Wow - that might get messy.
I wonder if use of v8 hidden properties might be useful here. You could
potentially add a hidden object to the wrapper. But this may not work well.
Mike
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Adam Barth aba...@google.com wrote:
Thanks Mike.
As I mentioned to Dimitri,
You mean the idea in general won't work well, or this particular
approach? I talked it over with Feng awhile ago, and he seemed to
think the general idea was implementable. I think the code has changed
since then though, with workers.
- a
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Mike Belshe
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
You mean the idea in general won't work well, or this particular
approach? I talked it over with Feng awhile ago, and he seemed to
think the general idea was implementable. I think the code has changed
since then though,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
You mean the idea in general won't work well, or this particular
approach? I talked it over with Feng awhile ago, and he seemed to
think the general
/me raises hand sheepishly. Whatcha need? :)
:DG
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
Who's a good contact for V8DOMMap? It's probably going to need some
surgery to support isolated user scripts, and I want to make sure I'm
not screwing it up.
Thanks,
I may be able to help too.
I'm very worried about adding more dependencies on it.
void* casting is not good!
Mike
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
/me raises hand sheepishly. Whatcha need? :)
:DG
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Adam Barth
