On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com wrote:
Hello All,
Last week I re-landed a change to split off parts of chrome.gyp into .gypi's
in the same directory.
I had done something similar a couple weeks back, but took it out because
concern was raised about merge
I have similar concern about our build, in a way we handle different
configurations.
There are several ways to specify a set of files for different
configurations, such as suffic (_gtk/_mac),
source!, exclude/include, concat file lists, and I'm worrying that
it's getting out of control.
I'm
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM, oshima osh...@chromium.org wrote:
I have similar concern about our build, in a way we handle different
configurations.
There are several ways to specify a set of files for different
configurations, such as suffic (_gtk/_mac),
source!, exclude/include, concat
I had talked about this with mmentovai and some others. Concern was raised
about the complexity this would introduce into gyp. I do have a gut feeling
we'll eventually go there. What Greg is currently doing at least works with
gyp as it now stands, but it isn't pretty.
Mark, does what's happened
I think that the stripped-down NaCl-specific 64-bit targets are the
right thing to have happened to base, at least for now.
Mark
Brad Nelson wrote:
I had talked about this with mmentovai and some others. Concern was raised
about the complexity this would introduce into gyp. I do have a gut
You mean as 'base' currently is, or duplicating the file lists?
-BradN
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
I think that the stripped-down NaCl-specific 64-bit targets are the
right thing to have happened to base, at least for now.
Mark
Brad Nelson
Bradley Nelson wrote:
You mean as 'base' currently is, or duplicating the file lists?
I mean I have no problem with base_nacl_win64 existing as a target,
and with adding files that are needed in that target to that target.
Mark
--
Chromium Developers mailing list:
Even if those files are largely a duplicate of those in base?
-BradN
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Bradley Nelson wrote:
You mean as 'base' currently is, or duplicating the file lists?
I mean I have no problem with base_nacl_win64 existing as a
Bradley Nelson wrote:
Even if those files are largely a duplicate of those in base?
If it gets to that point, we can maintain the sources list, or the
shared sources list, in a variable. Then we could do explicit
additions to the targets that need it, or explicit excludes if that
winds up
Greg, will this work for you?
-BradN
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Bradley Nelson wrote:
Even if those files are largely a duplicate of those in base?
If it gets to that point, we can maintain the sources list, or the
shared sources list, in a
10 matches
Mail list logo
