On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Evan Martin wrote:
>
> With that in mind I think we should explicitly use
> -fno-strict-aliasing until someone is willing to take the time to run
> buildbots, track down regressions, etc. for the other configuration.
I tend to agree. Many programmers, including m
If you're using the safesync URL
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/continuous/LATEST/REVISION in
your .gclient file, your "gclient sync" command should be failing
now.
This is because the URL has been replaced by three platform-specific
URLs:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/continuous/linux/LA
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Ted Mielczarek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't find this info anywhere on the dev site (maybe I just
> wasn't looking hard enough), but I'm curious as to what version of
> Visual C++ you're using for the official Chrome builds.
It's Visual C++ 2005.
(The official bui
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Chris Bentzel wrote:
> I'm using them as a learning exercise for the network stack - and I'm
> guessing that they will help debug behavior in the future as well.
>
> I don't intend to add additional functionality over the standard tools
> - in fact, I promise you
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Tim Steele wrote:
> I think those are defined in net_error_list.h and that means timed out?
Yes, -7 means net::ERR_TIMED_OUT.
Wan-Teh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View arch
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
>
> I've noticed some WX sections in memory, but only on modern Ubuntus. I
> meant to track down the issue today, but I've been hung up on a stack
> corruption bug.
>
> However, the binary doesn't contain any such sections for me. See
> objdump -
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention - there's a single file that may not be complete,
> base/crypto/signature_verifier_nss.cc - this is because the FreeBSD
> port of NSS is too old and doesn't have a function it needs. I'll get
> to that at some point soon, b
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Evan Martin wrote:
>
> I got a crash on an SSL site today.
> It was http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=18907
Fumitoshi Ukai just fixed that crash in r23696 last night.
Wan-Teh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Develo
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall
Greenblatt wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself consistently
> forgetting the relationship between the various managers/handlers and order
> in which the asynchronous calls take place. Does anyone currently h
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20(valgrind)/builds/1671/steps/valgrind%20test:%20unit/logs/stdio
> introduces 26 new unintialized memory references and two leaks.
> That's a big enough batch that it might
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:13 PM, LivioSoares wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Debian, with GCC 4.3.3 and am current getting a
> compilation error while compiling Chromium:
>
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> chromium/src/net/base/net_util.cc: In function
> 'bool::IsIDNComponentSafe(
Ben,
I believe the GCC warning you want is -Wreturn-type, which is enabled
if we specify -Wall:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
Are we not compiling with -Wall?
Wan-Teh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers ma
Thanks for creating the FlakyTest label.
One question: if a test *always* fails under a particular configuration,
for example, on a particular platform or when running under Purify,
it isn't a flaky test, right? I assume "flaky" means intermittent failure.
Wan-Teh
--~--~-~--~~-
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Cowx wrote:
>
> How can I upload multipart form data (including a file) via HTTP POST?
> Is there something already written in the net package (or elsewhere)
> for this task? If so, can someone please point me to what class to
> use.
You can use the URLReque
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> src/chrome/browser/cocoa/status_bubble_mac.mm is the UI that displays
> the message. The message itself comes from the cross-platform code,
> but you can probably trace that by setting some breakpoints in the UI
> code.
Yes, also set a br
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:18 PM, nakro wrote:
>
> but still this is what i get : (in hebrew it gets stuck, so this is an
> improvement)
>
> [ FAILED ] UnloadTest.BrowserCloseTabWhenOtherTabHasListener
> [ FAILED ] LoginPromptTest.TestBasicAuth
> [ FAILED ] LoginPromptTest.TestDigestAuth
> [
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Mohamed Mansour
wrote:
> Weird,
>
> I just received this error while compiling a "fresh" build on linux.
> Downloaded the tarball, and hammer (clean). The first error I saw on the
> screen was:
> cd: 1: can't cd to
> /auto/filer28.mtvvolmtvhome51/chrome-svn/tarba
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
> /MP ? If so, that's normal. Make sure you also kill mspdbsrv.exe.
No, I didn't add /MP to essential.vsprops because I know it doesn't
work well with Visual Studio 2005.
I did a web search for the linker error message
LINK : fatal
I am using Visual Studio 2005 SP1 with hotfix 935225 on Windows XP SP3.
I checked out a chromium source tree from scrash, using
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/continuous/LATEST/REVISION as the
safesync_url, and did a Release build.
I got the following link error while building browser_tests_
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Nick Baum wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
>
> Kirill - thanks for the intro.
>
> Nick - I just wanted to follow up on that strange issue with Chrome I
> mentioned when we last talked. When I load Chrome, the favorites boxes load
> instantly, though
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:
>
> Hint:
>
> If you write your changelist bug line like this:
>
> http://crbug.com/7991
>
> instead of like this:
>
> BUG=7991
>
> your bug line will be linkified and clickable in numerous places (like
> the buildbot pages, Rietveld, t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Smita wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if this is the correct forum to put in this question,
> but I was just curious to know where my application lacked, and why it
> did not qualify.
