Thread for :
SR 113100910848314:
[MS-SMB2] Q 1 of 3: Types of error a server can return in response to a session
logoff request from a client (section 2.2.8).
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2013 9:14 PM
To: 'Shirish Pargaonkar'
Cc: cifs-proto
[-dochelp; +casemail]
Hi Nadezhda,
Thank you for your question. We created SR 113100710843173 to track this
issue. An engineer from the Protocols will contact you soon.
Bryan
From: nivanova.sa...@gmail.com [mailto:nivanova.sa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Nadezhda Ivanova
Sent: Monday,
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding case number and casemail]
Hi David,
We created the support incident SR 112110862761681 to track this issue. An
engineer from the team will contact you soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: David Disseldorp [mailto:dd...@suse.de]
Sent: Thursday, November 08,
Metze,
Slight change in plan to load balance on this side: my colleague Edgar (copied)
will help you on this issue.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:17 PM
To: 'Stefan (metze) Metzmacher'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding case number and casemail]
Hi Metze,
We created the case 112080864018345 to track this issue, which I will help you
with.
Thanks.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 9:38 AM
To:
Thank you Jay for all the research on this.
Go ahead and close this out.
Andrew, please let us know if you need anything further.
If you do, we can re-open the issue.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Jay Simmons
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:12 PM
To: Andrew Bartlett; Bryan Burgin
Cc
[mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 10:36 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: 'cifs-protocol@cifs.org'; MSSolve Case Email; Tarun Chopra
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 06:21 +, Bryan Burgin wrote:
Andrew,
I'm touching base
is SMB or SMB2. Do you have any test results if the
client is something other than Windows 7 (i.e., XP, Windows Vista or the
Windows 8 Consumer Preview)?
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 10:03 PM
To: Gordon Ross
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding case mail and case number]
Hi Gordon,
I can help you with this. As you suggest, a TTT may be helpful of, perhaps,
the Explorer process, but that would be huge. First, I suggest ETW/ETL logs
from the file system to exclude it first. I attached it the tool (rename
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding casemail and case number]
Hi Chris.
We created SR 112030256125953 to track this. My intention is to file this as a
TDI and then close this issue, as you are providing feedback. Please let me
know if you concur.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Josh Curry
Hi, Jeff,
We created the case 112030174895568 to track this issue.
Chris, thank you for your reply.
We researched this issue a few months ago with Steve. The outcome of our
analysis can be found at
https://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/2011-October/002207.html.
Please let me know
Andrew,
I'm touching base to see if you can provide the exact smbtorture steps to
reproduce your issue.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:00 AM
To: Andrew Bartlett
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email; Tarun Chopra
Subject: RE
[mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:10 AM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 22:05 +, Bryan Burgin wrote:
Andrew,
I'm working with Neil and others
Andrew,
I'm working with Neil and others here. Can you tell us how to repro this issue
in-house?
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:45 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject
Session Key (see section 2.3.14 of [MS-DTYP]) to encrypt sensitive data since
this does not protect the data.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:38 PM
To: Andrew Bartlett (abart...@samba.org)
Cc: 'cifs-protocol@cifs.org'; MSSolve Case Email
know the outcome or ping you if we need any
further information.
Going forward, I'll be your primary contact for this issue.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:18 PM
To: Hongwei Sun hongw...@microsoft.com
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org cifs
[dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number and casemail]
Hi Chris,
I'll file a TDI on this. We created 22854095339 to track this issue. My
intention is to close it as soon as the TDI is filed, which will be later today.
Thank you for raising this issue with us.
Bryan
-Original
-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:08 AM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:22854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE
Thanks, Bryan.
As I said below, it's likely that I introduced
[Dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number to title casemail]
Hi Andrew,
We made case 21459051600 to track this issue. I did a quick review of
KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED (25).
I think the best way to dig into this issue is to capture a Time Travel Trace
of the process LSASS on the Windows 2008
Password:
CCHE2l7$t$bJ]T
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:08 PM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; 'Love Hörnquist Åstrand'; MSSolve Case Email;
Tarun Chopra
Subject: RE: [REG:21459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your question. Someone from the team will contact you soon.
Our call tacking system is experiencing problems right now; I'll have a case
number for tracking tomorrow.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.mn.org]
Sent:
[Dochelp to bcc]
Case 20724281237 was created to track this issue.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:53 PM
To: Christopher R. Hertel; Interoperability Documentation Help;
cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: SMB2 ProcessId header field
Negotiate) I should ignore MaxMpxCount, MS-CIFS is not clear on
which commands MaxMpxCount is enforced and other protocol-related MaxMpx
questions.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 2:19 PM
To: Steve French
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; p
Hi, Matthieu,
I created case 00558993529 to track this issue. A member of the team will
be in touch with you soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 7:54 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help;
Hi, Steve,
I'll look into this for you in the process of working the issue that is driving
this inquiry: the large file copy to Vista or Windows 7 clients resulting in
the DOS NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY error on subsequent SMB session setups (among other
commands, like Queries, which return
See attached.
B.
