Re: [CinCV] Open Source

2010-12-03 Thread Heikki Repo
The LW administrators have now started a new thread on this issue on their forums: Back in April 2010, we announced our plans to take Lightworks open source. We always said the first step would be to make the application freely available so that a large community of users could start becoming

Re: [CinCV] Open Source

2010-12-02 Thread Ichthyostega
IL'dar AKHmetgaleev schrieb: На Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:10:26 +0100 Valentina Messeri v...@poliforma.org записано: Lat's wait one more year. Perhaps EditShare just need more time to replace some proprietary code. Codec support for example. IMHO they win much more by GPLing this code then lose.

[CinCV] Open Source

2010-12-01 Thread Valentina Messeri
yes, it's probably (or absolutely) not correct to call Open Source the binary of a source (wich is not open at all and not to mention this binary is only for privative system) i agree that opensource, more than a brand is some kind of revolution. And we had to be carefull, when using this

Re: [CinCV] Open Source

2010-12-01 Thread IL'dar AKHmetgaleev
На Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:10:26 +0100 Valentina Messeri v...@poliforma.org записано: Lat's wait one more year. Perhaps EditShare just need more time to replace some proprietary code. Codec support for example. IMHO they win much more by GPLing this code then lose. yes, it's probably (or