yum has a package.
On 06/12/06, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I tried installing from the AMD64 packages linked to
from the "getting Cinelerra" page, I could not do so
automagically. The dependencies were wrong.
Now others are complaining about that, too.
--
Herman Robak
___
So, I can't imagine a schedule is reasonable given the development at
the moment. But I've been wrong before. What do you propose?
well, if we dont have a regular schedule (every month, for example),
developers could send a mail when svn is OK for a new tarball. maybe
someone else could che
On 2006-12-15 09:42, muzzol wrote:
> hi!
>
> how often is a tarball created?
>
> i've asked before for an automatic process but someone said that code
> doesn't change so often to need that, then when must i check to create
> a new package?
>
> it would be great to create a schedule involving co
On Friday 15 December 2006 4:44 am, Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
> Miha Kitič schreef:
> > I am not sure I understand the problem perfectly, but I am using Ubuntu
> > Edgy and as far as I remember, I could compile Cinelerra wihtout needing
> > to install anything else but Ubuntu official stuff.
hi!
how often is a tarball created?
i've asked before for an automatic process but someone said that code
doesn't change so often to need that, then when must i check to create
a new package?
it would be great to create a schedule involving coders and packagers
to be sure that users dont miss n
Muzzol, could you try packaging an Edgy repo for Cinelerra with only
Ubuntu repo's available?
yes, i'll try that asap.
regards,
--
^ ^
O O
(_ _)
muzzol(a)gmail.com
jabber id: muzzol(a)jabber.dk
No atribueix
Miha Kitič schreef:
I am not sure I understand the problem perfectly, but I am using Ubuntu
Edgy and as far as I remember, I could compile Cinelerra wihtout needing
to install anything else but Ubuntu official stuff.
As far as I remember it went the same for Dapper before. But I also
remember t