-Original Message-
From: Kai Blin [mailto:k...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:46 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email; Bill Wesse
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110081057234684] Requesting
[dochelp to bcc]
[Adding casemail and case info to title]
Hi Matthieu,
Thank you for your question. Hongwei (copied) will be working with you on
this. He will be contacting you soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09,
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding casemail and case number]
Hi, Metze,
Thank you for your question. An engineer from the protocols team will pick
this up soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 7:06 AM
To:
[dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number; adding casemail]
Hi Chris,
I created 111061070310825 to track this. One of the engineers from the
Protocols team will reply soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: ubiqx Consulting, Inc. [mailto:t...@ubiqx.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 11:28 AM
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding case number and case mail]
Hi, Matthieu,
Thank you for your question. I created case 111060858976134 to track this. An
engineer from the Protocol team will pick this up soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent:
[Dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number and casemail]
Hi Tridge,
Hongwei gave us a heads up that this would be coming in. I created case
111060784988397, which he will pick up.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:32
Hi, Matthieu,
Just a quick note. I believe we have an answer for you, but we are having the
protocol architect review our findings. I should have a final answer to you
soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:02 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'
Cc: p
and the maximum number of bytes in the reply
message is the size in bytes of a response with MaxPageSize objects.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:01 AM
To: 'm...@samba.org'
Cc: 'p...@tridgell.net'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
Subject
-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:40 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'; 'p...@tridgell.net'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'
Cc: MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:111020102754615] behavior of windows with/without the
DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set right
Sorry for the delay
[dochelp to bcc]
Hi, Matthieu,
I am working on three of your issues right now, including this one:
111020102754615: [MS-ADTS]: Behavior of windows with/without the
DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set right
111012761781621: [MS-DRSR] Dirsync control
111020105939834: [MS-ADTS]: Server
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding case info casemail]
Hi, Nadya,
Thank you for your questions. An engineer from the Protocols team will contact
you soon.
Bryan
From: didr...@gmail.com [mailto:didr...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Nadezhda Ivanova
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 6:04 AM
To:
that with the similar comments you made
on another thread and address those separately.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:00 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
Subject
a request/suggestion
for new document. I am discussing this with the Windows Interop team. I'll
follow-up in a new thread.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 3:50 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
?).
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 11:52 AM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc: 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110122270441425] MS-DNSP; RANK in 2.2.2.2.5 DNS_RPC_RECORD
dwFlags 2.3.1.2 dnsRecord; how the rank affects
Hi Tridge,
Happy new year. I'm checking to see if you had any additional feedback on this
or if you received the information you needed.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 3:12 PM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc: 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; 'abart
in the
example you provided. Is this possible?
B.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 2:15 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: 'tri...@samba.org'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110122106325012] [MS-DNSP
The feedback I'm getting from the PG is The ranks do affect processing of the
DNS protocol, but these effects are implementation specific. The MS-DNSP
protocol is not affected.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 11:39 AM
To: 'tri
[dochelp to bcc]
Hi, Tridge. I can help you with this. It's in the same area as the dwReserved
question you raised. I created SR 110122152819123 to track it.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 11:37 PM
To:
Tridge,
Just a bit of quick case housekeeping. I created cases for the various issues
you raised yesterday and dispersed them across the team. Three of your
questions I own and are distributed between two cases:
110122106325012: Documentation for DNS_TYPE_ZERO; use of
[dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case # to title; adding casemail]
Hi Tridge,
I created SR 110122105892239 to track this issue. An engineer from our team
will contact you soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 4:01 PM
[dochelp to bcc]
Tridge,
I created SR 110122106325012 to track this issue. An engineer from the
protocols team will contact you soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:23 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation
No prob, Tridge,
I'll cancel the case. Thanks for the quick note.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:58 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help; cifs-proto...@samba.org;
abart...@samba.org
Subject: Re:
5 File(s) 2,640,992 bytes
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:18 AM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: 'Jeremy Allison'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; 'p...@tridgell.net'; MSSolve
Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:110112076424325]Problem
on the same page re action
plan. In parallel, I'm going to set up an environment where a Windows 7 box
needs to add a new networked printer and download the appropriate driver to
test drive the instructions I sent you.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, November 24
Jeremy,
I'm researching this for you. I worked with Guenther on similar
[MS-RPRN]questions during the Samba IO Lab, along with Nick and Tarun from
Microsoft and the Product Group.
The two most detailed debugging techniques would be for me to collect ETW
traces from you or Time Travel Traces
request.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 3:04 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110110481276509] Please include bitfield names in MS-NRPC
LogonParameters
Hi Andrew.
I can help you with this.
My understanding that this is a continuation of the issue you discussed in the
past where we would add the hex value of each bit field to improve readability
and make searching easier. Is that correct? For example, the table entry for
2.2.1.4.15's
a reason that doing so
is required to implement the protocol.
