
general I do share
his views wholeheartedly).
On Jan 29, 7:32 pm, Paweł Prażak kojot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 10:18 pm, Ben Goodger (Google)
I think this file is basically useless at this point. All the information in
it is encoding in src/DEPS (it now has a webkit_revision VAR). Any objection
to getting rid of this file? It's one fewer thing for the merger to keep
track of. I'll delete the file tomorrow if I hear no objections.
Ojan
My merge tracker still uses it. I can rewrite to switch over to DEPS,
though it may not be tomorrow :)
:DG
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
I think this file is basically useless at this point. All the information in
it is encoding in src/DEPS (it now has a