> Your feedback is greatly appreciated!
Hi Smita,
Our product manager Bria
You can look at url_request.{h,cc}, which is in the net module.
You can also look at the next layer up, which has two sets of files:
1. resource_dispatcher_host.{h,cc}: I think this is exactly what you
wanted, but it doesn't cover the network traffic generated by the next
set of files.
2. url_fet
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Smita wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am putting forth the problem of client authentication handling in
> Chrome, as I understand it. Kindly correct me if this isn't correct.
>
> I understand that SSL handshake fails when a server asks for the
> client certificate. Curren
Chromium's network stack has been undergoing a rewrite to
make it more portable. The new HTTP stack is now being
used in the 2.0 Dev channel releases. I put together a
network stack roadmap document to describe the remaining
work in the rewrite and the future work we're considering:
http://dev.c
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>> Another idea is to work harder with Ubuntu to provide the "ia32"
>> NSPR/NSS libs for x86_64 in Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. That'd be the best
>> solution but require a lot of red tape.
&g
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Dean McNamee wrote:
>
> I don't understand why we need to import all of this code just so we
> can build an .so.
>
> Why don't we just take the .so's from the 32-bit package we're already
> using, and stick them into our .deb? We can check them into svn if
> don'
Dean,
I agree with all your suggestions.
Re: typos/spelling errors: I recently started to fix typos/spelling
errors in the description of a CL I'm reviewing by clicking "Edit Issue".
(Rietveld allows a reviewer to edit the description of a CL.)
Wan-Teh
--~--~-~--~~~
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜)
wrote:
> Therefore, the
> only thing necessary to do is to download Windows SDK 6.1
> at
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e6e1c3df-a74f-4207-8586-711ebe331cdc&DisplayLang=en
> and install it (and integrate it with
hromium will only
send a HTTP Authorization header after receiving a 401 Authorization
Required response to the first attempt of the request.
Wan-Teh Chang
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, chan
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It appears that scoped_refptr meets the CopyConstructible requirement but
> not the Assignable requirement.
Are you sure scoped_refptr is not assignable? It should be.
We have used scoped_refptr in standard libr
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Amanda Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Linux and Darwin are only superficially similar, and the differences get
> larger the closer to the kernel we get. I realize I'm being repetitious
> here :-), but generally speaking, starting with the assumption that one
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Ibrar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on (Issue 4152: Porting directory_lister to
> POSIX.). While looking at the code a question bumped into my mind that
> why we are creating thread using
>
> unsigned thread_id;
> t
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to be so persistent, but I don't understand why you need those things.
> Can you provide some specific examples?
> As far as I know, we need the ability to have shared memory. It seems like
> we can do that with mmap
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I bet you five bucks we can layer SSLClientSocket on top of
> TCPClientSocket by creating a little nspr i/o layer that
> talks to a memory buffer. I did this with OpenSSL some time
> ago, I figure I can do it with nss, too.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it will be very valuable to us to maintain our own layering
> here. It sounds like Dan and you have an idea of how to do it.
>
> Perhaps in parallel--or when time permits--we should work to add the
> APIs to NSS
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Wan-Teh Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I found that I documented the 'poll' method of PRFileDesc
>> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/NSPR_Poll_Met
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Rick Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Chrome appears to use CRLs for SSL cert status checking. Are there any
> plans to use OCSP instead, or primarily use OCSP with a fallback to
> CRLs?
We should primarily use OCSP with a fallback to CRLs.
If we aren't doi
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I bet you five bucks we can layer SSLClientSocket on top of
> TCPClientSocket by creating a little nspr i/o layer that
> talks to a memory buffer. I did this with OpenSSL some time
> ago, I figure I can do it with nss, too.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In previous discussion with Darin, it seemed we
>> wanted to use epoll rather than poll. This
>> implies that we want to not use NSPR for our
>> network I/O, and thus implies that we want to
>> write an NSPR I/O layer
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Avi Drissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to land some preliminary work on the x509 support for the Mac (see
> http://codereview.chromium.org/2963). I want to do some refactoring of the
> common parts, but there are no unit tests. Amanda and I are going
I agree that we should use nonblocking I/O instead of one-thread-per-connection.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's another design choice to make:
> whether to write an NSPR I/O layer so we can use
> our own TCPClientSocket for all network I/O,
> or
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Rob Stradling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you do remove Chrome's own list of EV Policy OIDs and use the
> Windows list instead...
> What will the Linux and Mac versions do, given that Mozilla's list of
> EV Policy OIDs is in PSM, not NSS ?
You are right. We
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Ibrar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on porting "ssl_client_socket" to Linux. The current
> implementation of "ssl_client_socket" uses Windows Security API. I wonder
> why we have not used NSS library to implement SSL socket in Wi
Hi Rob,
Ian has answered all of your questions. I'll just add a supplemental answer
to question 3.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Rob Stradling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3. Chrome on Windows appears to rely on the certificates found in the
> Microsoft Trusted Root Certificate Store, but
45 matches
Mail list logo