As for adding the hex values, I'm prepared to make that request.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 1:57 PM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org
of the CountIncomingAuthInfos
field through the end of the of the PreviousIncomingAuthInfos field.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:50 PM
To: Guenther Deschner (g...@samba.org)
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; 'p...@tridgell.net'
Subject
11:22 PM
To: Bryan Burgin; Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:110101173790653] MS-SAMR 3.1.1.8.1 objectClass;
UF_PASSWD_NOT_REQD when objects using UF_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT are created
Hi Hongwei and Bryan,
I've discovered this by creating computer
[Dochelp to bcc]
Matthias,
Thank you for your question. I created case SR 110101258293492 to track this
issue. Someone from the Protocols team will pick this up and work with you on
this.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent:
receive that
information, someone from the team will follow-up with you.
Thanks.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; Bryan Burgin
Subject: RE: [REG:110091558099846] RE: Incompleteness
, Saved Games, and Searches. The Group Policy: Folder Redirection Protocol
Extension is not available on operating system versions earlier than Windows
2000 Server.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 11:38 PM
To: Guenther Deschner (g...@samba.org
Matthieu,
This regards the issue you raised at the IO Lab regarding what error code a
MS-BKRP server implementation should return if called on a RODC. You observed
that the Microsoft MS-BKRP implementation in this scenario returns
INVALID_PARAMETER.
I believe the documentation supports that
a solution for you I'll pass it on.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:19 AM
To: Guenther Deschner (g...@samba.org)
Cc: MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG:110092949275537] MS-LSAD 2.2.7.16 LSAPR_TRUSTED_DOMAIN_AUTH_BLOB
[Darryl Welch, Will Gregg
: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 6:06 PM
To: 'me...@samba.org'
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; 'p...@tridgell.net'
Subject: [REG:110100103381162] [MS-NRPC] 3.5.5.3.1 DsrGetDcNameEx2 (Opnum 34)
172 what does is set to the message field that is set. mean
Stefan
.
These changes will be reflected in a future release of the document.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:33 AM
To: Kai Blin
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110081057234684
Guenther,
I created case SR 110100183874086 to track your issue described below. I or
someone from my team will follow-up with you. As you are aware, we already
made contact with the product group and will be filing a TDI.
Bryan
MS-RPRN 2.2.4.14 Printer Names
Günther,
I created SR 110100185715287 to continue our research into this issue. I or
someone on my team will follow up with you.
Bryan
MS-RPRN Setting a driver for a printer
---
When we successfully upload a printer driver from a Win7
Günther,
I created SR 110100100943069 to track this issue (described below). I or
someone from my team will follow-up with you
Bryan
this is the crash info which I can reproduce at will:
* create a samba3 domain controller
* have this smb.conf setting: logon home = \\%N\%U (which will
Stefan,
The issue below was raised during the IO Lab. I created the case SR
110100103381162 to track it. The question that was raised was clarification on
what field is set to the message field that is set (from below) means.
Someone from my team will follow-up with you
Bryan
MS-NRPC]
MUST return an
appropriate nonzero error code. The error code returned SHOULD be equal to
ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND (0x2).
Bryan
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:36 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'; Hongwei Sun
Cc: MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG:110092975377470] Issue 2 (was Summary
I reviewed your Server 2003 trace and verified that it does return 0x03e5
(#define ERROR_IO_PENDING 997L). I will add this to the request for a behavior
note.
Bryan
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:55 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'; Hongwei Sun
Cc: MSSolve Case Email
record as described in MS-DNSP.
We will be making an update to MS-DNSP to describe how dnsRecords and Counted
names appear on-the-wire.
I'll keep you updated and I'll see you next week at SNIA.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:39 AM
I bundled up all my research (including identifying the source in DNS.EXE that
is producing this traffic) and filed an inquiry with the protocol architects.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Kai Blin [mailto:k...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:39 AM
To: Bryan Burgin
Cc
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:07 PM
To: 'Kai Blin'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110081057234684] Requesting clarification of MS-DNSP data
structure DNS_RPC_NAME
Quick update.
I reviewed
2.2.2.2.1 (with an emphasis on DNS_RPC_RECORD_SRV records). Or,
is this issue involving something other than MS-DNSP?
Bryan
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 4:04 PM
To: 'k...@samba.org'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG
Kai,
Just a quick note that I am researching this for you.
Bryan
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
Andrew,
I went ahead and closed this issue. If you have additional questions, please
let me know.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 12:04 PM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: 'p...@tridgell.net'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org';
'mat+informatique.sa
requests
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:29 AM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org;
mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110062157456375] -[MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.7.3
msDs
[Mark and dochelp to bcc]
[Adding case number CaseMail]
Hi Matthieu,
I began looking at this for you to identify the trailing bytes you specified
and to investigate tools to decode/parse the Backup Key request. I'll reply
with more information as soon as I have more information to share.
to 0x3
(Section 2.2.5).
§ FALSE: the KDC SHOULD, in the encrypted pre-auth data part
([Referrals-11], Appendix A) of the TGS-REP message, include PA-DATA with
padata-type set to PA-SUPPORTED-ENCTYPES (165), and the padata-value set to 0x7
(Section 2.2.5).
Bryan
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent
77 matches
Mail list logo
