Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

I also agree with this point of view. First technical issues then Look'n like. (According to people who wants to participate) First better ways then beautiful paths. Beautiful must be the result, may be also the way to get there. For exemple: the way to install cinelerra

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

I liked openshot, have to say, the best "performance" of mlt (dp the RIP jahshaka maybe) and almost agree with everything below... Cinelerra is a great software that permit to work as professional (i am since i pay the rent with that) but no way needs to be improved and the only way to do t

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

What is the progress of Lumiera? Isn't that intended to be the replacement for Cinelerra? If so, should energy be focused there? if not, where is Cinelerra headed? On 27/01/11 21:52, Valentina Messeri wrote: I liked openshot, have to say, the best "performance" of mlt (dp the RIP jahshaka mayb

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

Quoting "David Armstrong" : What is the progress of Lumiera? Isn't that intended to be the replacement for Cinelerra? If so, should energy be focused there? if not, where is Cinelerra headed? yes, yu're some-way right...i just tried to be simple and practice, since i use these tools (gnu mu

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

yosepkey schrieb: > My idea is to make cinelerra more pleasing to the eye and more functional. ... > I know that the graphical environment is internal cinelerra, but that creates > problems, I think it could use qt or gtk. > OpenShot, PiTiVi and Kdenlive are based on MLT, which is fine, but I thin

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

Douglas Pollard schrieb: > Here's what I wish, since we are talking about want's. I wish some really > smart programmer would write a program that could Analise a video file and > tell you exactly what is wrong with it. Every now and then I do a video and > there is an error in the file and I

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:35:16 +1100 David Armstrong wrote: > What is the progress of Lumiera? I'm not helping and therefore do not want to complain, but I've feeling it's a bit over ambitious project who won't be finished for a long time when it's the question how the video editing will look like

[CinCV] What needs doing, and how do we do it? (was: cinelerra fork)

Hi, everyone. I'm Herman Robak, the moderator of this mailing list. 8 years ago, I suggested forking Cinelerra in a post to the web forum on Cinelerra's Sourceforge site. The result was the "Community Version", a branch of Cinelerra hosted at the same server as skolelinux.no. To make a long st

Re: [CinCV] no sound - "Unknown PCM HDA Intel #0"?

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jan Luo wrote: > am running a freshly installed Cinelerra 2.1CV  Gentoo - 20101104 . > did the basic settings, but no sound: > > "Gentoo - 20101104 (C) 2006 Heroine Virtual Ltd. > External ffmpeg > Compiled on Thu Jan 27 13:40:08 CET 2011 > > Cinelerra is free soft

Re: [CinCV] What needs doing, and how do we do it? (was: cinelerra fork)

Hello. On 01/27/2011 02:48 PM, Herman Robak wrote: ** An agenda, some kind of schedule, and a place to maintain it. I suggest a corner of the Documentation Wiki at cinelerra.org (Maybe frequent IRC meetings, too) I would suggest Launchpad.net as well. I'm a developer for Mixxx and we use that

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

Hi. A few remarks On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Ichthyostega wrote: > yosepkey schrieb: >> My idea is to make cinelerra more pleasing to the eye and more functional. > ... >> I know that the graphical environment is internal cinelerra, but that creates >> problems, I think it could use qt or

Re: [CinCV] no sound - "Unknown PCM HDA Intel #0"?

On 01/27/2011 05:12 PM, Einar Rünkaru wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jan Luo wrote: >> am running a freshly installed Cinelerra 2.1CV Gentoo - 20101104 . >> did the basic settings, but no sound: >> >> "Gentoo - 20101104 (C) 2006 Heroine Virtual Ltd. >> External ffmpeg >> Compiled on Th

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

hi there, have you guys seen this: http://www.ramenfx.org/ it's (was?) the replacement for the old jahshaka. currently, the project is stopped, but it seems that some blender people took interest in it, so I believe it might "reopen" soon. i haven't had the time to test i

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

Hi, Time to voice my own opinion: I've been following Cinelerra for quite a few years now, and the truth is that I think it's done correctly and that it's heading in the right direction. That is to say, that it allows a professional attitude in editing (no bells and whistles, but gives the ne

Re: [CinCV] What needs doing, and how do we do it? (was: cinelerra fork)

On 01/27/2011 08:48 AM, Herman Robak wrote: Hi, everyone. I'm Herman Robak, the moderator of this mailing list. 8 years ago, I suggested forking Cinelerra in a post to the web forum on Cinelerra's Sourceforge site. The result was the "Community Version", a branch of Cinelerra hosted at the sam

Re: [CinCV] no sound - "Unknown PCM HDA Intel #0"?

On 01/28/2011 01:45 AM, Jan Luo wrote: > On 01/27/2011 05:12 PM, Einar Rünkaru wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jan Luo wrote: >>> am running a freshly installed Cinelerra 2.1CV Gentoo - 20101104 . >>> did the basic settings, but no sound: >>> >>> "Gentoo - 20101104 (C) 2006 Heroine Vir

Re: [CinCV] cinelerra fork.

2011/1/27 Eli Billauer > Hi, > > Time to voice my own opinion: I've been following Cinelerra for quite a few > years now, and the truth is that I think it's done correctly and that it's > heading in the right direction. That is to say, that it allows a > professional attitude in editing (no bells

Re: [CinCV] no sound - "Unknown PCM HDA Intel #0"?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Jan Luo wrote: > On 01/28/2011 01:45 AM, Jan Luo wrote: >> On 01/27/2011 05:12 PM, Einar Rünkaru wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jan Luo wrote: am running a freshly installed Cinelerra 2.1CV  Gentoo - 20101104 . did the basic settings, but no