Nope, but I've cc'ed myself. Listening to the channel should keep script alive.
Adam
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Antony Sargent wrote:
> Adam, speaking of garbage collection and content scripts, have you seen
> http://crbug.com/17410?
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Adam, speaking of garbage collection and content scripts, have you seen
http://crbug.com/17410?
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:12 AM, dwh wrote:
> >
> > I believe as a side-effect of this, content scripts can no longer at
> > all access frames in p
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:12 AM, dwh wrote:
>
> I believe as a side-effect of this, content scripts can no longer at
> all access frames in pages (window.frames is a single frame, rather
> than a collection of them all)... I view this decidedly as a bug
> rather than feature, and cannot see a reaso
I believe as a side-effect of this, content scripts can no longer at
all access frames in pages (window.frames is a single frame, rather
than a collection of them all)... I view this decidedly as a bug
rather than feature, and cannot see a reason to intentionally do this
(if we can access the DOM
awesome work!
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> Today I landed a patch that enables a security feature for extensions.
> Now when an extension runs a content script, that script runs in a
> "parallel universe" with the page. In its isolated world, the content
> script can
+chromium-extensions
BTW, this will *not* be in 194.x, as it was checked in after the
branch was cut. It will be in the next dev channel release.
- a
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
> abarth++
>
> This is a super important change for the extension system and
> increases my
abarth++
This is a super important change for the extension system and
increases my confidence in the system significantly. If you didn't
understand Adam's summary and you want something with more pictures, I
have a (personal) blog post that covers some of the issues, here:
http://www.aaronboodm
