[chromium-dev] Re: Poting Chromium and security

2009-06-15 Thread Berend-Jan Wever
Thanks Adam! Before we start creating a list, we should think of a procedure that will make sure it is kept up-to-date. It makes no sense if we create the list now only to find that a year from now, when we need it, it's outdated. The two most important questions to me at this point are: - Were

[chromium-dev] Re: Poting Chromium and security

2009-06-15 Thread Adam Langley
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Berend-Jan Weverskyli...@chromium.org wrote: Before we start creating a list, we should think of a procedure that will make sure it is kept up-to-date. It makes no sense if we create the list now only to find that a year from now, when we need it, it's

[chromium-dev] Re: Poting Chromium and security

2009-06-15 Thread Berend-Jan Wever
I was afraid this would turn out to be difficult. Is there any way we might be able to diff what parts of the code get compiled in the different builds and auto generate a list? #defines might make this list rather long, but we may be able to go through the list once and identify known differences

[chromium-dev] Re: Poting Chromium and security

2009-06-14 Thread Adam Langley
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Berend-Jan Weverskyli...@chromium.org wrote: All in all this means that it would be very useful to maintain a list of implementation and design differences between the various ports. I am looking for practical and efficient ways to create and maintain such a